499,27 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben)
Adaptation: Hilka 1932 742 [499,26-499,30], Wilmotte 1932b 452 Anm. 2 [496,16-499,30], Rachbauer 1934 248 [499,26-499,27], 251-52 [499,11-499,30], Mergell 1943 235 [499,13-499,30], 241 [499,11-499,30], Rachbauer 1970 248 [499,26-499,27], 251-52 [499,11-499,30], Rachbauer 1980 248 [499,26-499,27], 251-52 [499,11-499,30] Alexanderlegende: Mergell 1951b 10 [499,27-499,30], 68 [499,27-499,30], Mergell 1952b 10 [499,27-499,30], 68 [499,27-499,30] Anfortas: Blamires 1966 335 [499,27-499,30], 341 Arbeit u. Tätigkeit: Otto 1993 112 [499,26-499,30], 159 Anm. 289 [499,26-499,30], 180 [499,26-499,30] Ausgabe: Nellmann 1994c 701, 703 [499,27-499,30] Ausgabenmethodik: Schirok 2003 399 [499,26-499,30] Bernhard von Clairvaux: Mergell 1952b 10 [499,27-499,30], 68 [499,27-499,30] Bibelmotivik: Duckworth 1980 286 [499,26-499,30], Murdoch 2000 96 Bildungsroman: Sauer, P. 2004 110 Anm. 266 [499,26-499,30] Blutstropfenepisode: Dewald 1975 282 [499,26-499,30], Bumke 2001a 90 Anm. 198 Buch IX: Faust 1903/04 290 [499,18-499,29], Tax 1974a 120 [498,1-499,30], 126 [499,26-499,30], Acker 1979 51 Anm. 11 [499,1-499,30], Neuendorff 1987a 280 [499,11-499,30], 288 [499,11-499,30], Faust 1903/04 290 [499,18-499,29] Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 335 [499,27-499,30], 341, Ortmann 1972 57 [499,26-499,30], 88 [499,26-499,30] Condwiramurs: Blamires 1966 335 [499,27-499,30], 341 Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 56 [499,19-499,28] Erzähltechnik: Mergell 1943 235 [499,13-499,30], 241 [499,11-499,30], Ortmann 1972 57 [499,26-499,30], 88 [499,26-499,30], Tax 1974a 120 [498,1-499,30], 126 [499,26-499,30], Dewald 1975 282 [499,26-499,30], Neuendorff 1987a 280 [499,11-499,30], 288 [499,11-499,30], Schu 2002 293 [499,26-499,30] Erziehung: Sauer, P. 2004 110 Anm. 266 [499,26-499,30] ethischer Wortschatz: San-Marte 1861 118 [499,26-499,30], 267 [499,27-499,30], Maurer 1951b 145, 156 [499,27-499,28], Wapnewski 1955 111, 164 [498,1-499,30], Duckworth 1980 286 [499,26-499,30], Wapnewski 1982 111, 164 [498,1-499,30] Feirefiz: Blamires 1966 335 [499,27-499,30], 341 Fiktionalität: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Forschungsbericht: Mergell 1953a 448 Anm. 31 [498,19-499,30], Lowet 1955 179 Gahmuret: Blamires 1966 335 [499,27-499,30], 341 Gattung: Haferland 1988 203 [499,26-499,30], Schu 2002 293 [499,26-499,30] Gawan: Blamires 1966 335 [499,27-499,30], 341 Gesamtwürdigung: Sacker 1963 110-11 [499,26-499,30], Kratz, H. 1973a 305 [499,19-499,30], Bumke 2004 93 Geschichte: Heer 1952 360 [499,20-499,30], Roßkopf 1972 355 Anm. 2 [499,26-499,30], Passage 1984 132 [496,1-499,30], 148 [496,1-499,30], Poag 1987b 231 [496,1-499,30] Gottfried von Straßburg: Bayer, Hans 1978 45 [499,26-499,30] Gral: San-Marte 1861 118 [499,26-499,30], 267 [499,27-499,30], Birch-Hirschfeld 1877 269 [499,27-499,30], Golther 1925a 183 [499,19-499,30], Burdach 1938 520 [499,26-499,30], Weber, G. 1948 61 [499,17-499,30], 72 [499,27-499,30], 207 [499,1-499,30], Mergell 1951b 10 [499,27-499,30], 68 [499,27-499,30], Mergell 1952b 10 [499,27-499,30], 68 [499,27-499,30], Kahane, H. und Kahane, R. 1965 57 [495,7-499,30], 72 [499,26-499,30], Mockenhaupt 1968 31 [499,26-499,30], 102 [499,26-499,30], 107 [499,26-499,27], 183, 227 [499,27-499,30], Burdach 1974 520 [499,26-499,30], Dewald 1975 282 [499,26-499,30], Bayer, Hans 1983 135 [499,26-499,30] Hartmann von Aue: Wapnewski 1955 111, 164 [498,1-499,30], Wapnewski 1982 111, 164 [498,1-499,30] Herzeloyde: Blamires 1966 335 [499,27-499,30], 341 heterodoxe Einflüsse: Kahane, H. und Kahane, R. 1965 57 [495,7-499,30], 72 [499,26-499,30], Bayer, Hans 1978 45 [499,26-499,30], Wareman, P 1981 103 höfischer Roman: Haferland 1988 203 [499,26-499,30], Schu 2002 293 [499,26-499,30] höfisches Leben: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Individualität: Blamires 1966 335 [499,27-499,30], 341 indoeur. Mythologie: Pastré 1993c 390, 398 [499,26-499,30] Interpretation: Weber, G. 1948 61 [499,17-499,30], 72 [499,27-499,30], 207 [499,1-499,30], Maurer 1951b 145, 156 [499,27-499,28], Heer 1952 360 [499,20-499,30], Richter, J. 1953 18 [499,27-499,30], Kuhn, H. 1956 170 [499,27-499,30], Kuhn, H. 1959c 156 [499,27-499,30], Kuhn, H. 1969c 156 [499,27-499,30], Johnson, S. 1970a 113 [499,26-499,30], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Roßkopf 1972 355 Anm. 2 [499,26-499,30], Dewald 1975 282 [499,26-499,30], Gibbs 1979 202 [499,26-499,30], Brall 1983b 281-82 [499,13-499,30], Passage 1984 132 [496,1-499,30], 148 [496,1-499,30], Poag 1987b 231 [496,1-499,30], Haferland 1988 203 [499,26-499,30], Schäfer, J. 1996 52 [499,27-499,28], Faust 1903/04 290 [499,18-499,29] Ither: Roßkopf 1972 355 Anm. 2 [499,26-499,30] Jenseitsmotive: Braches 1961 231 Anm. 959 [499,27-499,30] Jüngerer Titurel: Passage 1984 132 [496,1-499,30], 148 [496,1-499,30], Poag 1987b 231 [496,1-499,30], Guggenberger 1992 191 Kommentar: Nellmann 1994c 701, 703 [499,27-499,30], Gilmour 2000 173 Kommentarmethodik: Schirok 2003 399 [499,26-499,30] Kyot: Mergell 1951b 10 [499,27-499,30], 68 [499,27-499,30], Mergell 1952b 10 [499,27-499,30], 68 [499,27-499,30], Lowet 1955 179, Kahane, H. und Kahane, R. 1965 57 [495,7-499,30], 72 [499,26-499,30] Lichtmetaphorik: Cessari 2000 124 [499,26-499,30] Literaturgeschichte: Ehrismann, G. 1927 259 [499,27-499,30] Longinuslegende: Burdach 1938 520 [499,26-499,30], Burdach 1974 520 [499,26-499,30] Metaphorik u. Bildlichkeit: Böckmann 1949 157 [499,17-499,30] Minne u. Ehe: Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952b 60 [499,17-499,30], 64 [499,27-499,30], Wapnewski 1955 111, 164 [498,1-499,30], Willson, H. 1968 201 [499,26-499,30], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Dewald 1975 282 [499,26-499,30], Wapnewski 1982 111, 164 [498,1-499,30], Guggenberger 1992 191, Kleber, J. 1992b 315 [499,26-499,30] Namen: Passage 1984 132 [496,1-499,30], 148 [496,1-499,30], Poag 1987b 231 [496,1-499,30] Pädagogik: Sauer, P. 2004 110 Anm. 266 [499,26-499,30] Parzival: Blamires 1966 335 [499,27-499,30], 341 Philologie: Kruse, A. und Rössler, G. 1991 139 [499,27-499,30] Politik: Heer 1952 360 [499,20-499,30] Prolog: Wapnewski 1955 111, 164 [498,1-499,30], Wapnewski 1982 111, 164 [498,1-499,30] Quellen - allgemein: Golther 1925a 183 [499,19-499,30], Burdach 1938 520 [499,26-499,30], Mergell 1951b 10 [499,27-499,30], 68 [499,27-499,30], Mergell 1952b 10 [499,27-499,30], 68 [499,27-499,30], Kahane, H. und Kahane, R. 1965 57 [495,7-499,30], 72 [499,26-499,30], Burdach 1974 520 [499,26-499,30], Passage 1984 132 [496,1-499,30], 148 [496,1-499,30], Poag 1987b 231 [496,1-499,30] Quellen - Chrétien: Birch-Hirschfeld 1877 269 [499,27-499,30], Wilmotte 1932b 452 Anm. 2 [496,16-499,30], Rachbauer 1934 248 [499,26-499,27], 251-52 [499,11-499,30], Rachbauer 1970 248 [499,26-499,27], 251-52 [499,11-499,30], Rachbauer 1980 248 [499,26-499,27], 251-52 [499,11-499,30] Rache: Möbius 1993 268 [499,26-499,30], 269 [499,26-499,27] Realismus: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Religion: San-Marte 1861 118 [499,26-499,30], 267 [499,27-499,30], Sattler 1895 76 [499,19-499,30], Ehrismann, G. 1908 445-46 [499,11-502,30], Weisweiler 1930 260, Mockenhaupt 1942 31 [499,26-499,30], 102 [499,26-499,30], 107 [499,26-499,27], 183, 227 [499,27-499,30], Weber, G. 1948 61 [499,17-499,30], 72 [499,27-499,30], 207 [499,1-499,30], Mergell 1952b 10 [499,27-499,30], 68 [499,27-499,30], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952b 60 [499,17-499,30], 64 [499,27-499,30], Lowet 1955 179, Wapnewski 1955 111, 164 [498,1-499,30], Meissburger 1962c 22 [499,26-499,30], Kahane, H. und Kahane, R. 1965 57 [495,7-499,30], 72 [499,26-499,30], Mockenhaupt 1968 31 [499,26-499,30], 102 [499,26-499,30], 107 [499,26-499,27], 183, 227 [499,27-499,30], Willson, H. 1968 201 [499,26-499,30], Dimler 1970 123 [499,26-499,30], Duckworth 1980 286 [499,26-499,30], Wareman, P 1981 103, Wapnewski 1982 111, 164 [498,1-499,30], Bayer, Hans 1983 135 [499,26-499,30], Schäfer, J. 1996 52 [499,27-499,28], Cessari 2000 124 [499,26-499,30] Rezeption (allgemein): Golther 1925a 183 [499,19-499,30] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Passage 1984 132 [496,1-499,30], 148 [496,1-499,30], Poag 1987b 231 [496,1-499,30], Guggenberger 1992 191 Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Wasielewski-Knecht 1993 102 [499,20-499,30] Ritterethik: Ehrismann, G. 1908 445-46 [499,11-502,30], Keferstein 1937a 85 Anm. 7 u. 8 [499,11-499,30], Maurer 1951b 145, 156 [499,27-499,28], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952b 60 [499,17-499,30], 64 [499,27-499,30], Lowet 1955 179, Mockenhaupt 1968 31 [499,26-499,30], 102 [499,26-499,30], 107 [499,26-499,27], 183, 227 [499,27-499,30] Rittertum: Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952b 60 [499,17-499,30], 64 [499,27-499,30] Schionatulander: Passage 1984 132 [496,1-499,30], 148 [496,1-499,30], Poag 1987b 231 [496,1-499,30] Schuld: Keferstein 1937a 85 Anm. 7 u. 8 [499,11-499,30], Maurer 1950 327, 337 [499,27-499,28], Maurer 1966 78, 92 [499,27-499,28], Mockenhaupt 1968 31 [499,26-499,30], 102 [499,26-499,30], 107 [499,26-499,27], 183, 227 [499,27-499,30], Nowak 1968b 46 [499,27-499,30], Dimler 1970 123 [499,26-499,30], Wareman, P 1981 103 Sexuelles u. Geschlechterbeziehungen: Bayer, Hans 1983 135 [499,26-499,30] Soziologie: Brall 1983b 281-82 [499,13-499,30] Sprache: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 56 [499,19-499,28], Böckmann 1949 157 [499,17-499,30], Dewald 1975 282 [499,26-499,30] Sprachgeschichte: Maurer 1951b 145, 156 [499,27-499,28] Stil: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 56 [499,19-499,28], Mergell 1943 235 [499,13-499,30], 241 [499,11-499,30], Kutzner 1975 118 [499,26-499,30] Subjektivität: Dewald 1975 282 [499,26-499,30] Sünde: Maurer 1950 327, 337 [499,27-499,28], Maurer 1951b 145, 156 [499,27-499,28], Wapnewski 1955 111, 164 [498,1-499,30], Maurer 1966 78, 92 [499,27-499,28], Mockenhaupt 1968 31 [499,26-499,30], 102 [499,26-499,30], 107 [499,26-499,27], 183, 227 [499,27-499,30], Wapnewski 1982 111, 164 [498,1-499,30] Titurel: Passage 1984 132 [496,1-499,30], 148 [496,1-499,30], Poag 1987b 231 [496,1-499,30], Schirok 2003 399 [499,26-499,30] Traummotivik: Roßkopf 1972 355 Anm. 2 [499,26-499,30], Speckenbach 1976 191 [499,19-499,30] Trevrizent: Blamires 1966 335 [499,27-499,30], 341, Tax 1974a 120 [498,1-499,30], 126 [499,26-499,30] triuwe: Kruse, A. und Rössler, G. 1991 139 [499,27-499,30] tumpheit: Haas, A. 1964 258 [499,26-499,30], 259 [499,26-499,30], 288 [499,26-499,30] Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 101 [499,6-500,3], 126 [499,14-500,18] Übersetzung: Nellmann 1994c 701, 703 [499,27-499,30] Übersetzungsproblematik: Schirok 2003 399 [499,26-499,30] Verskunst: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 56 [499,19-499,28] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Schultheiß 1937 53 [499,20-499,30], Delabar 1990 305 elterngeschichte)/Vorgeschichte (Gahmuret/Elterngeschichte): Lowet 1955 179 Wahrnehmung, Blick usw: Bumke 2001a 90 Anm. 198 Werkstruktur: Wapnewski 1955 111, 164 [498,1-499,30], Acker 1979 51 Anm. 11 [499,1-499,30], Wapnewski 1982 111, 164 [498,1-499,30], Pastré 1993c 390, 398 [499,26-499,30], Faust 1903/04 290 [499,18-499,29] Wirtschaft u. Handel: Otto 1993 112 [499,26-499,30], 159 Anm. 289 [499,26-499,30], 180 [499,26-499,30] Wortschatz: Weisweiler 1930 260, Schultheiß 1937 53 [499,20-499,30] Zahlenkomposition: Wapnewski 1955 111, 164 [498,1-499,30], Acker 1979 51 Anm. 11 [499,1-499,30], Wapnewski 1982 111, 164 [498,1-499,30] zwîvel: Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952b 60 [499,17-499,30], 64 [499,27-499,30], Wapnewski 1955 111, 164 [498,1-499,30], Duckworth 1980 286 [499,26-499,30], Wapnewski 1982 111, 164 [498,1-499,30]
	(zu den versspezifischen Angaben)