477,20 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 477,19]
Adaptation: Mergell 1943 215 [477,19-477,25], 219-20 [477,19-477,30], 231 [477,19-479,2], Pastré 1979 377 [472,21-478,4] Charakterisierung: Johnson, L. 1969 78 Anm. 1 [477,13-477,21] Didaktik u. Lehrdichtung: Weichselbaumer 2003 197 [475,19-477,21] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Bertau 1972/73 781 [476,12-477,30], Bertau 1972 88 Anm. 61 [476,12-479,27], Bertau 1983c 40 Anm. 27 [476,12-479,27] Erzähltechnik: Harroff 1974 63 [476,1-478,30], 71 [477,19-477,21], Schirok 1976 65 [477,13-477,21], Schmid, E. 1976 97 Anm. 147 [476,12-477,25], Green 1982b 192 Anm. 58 [477,19-477,21], 203 [477,13-479,30], 217 Anm. 146 [477,13-477,21], Neuendorff 1987a 286 [477,19-477,30], Stein, A. 1993 120 Anm. 205 [477,1-477,30], Schu 2002 373 [477,19-479,12] Geschichte: Passage 1984 136 [476,1-477,30] Gottfried von Straßburg: Haruta 1978 303 [477,20-477,21] Gral: Burdach 1938 517 [477,1-478,6], 536 [477,1-478,6], Burdach 1974 517 [477,1-478,6], 536 [477,1-478,6], Frappier 1977b 28 Anm. 16 [476,12-478,7] Herzeloyde: Niermann 1998 15 [477,19-477,21] indoeur. Mythologie: Pastré 1993c 285 [477,19-477,21], Pastré 1994g 170 [477,19-477,21] Interpretation: Faust 1903/04 289 [473,5-477,30], 290 [477,19-477,21], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Roßkopf 1972 219 [477,19-479,12], Kratz, H. 1973a 298 [477,1-478,12], Dewald 1975 177 Anm. 32 [477,1-478,6], Marchand 1977a 255 [477,20-477,21], Pérennec 1984f 240 [477,19-479,2], Mertens, V. 1993b 201 [477,1-478,7], Nellmann 1994c 592 [476,12-477,30], Pratelidis 1994 48 [477,19-477,21], Johnson, L. 1999 334 [477,19-477,30] Jenseitsmotive: Braches 1961 199 Anm. 792 [476,13-478,7] Memoria: Remscheid 1999 176 [476,10-478,7] Namen: Müller, M. 2003 206 [477,1-477,21] Quellen - allgemein: Haferland 1994a 24 [476,12-477,21] Quellen - Chrétien: Rachbauer 1934 239 [477,19-480,2], Rachbauer 1970 239 [477,19-480,2], Rachbauer 1980 239 [477,19-480,2] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 344 [476,1-477,30], Schirok 1982 92 [477,1-477,25] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Wagemann 1998 32 [468,12-486,14], 160 [477,1-477,21] Ritterethik: Voß, R. 1998 34 [477,19-479,12] Sprache: Askedal 1974 32 [477,19-477,21], Tao 1997 118 [477,19-477,25] Stil: Weber, G. 1928 251 Anm. 386 [477,1-477,30], Heinzle 1972 150, Yeandle 1984 10 Titurel: Ehrismann, G. 1927 290 [476,12-478,6] Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 119 [476,3-478,10] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Sutter 2003 203 [475,19-478,7], 219-20 [474,7-478,6] Werkstruktur: Henzen 1951 194 [477,20-477,21], Henzen 1966 130 [477,20-477,21], Sauer, M. 1981 265 Anm. 2 [476,24-478,7] Wirtschaft u. Handel: Otto 1993 157 [477,19-477,25], 180 Anm. 401 [477,19-477,25] Wortschatz: Schultheiß 1937 12 [477,19-477,21]
	[Zu 477,21]