484, 9 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 484, 8]
Adaptation: Mergell 1943 222 [483,19-484,12], Weigand, H. 1952 501 [483,20-484,9], Weigand, H. 1969c 103 [483,20-484,9] Charakterisierung: Ringeler 2000 144 Anm. 107 [483,19-484,30] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Grimm, Walther Ludwig 1897 14 Erzähltechnik: Schirok 1976 61 [484,9-484,12], Green 1982b 194 Anm. 67 [484,9-484,12], 204 [480,25-484,30], 331 Anm. 38 [484,9-484,12], 333 [484,9-484,12], Maczewski 1984 19 Anm. 24 [483,20-484,9], Groos 1995 36 Fragen: Kordt 1997 227 [483,24-484,12] französischer Wortschatz: Suolahti 1933 300 Frauenfiguren: Breyer 1996 69 [483,19-484,11] Gottfried von Straßburg: Ehrismann, G. 1927 221 [481,6-484,17], Haruta 1978 240 [483,20-484,12] Gral: Kiene 1944 10 [483,20-484,12], Johnson, S. 1999 79 [483,19-484,30], Barber, R. 2004 417 Anm. 17 [483,19-484,13] heterodoxe Einflüsse: Katann 1957/58 329 [484,1-484,30] Interpretation: San-Marte 1858a 509 [483,20-484,10], Wesle, C. 1950 35 [483,20-484,12], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Roßkopf 1972 220 [483,22-484,30], 222 [483,20-484,30], Kratz, H. 1973a 310 [483,19-484,30], Wieners 1973 125 [483,20-484,9], Czerwinski 1989 126 [483,20-484,12], Steppich 1990 278 [484,9-484,12], Pratelidis 1994 48 [484,7-484,12], Kordt 1997 29 [483,20-484,12] Medizin: Haage 1984a 204 Anm. 26 [481,1-484,30], Haage 1985a 361 Anm. 21 [481,1-484,30], Haage 1985b 104 Anm. 14 [483,19-484,12], Groos 1992 81 [483,20-484,12], Haage 1992d 89 [483,19-484,12], 148 Anm. 665 [483,19-484,12], 246 Anm. 227 [483,19-484,12], Wegner 1998a 125 [484,9-484,12], Reichert, J. 2001 163 [483,19-484,12] Memoria: Remscheid 1999 170 [483,20-484,12] Minne u. Ehe: Greenfield 1984b 200 [481,5-484,18] Orient: Faugère 1979 32 [481,1-484,30] Quellen - allgemein: Heinzel 1893 92 [483,20-484,12], Golther 1925a 180 [483,19-484,12] Religion: Wapnewski 1955 102 [483,22-484,12], Wapnewski 1982 102 [483,22-484,12], Haferland 1994b 297 Anm. 109 [483,20-484,30] Rezeption (primär): Green 1994a 368 Anm. 188 Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 17 [483,19-484,12], 193 [483,19-484,30], Keller, J. 1997 116 Anm. 188 [484,9-484,12], Shockey 2002 320 [484,1-484,30] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Wagemann 1998 32 [468,12-486,14], 207 [483,19-484,30] Ritterethik: Voß, R. 1998 33 [483,19-484,12] Schriftlichkeit: Groos 1995 36, Ernst 1997b 346 Anm. 470 [483,19-484,12] Schuld: Hasty 1988 364 [484,1-484,20] Stil: Weber, G. 1928 266 [483,10-484,30] Suche: Wilson 1988 173 [483,19-484,30] Überlieferung: Hartl 1928 4 Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Schultheiß 1937 43 [484,3-484,12], Delabar 1990 204 [483,19-484,12] Werkstruktur: Henzen 1951 197 [483,19-484,12], 217 [483,19-484,12], Wapnewski 1955 130 [483,19-484,12], Henzen 1966 134 [483,19-484,12], 156 [483,19-484,12], Schirok 1976 68 [483,20-484,12], Acker 1979 51 Anm. 11 [484,1-484,30], Wapnewski 1982 130 [483,19-484,12] Zauberei: Haage 1986c 71 Anm. 119 [481,1-484,30], Ernst 1995 123 [484,9-484,12]
	[Zu 484,10]