477,29 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 477,28]
Adaptation: Mergell 1943 219-20 [477,19-477,30], 231 [477,19-479,2], Pastré 1979 377 [472,21-478,4] Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 348 [477,29-477,30], 352 [477,29-477,30] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Bertau 1972/73 781 [476,12-477,30], Bertau 1972 88 Anm. 61 [476,12-479,27], Bertau 1983c 40 Anm. 27 [476,12-479,27] erbarme: Heckel, H. 1939 81 [477,29-477,30], Wapnewski 1955 70 [477,29-477,30], Müller, M. 2003 152 [477,29-477,30] Erzähltechnik: Harroff 1974 63 [476,1-478,30], Schirok 1976 60 [477,29-477,30], Green 1982b 201 [477,29-477,30], 203 [477,13-479,30], Neuendorff 1987a 286 [477,19-477,30], Stein, A. 1993 120 Anm. 205 [477,1-477,30], Schu 2002 373 [477,19-479,12] ethischer Wortschatz: Heckel, H. 1939 27 Anm. 40, Martin, A. 1984 78 [477,29-477,30] Geschichte: Passage 1984 136 [476,1-477,30] Gral: Burdach 1938 517 [477,1-478,6], 536 [477,1-478,6], Burdach 1974 517 [477,1-478,6], 536 [477,1-478,6], Frappier 1977b 28 Anm. 16 [476,12-478,7] Grammatik: Ehrismann, G. 1903/04 147 [477,28-477,30], Boysen 1910 120 Hilfe u. Rat: Mohr 1954a 191 [477,29-477,30], Mohr 1979d 55 [477,29-477,30] Interpretation: Faust 1903/04 289 [473,5-477,30], Weber, G. 1948 41 Anm. 1 [477,29-477,30], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Roßkopf 1972 219 [477,19-479,12], Kratz, H. 1973a 298 [477,1-478,12], Dewald 1975 177 Anm. 32 [477,1-478,6], Pérennec 1984f 240 [477,19-479,2], Hauer 1992 67 [477,29-477,30], Mertens, V. 1993b 201 [477,1-478,7], Nellmann 1994c 592 [476,12-477,30], Blank 1999 228 [477,29-477,30], Johnson, L. 1999 334 [477,19-477,30] Jenseitsmotive: Braches 1961 199 Anm. 792 [476,13-478,7] Memoria: Remscheid 1999 176 [476,10-478,7] Minne u. Ehe: Poag 1965a 76 Anm. 9 Quellen - Chrétien: Rachbauer 1934 239 [477,19-480,2], Rachbauer 1970 239 [477,19-480,2], Rachbauer 1980 239 [477,19-480,2] Reim: Bock, L. 1879 53 [477,29-477,30] Religion: Wapnewski 1955 70 [477,29-477,30], 160 [477,29-477,30], Duckworth 1980 233 [477,29-477,30], Wapnewski 1982 70 [477,29-477,30], 160 [477,29-477,30] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 344 [476,1-477,30] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Wagemann 1998 32 [468,12-486,14] Ritterethik: Keferstein 1937a 81 Anm. 1 [477,29-477,30], Voß, R. 1998 34 [477,19-479,12] Stil: Weber, G. 1928 251 Anm. 386 [477,1-477,30] Titurel: Ehrismann, G. 1927 290 [476,12-478,6] triuwe: San-Marte 1861 162 [477,29-477,30], Bock, L. 1879 53 [477,29-477,30], Heckel, H. 1939 51, 52 [477,29-477,30], Koppitz 1959 380 Anm. 119, Pretzel 1982 42 [477,29-477,30], Kruse, A. und Rössler, G. 1991 141 [477,29-477,30] Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 119 [476,3-478,10], 135 [477,22-478,24] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Sutter 2003 203 [475,19-478,7], 219-20 [474,7-478,6], 220 [477,29-477,30] Werkstruktur: Henzen 1951 197 [477,29-477,30], Henzen 1966 134 [477,29-477,30], Schirok 1976 68 [477,29-477,30], Sauer, M. 1981 265 Anm. 2 [476,24-478,7]
	[Zu 477,30]