488,24 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben)
Adaptation: Weber, G. 1928 266 > [488,1-490,2], Rachbauer 1934 240 [488,21-488,30], Mergell 1943 214 [488,21-491,18], 227 [488,21-488,30], 241 [488,21-489,20], Rachbauer 1970 240 [488,21-488,30], Rachbauer 1980 240 [488,21-488,30] Anfortas: Blamires 1966 339 [488,21-488,25] Ausgabe: Nellmann 1994c 702 [488,21-488,30] Buch IX: Schirok 1976 62 [488,21-489,21], Acker 1979 51 Anm. 11 [488,1-488,30], Neuendorff 1987a 280 [488,21-488,30], 287 [488,21-488,30] Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 339 [488,21-488,25] Condwiramurs: Blamires 1966 339 [488,21-488,25] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Lampe 1990 168-70 [487,23-489,21] Erzähler: Green 1979a 205 Anm. 2 [488,22-488,25] Erzähltechnik: Mergell 1943 214 [488,21-491,18], 227 [488,21-488,30], 241 [488,21-489,20], Schirok 1976 62 [488,21-489,21], Green 1979a 205 Anm. 2 [488,22-488,25], Green 1982b 196 [488,21-488,30], Northcott 1983 428 Anm. 8 [488,21-488,30], Neuendorff 1987a 280 [488,21-488,30], 287 [488,21-488,30] ethischer Wortschatz: San-Marte 1861 254 [488,21-488,25], 266 [488,1-488,30], Wapnewski 1955 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30], Wapnewski 1982 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30] Feirefiz: Blamires 1966 339 [488,21-488,25] Fiktionalität: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Forschungsbericht: Lowet 1955 162 [488,20-488,30], 197 [488,21-488,25] Fragen: Helm 1953 101 Anm. 10 [488,21-488,25], 101 [488,21-489,21] Fuetrer, Ulrich: Nyholm 1964 194 [488,14-489,21] Gahmuret: Blamires 1966 339 [488,21-488,25] Gawan: Blamires 1966 339 [488,21-488,25] Gesamtwürdigung: Sacker 1963 52 [488,21-488,30], Kratz, H. 1973a 301 [488,21-488,30] Gral: San-Marte 1861 254 [488,21-488,25], 266 [488,1-488,30], Birch-Hirschfeld 1877 269 [488,18-489,4], Weber, G. 1948 81 [488,1-489,21], 130 [488,21-488,30], 206 [488,21-489,21], Mockenhaupt 1968 74 [488,21-488,30] Handschriftliches: Lampe 1990 168-70 [487,23-489,21] Hartmann von Aue: Wapnewski 1955 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30], Wapnewski 1982 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30] Herzeloyde: Blamires 1966 339 [488,21-488,25] höfischer Roman: Green 1979a 205 Anm. 2 [488,22-488,25] höfisches Leben: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Individualität: Blamires 1966 339 [488,21-488,25] Interpretation: Weber, G. 1948 81 [488,1-489,21], 130 [488,21-488,30], 206 [488,21-489,21], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Nagel, B. 1978 93-94 Anm. 105 [488,22-488,25], Nagel, B. 1981b 126 Anm. 105 [488,22-488,25], Green 1982b 196 [488,21-488,30], Wynn 1984 293 [488,22-488,25], Lampe 1990 168-70 [487,23-489,21] Ironie: Green 1979a 205 Anm. 2 [488,22-488,25] Kommentar: Joos und Whitesell 1951 140, Nellmann 1994c 702 [488,21-488,30] Kyot: Weber, G. 1928 266 > [488,1-490,2], Lowet 1955 162 [488,20-488,30], 197 [488,21-488,25] Lichtmetaphorik: Cessari 2000 123 [488,21-489,4] Literaturgeschichte: Bertau 1972/73 975 [488,1-489,21], Nagel, B. 1977 600 [488,22-488,25], Bertau 1972/73 975 [488,1-489,21] Männerfiguren: Meister 1990a 262 [488,21-488,24] Minne u. Ehe: Wapnewski 1955 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Green 1979a 205 Anm. 2 [488,22-488,25], Wapnewski 1982 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30] Parzival: Blamires 1966 339 [488,21-488,25], Meister 1990a 262 [488,21-488,24] Prolog: Wapnewski 1955 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30], Wapnewski 1982 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30] Quellen - allgemein: Weber, G. 1928 266 > [488,1-490,2] Quellen - Chrétien: Birch-Hirschfeld 1877 269 [488,18-489,4], Weber, G. 1928 266 > [488,1-490,2], Rachbauer 1934 240 [488,21-488,30], Rachbauer 1970 240 [488,21-488,30], Rachbauer 1980 240 [488,21-488,30] Realismus: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Religion: San-Marte 1861 254 [488,21-488,25], 266 [488,1-488,30], Ehrismann, G. 1908 441 [488,21-489,21], Weber, G. 1935 23 [488,1-489,30], 25 [488,22-488,25], Mockenhaupt 1942 74 [488,21-488,30], Weber, G. 1948 81 [488,1-489,21], 130 [488,21-488,30], 206 [488,21-489,21], Lowet 1955 162 [488,20-488,30], 197 [488,21-488,25], Wapnewski 1955 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30], Mockenhaupt 1968 74 [488,21-488,30], Wapnewski 1982 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30], Lampe 1990 168-70 [487,23-489,21], Cessari 2000 123 [488,21-489,4] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 194 [488,14-489,21] Ritterethik: Ehrismann, G. 1908 441 [488,21-489,21], Lowet 1955 162 [488,20-488,30], 197 [488,21-488,25], Mockenhaupt 1968 74 [488,21-488,30] Rittertum: Green 1979a 205 Anm. 2 [488,22-488,25] Schicksal u. Fortuna: Scharmann 1935b 72 [488,22-488,25] Schuld: Mockenhaupt 1968 74 [488,21-488,30] fünf Sinne: Northcott 1983 428 Anm. 8 [488,21-488,30] Sprache: Tao 1997 129 [488,21-488,27] Steiner, Rudolf (Anthroposophie): Lampe 1990 168-70 [487,23-489,21] Stil: Weber, G. 1928 266 > [488,1-490,2], Mergell 1943 214 [488,21-491,18], 227 [488,21-488,30], 241 [488,21-489,20], Kutzner 1975 207 [488,21-489,21] Sünde: Helm 1953 101 Anm. 10 [488,21-488,25], 101 [488,21-489,21], Wapnewski 1955 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30], Mockenhaupt 1968 74 [488,21-488,30], Wapnewski 1982 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30] Teilausgabe: Joos und Whitesell 1951 140 Trevrizent: Blamires 1966 339 [488,21-488,25] tumpheit: Haas, A. 1964 155-56 [488,22-489,12] Übersetzung: Nellmann 1994c 702 [488,21-488,30] Übersetzungsproblematik: Schröder, Werner 1979e 158-62 [488,1-489,2], Schröder, Werner 1995c 29-33 [488,1-489,2] elterngeschichte)/Vorgeschichte (Gahmuret/Elterngeschichte): Lowet 1955 162 [488,20-488,30], 197 [488,21-488,25] Werkstruktur: Wapnewski 1955 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30], Schirok 1976 62 [488,21-489,21], Acker 1979 51 Anm. 11 [488,1-488,30], Green 1979a 205 Anm. 2 [488,22-488,25], Wapnewski 1982 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30] Wissenschaftsgeschichte: Joos und Whitesell 1951 140, Schröder, Werner 1979e 158-62 [488,1-489,2], Schröder, Werner 1995c 29-33 [488,1-489,2] Wortschatz: Scharmann 1935b 72 [488,22-488,25] Zahlenkomposition: Wapnewski 1955 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30], Schirok 1976 62 [488,21-489,21], Acker 1979 51 Anm. 11 [488,1-488,30], Wapnewski 1982 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30], Lampe 1990 168-70 [487,23-489,21] zwîvel: Helm 1953 101 Anm. 10 [488,21-488,25], 101 [488,21-489,21], Wapnewski 1955 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30], Wapnewski 1982 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30]
	(zu den versspezifischen Angaben)