483,27 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 483,26]
Adaptation: Stockum 1941 17 [483,24-483,28], 18 [483,19-484,8], Mergell 1943 222 [483,19-484,12], Weigand, H. 1952 501 [483,20-484,9], 507 Anm. 34 [481,18-483,28], Weigand, H. 1969c 103 [483,20-484,9], 113 Anm. 42 [481,18-483,28], Wolf, A. 1972 75 [483,22-483,28], Wolf, A. 1999g 252 [483,22-483,28] Anfortas: Essen 1967 92 [483,21-484,8] Chaostheorie: Grein Gamra 1999 99 [483,20-484,4] Charakterisierung: Ringeler 2000 144 Anm. 107 [483,19-484,30], 147 [483,19-484,8] Datierung: Schröder, Werner 1957 293 [481,6-483,28], 294 [481,6-483,28], Schröder, Werner 1989e 31 [481,6-483,28], 32 [481,6-483,28] Erzähltechnik: Lichtenstein 1897 81 [483,20-484,8], Harroff 1974 73 [483,24-483,30], 77 [483,19-484,8], Hirschberg 1976 93 Anm. 21 [483,19-484,8], 337 [483,19-484,8], Schirok 1976 61 [483,20-483,28], Green 1982b 194 [483,20-484,8], 204 [480,25-484,30], 213 [483,20-484,8], 316 Anm. 262 [483,19-484,8], 333 [483,24-484,8], Maczewski 1984 19 Anm. 24 [483,20-484,9], Schu 2002 272 [483,24-484,2], 289 [483,20-484,8], Urscheler 2002 151 zitiert als 383,22ff. [483,22-484,8] ethischer Wortschatz: San-Marte 1861 143 [483,27-483,28] Fragen: Helm 1953 102 [483,22-483,28], [483,24-483,30], Kordt 1997 227 [483,24-484,12] Frauenfiguren: Breyer 1996 69 [483,19-484,11] Gebärde u. Geste: Peil 1975 192 [483,20-484,8] Gottfried von Straßburg: Ehrismann, G. 1927 221 [481,6-484,17], Haruta 1978 240 [483,20-484,12] Gral: Birch-Hirschfeld 1877 246 [483,19-484,6], 256 [483,19-484,8], Weber, G. 1928 55 Anm. 68 [483,20-483,28], Burdach 1938 536 [483,19-484,8], Kiene 1944 10 [483,20-484,12], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952b 48 [483,22-483,28], Burdach 1974 536 [483,19-484,8], Horgan 1974 355 [483,20-484,8], Delcourt-Angélique 1977 101 [483,19-483,28], 111 [483,20-483,28], Delcourt-Angélique 1984 95 [483,19-483,28], 98 [483,20-484,8], Nellmann 1994c 682 [483,20-484,8], 691 [483,20-484,8], Kordt 1997 113 Anm. 75 [483,20-484,8], Johnson, S. 1999 79 [483,19-484,30], Barber, R. 2004 417 Anm. 17 [483,19-484,13] heterodoxe Einflüsse: Katann 1957/58 322 [483,1-483,30], Kahane, H. und Kahane, R. 1965 43 [483,19-484,5] indoeur. Mythologie: Pastré 1993c 287 [483,19-484,6], Pastré 1999b 21 [483,20-483,30] Interpretation: Bertau 1972/73 994 [483,24-484,5], San-Marte 1858a 509 [483,20-484,10], Misch 1927 295 Anm. 1 [483,1-483,30], Weber, G. 1948 40 [483,19-484,8], Wesle, C. 1950 35 [483,20-484,12], Joos und Whitesell 1951 105 [483,24-483,28], 162 [483,19-484,8], Kuhn, H. 1956 170 [483,20-483,28], Kuhn, H. 1959c 156 [483,20-483,28], Kuhn, H. 1969c 156 [483,20-483,28], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Roßkopf 1972 220 [483,22-484,30], 222 [483,20-484,30], Kratz, H. 1973a 299-300 [483,19-484,8], 310 [483,19-484,30], Wieners 1973 124 [483,24-483,30], 125 [483,20-484,9], Dewald 1975 230 Anm. 8 [483,25-483,30], 251 [483,24-484,7], 254 [483,24-483,30], 292 [483,25-483,30], Jones, M. 1975 68 [483,19-484,8], Gellinek 1976 159 [483,24-483,28], 160 [483,20-483,28], Blumstein 1977 101 [483,1-483,30], Tax 1978a 23 [483,19-484,8], Gellinek 1980b 104 [483,24-483,28], 105 [483,20-483,28], Green 1980a 392 [483,24-483,28], Ruh 1980 73 [483,21-483,28], 102 [483,20-484,8], Brogsitter 1984 79 Anm. 7 [483,24-484,2], Wynn 1984 291 [483,19-484,8], Czerwinski 1989 126 [483,20-484,12], Steppich 1990 263 [483,24-483,30], 271 [483,20-484,8], 272, 274 [483,24-483,30], Schmid, E. 1993b 192 [483,20-484,8], Steppich 1993 391 [483,20-484,8], 396 [483,24-483,30], 404 [483,24-483,30], 414 [483,24-483,30], 416 [483,24-483,30], Nellmann 1994c 585 [483,24-483,28], 772 [483,20-483,28], 774 [483,24-483,30], Pratelidis 1994 101 [483,20-484,8], 194 [483,20-484,8], Kordt 1997 29 [483,20-484,12], 51 [483,25-483,28], 144 [483,19-483,28], Bumke 2001a 70 [483,20-483,28], Shockey 2002 162 [483,21-483,28] Ironie: Green 1979a 165 Anm. 2 [483,19-483,28] Jenseitsmotive: Braches 1961 216 Anm. 882 [483,20-484,8] Kommunikation: Schnyder, M. 2003 375 [483,19-483,30] Kyot: Schröder, Walter Johannes 1959b 342 [483,19-483,28], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1978h 302 [483,19-483,28] Medizin: Haage 1984a 204 Anm. 26 [481,1-484,30], Haage 1985a 361 Anm. 21 [483,1-483,30], [481,1-484,30], Haage 1985b 104 Anm. 14 [483,19-484,12], 120 [483,19-484,8], Groos 1992 81 [483,20-484,12], Haage 1992d 89 [483,19-484,12], 148 Anm. 665 [483,19-484,12], 246 Anm. 227 [483,19-484,12], Groos 1994b 293 [483,20-484,8], Groos 1995 164 [483,20-484,8], 212-213 [483,19-484,6], Wegner 1998a 125 [483,20-483,29], Reichert, J. 2001 163 [483,19-484,12], 169 [483,24-483,30] Memoria: Remscheid 1999 170 [483,20-484,12] Metrik: Kraus, C. 1902 192 Minne u. Ehe: Greenfield 1984b 200 [481,5-484,18], Kleber, J. 1992b 224 [483,19-483,28], 309, [483,20-484,6] Möbel u. Haushaltsgegenstände: Lerchner, K. 1993 456 [483,20-484,8] Namen: Passage 1984 160 [480,1-483,30], Bertheau 2004 136 [481,1-483,30] Naturwissenschaft: Haage 1984a 204 Anm. 26 [483,1-483,30], Haage 1986e 212 [483,19-484,8], Harms 1986a 15 [483,20-484,8] Orient: Faugère 1979 32 [481,1-484,30] Quellen - allgemein: Heinzel 1893 44 [483,20-483,28], 92 [483,20-484,12], Golther 1925a 180 [483,19-484,12], Weber, G. 1928 144 Anm. 357 [483,24-483,28] Quellen - Chrétien: Rachbauer 1934 239 [483,19-484,2], Rachbauer 1970 239 [483,19-484,2], Rachbauer 1980 239 [483,19-484,2] Religion: San-Marte 1861 253 [483,21-484,8], Wapnewski 1955 102 [483,22-484,12], 173 Anm. 57 [483,20-483,28], Wapnewski 1982 102 [483,22-484,12], 173 Anm. 57 [483,20-483,28], Haferland 1994b 297 Anm. 109 [483,20-484,30] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 17 [483,19-484,12], 193 [483,19-484,30], Unger, R. 1990 80 [483,20-484,8] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Skrotzki 1998 25 [483,19-484,8], Wagemann 1998 32 [468,12-486,14], 207 [483,19-484,30] Ritterethik: Voß, R. 1998 33 [483,19-484,12] Schicksal u. Fortuna: Scharmann 1935b 70 [483,20-483,28] Schriftlichkeit: Ernst 1997b 346 Anm. 470 [483,19-484,12] Schuld: Kordt 1997 234 [483,24-483,30] Sprache: Kraus, C. 1898a 131 Anm. 1 [483,27-483,28], Kraus, C. 1985 131 Anm. 1 [483,27-483,28], Tao 1997 156 [483,20-483,30] Stil: Weber, G. 1928 266 [483,10-484,30] Suche: Wilson 1988 169 [483,19-483,30], 173 [483,19-484,30] Sünde: Sacker 1963 53 [483,19-484,8] Trevrizent: Weigand, H. 1954b 352 [481,5-483,28], Weigand, H. 1969e 147 [481,5-483,28] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Schultheiß 1937 43 [483,19-484,8], Allard 1990 213 [483,19-484,8], Delabar 1990 204 [483,19-484,12] Vorgeschichte (Gahmuret/Elterngeschichte): Peschel-Rentsch 1998c 112 [483,20-484,8] Wahrnehmung, Blick usw: Schirok 2002b 102 [483,24-483,30], Bleumer 2003 154 [483,24-483,28] Werkstruktur: Henzen 1951 197 [483,19-484,12], 217 [483,19-484,12], Wapnewski 1955 130 [483,19-484,12], Henzen 1966 134 [483,19-484,12], 156 [483,19-484,12], Schirok 1976 68 [483,20-484,12], Wapnewski 1982 130 [483,19-484,12] Zauberei: Haage 1986c 71 Anm. 127 [483,19-484,8], 71 Anm. 119 [481,1-484,30] Zeitverhältnisse: Groos 1995 123 [483,24-483,30]
	[Zu 483,28]