499,16 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben)
Adaptation: Wilmotte 1932b 452 Anm. 2 [496,16-499,30], Rachbauer 1934 251-52 [499,11-499,30], Mergell 1943 235 [499,13-499,30], 241 [499,11-499,30], Rachbauer 1970 251-52 [499,11-499,30], Rachbauer 1980 251-52 [499,11-499,30], Haug 1991 245 Anm. 16 [499,1-499,25], Buschinger 2001a 322 [499,13-499,22], Buschinger 2001e 44 [499,13-499,22] Anfortas: Blamires 1966 331 [499,11-499,22] Buch IX: Tax 1974a 120 [498,1-499,30], Acker 1979 51 Anm. 11 [499,1-499,30], Neuendorff 1987a 280 [499,11-499,30], 288 [499,11-499,30], 289 [499,13-499,16] Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 331 [499,11-499,22], Ortmann 1972 127 Anm. 58 [499,14-499,16] Condwiramurs: Blamires 1966 331 [499,11-499,22] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Boigs 1992 13 Anm. 59 [499,11-499,25] Erzähltechnik: Mergell 1943 235 [499,13-499,30], 241 [499,11-499,30], Ortmann 1972 127 Anm. 58 [499,14-499,16], Tax 1974a 120 [498,1-499,30], Neuendorff 1987a 280 [499,11-499,30], 288 [499,11-499,30], 289 [499,13-499,16] ethischer Wortschatz: Wapnewski 1955 164 [498,1-499,30], Wapnewski 1982 164 [498,1-499,30] Feirefiz: Blamires 1966 331 [499,11-499,22] Fiktionalität: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Flegetanis: Hagen, P. 1900 103 [499,13-499,16] Forschungsbericht: Mergell 1953a 448 Anm. 31 [498,19-499,30] französischer Wortschatz: Suolahti 1933 299 Gahmuret: Blamires 1966 331 [499,11-499,22] Gattung: Haferland 1988 335 Anm. 86 [499,13-499,16] Gawan: Blamires 1966 331 [499,11-499,22] Gesamtwürdigung: Sacker 1963 105 [499,13-499,16], Kratz, H. 1973a 304 [496,22-499,18] Geschichte: Passage 1984 132 [496,1-499,30], 148 [496,1-499,30], Poag 1987b 231 [496,1-499,30] Gral: Hagen, P. 1900 103 [499,13-499,16], Burdach 1938 520 [499,11-499,25], Weber, G. 1948 66 Anm. 3, 207 [499,1-499,30], Kahane, H. und Kahane, R. 1965 57 [495,7-499,30], Mockenhaupt 1968 227 [499,16-499,17], Burdach 1974 520 [499,11-499,25] Hartmann von Aue: Wapnewski 1955 164 [498,1-499,30], Ito 1972 67 [499,16-499,22], Wapnewski 1982 164 [498,1-499,30] Heinrich von dem Türlin: Keller, J. 1997 402 Anm. 293 [499,13-499,22] Herzeloyde: Blamires 1966 331 [499,11-499,22] heterodoxe Einflüsse: Kahane, H. und Kahane, R. 1965 57 [495,7-499,30] höfischer Roman: Haferland 1988 335 Anm. 86 [499,13-499,16] höfisches Leben: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Individualität: Blamires 1966 331 [499,11-499,22] Interpretation: Weber, G. 1948 66 Anm. 3, 207 [499,1-499,30], Schröder, Werner 1971a 116 [499,13-499,16], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Wieners 1973 96, Hunter 1982 97 [499,13-499,25], Bertau 1983a 53, Brall 1983b 281-82 [499,13-499,30], Passage 1984 132 [496,1-499,30], 148 [496,1-499,30], Poag 1987b 231 [496,1-499,30], Haferland 1988 335 Anm. 86 [499,13-499,16], Czerwinski 1989 98 [499,15-499,18], Schröder, Werner 1989q 225 [499,13-499,16], Pratelidis 1994 139 [499,13-499,22], Storp 1994 68 [499,14-499,16] Interpretation - Strukturalismus: Simon, R. 1990 81 [499,11-499,18] Ither: Hunter 1982 97 [499,13-499,25] Jüngerer Titurel: Passage 1984 132 [496,1-499,30], 148 [496,1-499,30], Poag 1987b 231 [496,1-499,30] Kyot: Hagen, P. 1900 103 [499,13-499,16], Kahane, H. und Kahane, R. 1965 57 [495,7-499,30], Buschinger 2001a 322 [499,13-499,22], Buschinger 2001e 44 [499,13-499,22] Literaturgeschichte: Birkhan, H. 2003b 135 [499,13-499,25] Longinuslegende: Burdach 1938 520 [499,11-499,25], Burdach 1974 520 [499,11-499,25] Männer (allgemein): Storp 1994 68 [499,14-499,16] Minne u. Ehe: Wapnewski 1955 164 [498,1-499,30], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Wapnewski 1982 164 [498,1-499,30], Kleber, J. 1992b 315 [499,15-499,16], Riemer, W. und Egert 1992 80 [498,13-499,22] Namen: Passage 1984 132 [496,1-499,30], 148 [496,1-499,30], Poag 1987b 231 [496,1-499,30] Parzival: Blamires 1966 331 [499,11-499,22] Philologie: Fisher, R. 1982 230 Priester Johannes: Hagen, P. 1900 103 [499,13-499,16] Prolog: Wapnewski 1955 164 [498,1-499,30], Wapnewski 1982 164 [498,1-499,30] Quellen - allgemein: Hagen, P. 1900 103 [499,13-499,16], Burdach 1938 520 [499,11-499,25], Kahane, H. und Kahane, R. 1965 57 [495,7-499,30], Burdach 1974 520 [499,11-499,25], Passage 1984 132 [496,1-499,30], 148 [496,1-499,30], Poag 1987b 231 [496,1-499,30], Buschinger 2001a 322 [499,13-499,22] Quellen - Chrétien: Wilmotte 1932b 452 Anm. 2 [496,16-499,30], Rachbauer 1934 251-52 [499,11-499,30], Rachbauer 1970 251-52 [499,11-499,30], Rachbauer 1980 251-52 [499,11-499,30], Haug 1991 245 Anm. 16 [499,1-499,25], Haug 1997e 116 Anm. 16 [499,1-499,25] Rache: Möbius 1993 267 [499,15-499,16], 269 [499,13-499,16] Realismus: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Religion: Ehrismann, G. 1908 445-46 [499,11-502,30], Weber, G. 1935 28 [499,15-499,18], Mockenhaupt 1942 227 [499,16-499,17], Weber, G. 1948 66 Anm. 3, 207 [499,1-499,30], Wapnewski 1955 164 [498,1-499,30], Kahane, H. und Kahane, R. 1965 57 [495,7-499,30], Mockenhaupt 1968 227 [499,16-499,17], Wieners 1973 96, Groos 1974a 365 [499,14-499,16], Wapnewski 1982 164 [498,1-499,30] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Passage 1984 132 [496,1-499,30], 148 [496,1-499,30], Poag 1987b 231 [496,1-499,30], Keller, J. 1997 402 Anm. 293 [499,13-499,22] Ritterethik: Ehrismann, G. 1908 445-46 [499,11-502,30], Keferstein 1937a 85 Anm. 7 u. 8 [499,11-499,30], Mockenhaupt 1968 227 [499,16-499,17], Wieners 1973 96, Hunter 1982 97 [499,13-499,25] Ritterkampf u. Turnierwesen: Hunter 1982 97 [499,13-499,25] Schionatulander: Passage 1984 132 [496,1-499,30], 148 [496,1-499,30], Poag 1987b 231 [496,1-499,30] Schuld: Keferstein 1937a 85 Anm. 7 u. 8 [499,11-499,30], Mockenhaupt 1968 227 [499,16-499,17], Wieners 1973 96 Selbstverteidigung: Boigs 1992 13 Anm. 59 [499,11-499,25] Soziologie: Brall 1983b 281-82 [499,13-499,30], Pratelidis 1994 139 [499,13-499,22] Stil: Mergell 1943 235 [499,13-499,30], 241 [499,11-499,30] Sünde: Wapnewski 1955 164 [498,1-499,30], Mockenhaupt 1968 227 [499,16-499,17], Hunter 1982 97 [499,13-499,25], Wapnewski 1982 164 [498,1-499,30] Titurel: Passage 1984 132 [496,1-499,30], 148 [496,1-499,30], Poag 1987b 231 [496,1-499,30] Trevrizent: Blamires 1966 331 [499,11-499,22], Tax 1974a 120 [498,1-499,30] Überlieferung: Nellmann 1966 334, Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 101 [499,6-500,3], 126 [499,14-500,18], Rolle 2001 119, 120 Anm. 11 Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Schultheiß 1937 54 [499,15-499,18], Groos 1974a 365 [499,14-499,16], Delabar 1990 75 [498,13-499,22], Storp 1994 68 [499,14-499,16], Przybilski 2000a 58 [499,13-499,16] Waffen: Schröder, Werner 1971a 116 [499,13-499,16], Schröder, Werner 1989q 225 [499,13-499,16] Werkstruktur: Wapnewski 1955 164 [498,1-499,30], Acker 1979 51 Anm. 11 [499,1-499,30], Wapnewski 1982 164 [498,1-499,30] Willehalm: Przybilski 2000a 58 [499,13-499,16] Wortschatz: Schultheiß 1937 54 [499,15-499,18] Zahlenkomposition: Wapnewski 1955 164 [498,1-499,30], Acker 1979 51 Anm. 11 [499,1-499,30], Wapnewski 1982 164 [498,1-499,30] zwîvel: Wapnewski 1955 164 [498,1-499,30], Ito 1972 67 [499,16-499,22], Wapnewski 1982 164 [498,1-499,30]
	(zu den versspezifischen Angaben)