502, 8 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben)
Adaptation: Hilka 1932 742 [502,4-502,22], Rachbauer 1934 252 [502,4-502,22], Kellermann, W. 1936 115 [502,4-502,22], Fourquet 1938b 189 Anm. 1 [500,23-502,30], Snelleman 1941 130 [502,7-502,12], Mergell 1943 238 [502,4-502,22], Rachbauer 1970 252 [502,4-502,22], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1975a 114 [502,7-502,22], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1978j 333 [502,7-502,22], Rachbauer 1980 252 [502,4-502,22], Pérennec 1984f 249 [502,7-502,8] Alexanderlegende: Mergell 1952b 112-13 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22] Anfortas: Blamires 1966 300 [502,7-502,12] Artusepik: Pérennec 1984f 249 [502,7-502,8] Bernhard von Clairvaux: Mergell 1952a 94-95 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22], Mergell 1952b 112-13 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22] Bibelmotivik: Duckworth 1980 130 [502,4-502,22] Blutstropfenepisode: Bumke 2001a 89 Anm. 195 [502,4-502,22] Buch IX: Faust 1903/04 286 [501,19-502,30], Horacek 1972 226 [500,1-502,28], Neuendorff 1987a 289 [502,4-502,22], 290 [501,19-502,30], Faust 1903/04 286 [501,19-502,30] Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 300 [502,7-502,12] Condwiramurs: Blamires 1966 300 [502,7-502,12] Didaktik u. Lehrdichtung: Boesch 1977 185 [502,4-502,22] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Lampe 1990 188-89 [502,4-502,14] Erzähler: Bradley, R. 1981 227 Anm. 22 [502,4-502,8] Erzähltechnik: Mergell 1943 238 [502,4-502,22], Hirschberg 1976 252 Anm. 28 [501,19-502,30], Bradley, R. 1981 227 Anm. 22 [502,4-502,8], Parshall 1981 255 Anm. 50 [502,7-502,22], 274 Anm. 104 [502,4-502,12], Neuendorff 1987a 289 [502,4-502,22], 290 [501,19-502,30] ethischer Wortschatz: San-Marte 1861 126 [502,7-502,22], 242 [502,7-502,22], Emmel 1936 49 [501,17-502,22], Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Duckworth 1980 130 [502,4-502,22], Emmel 1980 49 [501,17-502,22], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22] Farben u. Farbensymbolik: Mieder 2004 238 [502,7-502,8], 265 [502,7-502,8] Feirefiz: Blamires 1966 300 [502,7-502,12] Fiktionalität: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Forschungsbericht: Mergell 1953a 434 Anm. 7 [502,4-502,22] Frauen (allgemein): Lofmark 1974b 55 [502,4-502,9], Blumstein 1977 39 [502,6-502,9] Frauenfiguren: Lofmark 1974b 55 [502,4-502,9] Fuetrer, Ulrich: Nyholm 1964 195 [502,4-502,30] Gahmuret: Blamires 1966 300 [502,7-502,12] Gattung: Haferland 1988 203 [502,4-502,22], 329 Anm. 197 [502,4-502,22] Gawan: Blamires 1966 300 [502,7-502,12] Gesamtwürdigung: Kratz, H. 1973a 306 [502,4-502,22], Bumke 1997a 108 [501,22-502,22], Reichert, H. 2002 192-93 [502,7-502,22] Geschichte: Snelleman 1941 130 [502,7-502,12], Heer 1952 361 [502,4-502,22] Gral: San-Marte 1861 126 [502,7-502,22], 242 [502,7-502,22], Golther 1925a 178 [502,4-502,22], Burdach 1938 521 [502,7-502,8], Weber, G. 1948 67 [501,1-502,30], 124 [501,1-502,30], Mergell 1952a 94-95 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22], Mergell 1952b 112-13 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22], Mockenhaupt 1968 255 [502,7-502,9], Burdach 1974 521 [502,7-502,8] Handschriftliches: Lampe 1990 188-89 [502,4-502,14] Hartmann von Aue: Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22] Heidentum: San-Marte 1862b 120 [502,4-502,9], 171-72 Anm. [502,4-502,9] Herzeloyde: Blamires 1966 300 [502,7-502,12] heterodoxe Einflüsse: Katann 1957/58 324 [501,1-502,30], 325 [502,1-502,30], Zeydel 1953b 30 [502,4-502,28], Katann 1957/58 324 [501,1-502,30], 325 [502,1-502,30] höfischer Roman: Blumstein 1977 39 [502,6-502,9], Haferland 1988 203 [502,4-502,22], 329 Anm. 197 [502,4-502,22] höfisches Leben: Mersmann 1971 284, Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Humanismus: Weber, R. 1918 386 [502,4-502,22], 388 [502,4-502,22] Individualität: Blamires 1966 300 [502,7-502,12] Interpretation: Weber, G. 1948 67 [501,1-502,30], 124 [501,1-502,30], Heer 1952 361 [502,4-502,22], Richter, J. 1953 13 [502,4-502,12], Mersmann 1971 284, Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Blumstein 1977 39 [502,6-502,9], Bradley, R. 1981 227 Anm. 22 [502,4-502,8], Pérennec 1984f 249 [502,7-502,8], Wynn 1984 296 [502,4-502,22], Haferland 1988 203 [502,4-502,22], 329 Anm. 197 [502,4-502,22], Haug 1990 210 [502,4-502,22], Lampe 1990 188-89 [502,4-502,14], Morrison 1990 127 [502,4-502,8], Haug 1997f 134 [502,4-502,22], Faust 1903/04 286 [501,19-502,30] Jüngerer Titurel: San-Marte 1863 426 [502,7-502,22], San-Marte 1872d 181 [502,7-502,22], Parshall 1981 255 Anm. 50 [502,7-502,22], 274 Anm. 104 [502,4-502,12] Kommentar: Joos und Whitesell 1951 142, Decke-Cornill 1985 229 [502,7-502,8], Gilmour 2000 167 [502,7-502,22] Kyot: Mergell 1952b 112-13 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22], Zeydel 1953b 30 [502,4-502,28] Literaturgeschichte: Bertau 1972/73 976 [501,11-502,30], Ehrismann, G. 1927 258 [502,4-502,22], Bertau 1972/73 976 [501,11-502,30] Longinuslegende: Burdach 1938 521 [502,7-502,8], Burdach 1974 521 [502,7-502,8] Metaphorik u. Bildlichkeit: Mieder 2004 238 [502,7-502,8], 265 [502,7-502,8] Minne u. Ehe: San-Marte 1862b 120 [502,4-502,9], 171-72 Anm. [502,4-502,9], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952b 75-76 [502,7-502,22], 172 [502,7-502,22], Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Willson, H. 1968 201, Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22], Kleber, J. 1992b 74 Anm. 38 [502,4-502,8] Orient: Snelleman 1941 130 [502,7-502,12] Pädagogik: Venne 1999 322 [502,7-502,9] Parzival: Blamires 1966 300 [502,7-502,12] Politik: Heer 1952 361 [502,4-502,22] Prolog: Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Blumstein 1977 39 [502,6-502,9], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22] Quellen - allgemein: Golther 1925a 178 [502,4-502,22], Burdach 1938 521 [502,7-502,8], Fourquet 1938b 189 Anm. 1 [500,23-502,30], Snelleman 1941 130 [502,7-502,12], Mergell 1952a 94-95 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22], Mergell 1952b 112-13 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22], Burdach 1974 521 [502,7-502,8] Quellen - Chrétien: Rachbauer 1934 252 [502,4-502,22], Fourquet 1938b 189 Anm. 1 [500,23-502,30], Rachbauer 1970 252 [502,4-502,22], Rachbauer 1980 252 [502,4-502,22] Rache: Möbius 1993 271 [502,7-502,8] Realismus: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Redewendungen, Formelhaftes usw: Mieder 2004 238 [502,7-502,8], 265 [502,7-502,8] Reichtum u. materialer Besitz: Mersmann 1971 284 Religion: San-Marte 1861 126 [502,7-502,22], 242 [502,7-502,22], San-Marte 1863 426 [502,7-502,22], San-Marte 1872d 181 [502,7-502,22], Sattler 1895 84 [502,7-502,12], Ehrismann, G. 1908 445-46 [499,11-502,30], Weber, R. 1918 386 [502,4-502,22], 388 [502,4-502,22], Weber, G. 1935 43 [502,7-502,9], Mockenhaupt 1942 255 [502,7-502,9], Weber, G. 1948 67 [501,1-502,30], 124 [501,1-502,30], Mergell 1952a 94-95 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22], Mergell 1952b 112-13 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952b 75-76 [502,7-502,22], 172 [502,7-502,22], Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Koppitz 1959 103 [502,7-502,10], Mockenhaupt 1968 255 [502,7-502,9], Willson, H. 1968 201, Duckworth 1980 130 [502,4-502,22], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22], Lampe 1990 188-89 [502,4-502,14] Rezeption (allgemein): Golther 1925a 178 [502,4-502,22] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 195 [502,4-502,30], Parshall 1981 255 Anm. 50 [502,7-502,22], 274 Anm. 104 [502,4-502,12] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Kreis 1995 94 [502,4-502,22] Ritterethik: San-Marte 1862b 120 [502,4-502,9], 171-72 Anm. [502,4-502,9], Ehrismann, G. 1908 445-46 [499,11-502,30], Keferstein 1937a 87 Anm. 5 et seq. [502,4-502,22], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952b 75-76 [502,7-502,22], 172 [502,7-502,22], Mockenhaupt 1968 255 [502,7-502,9] Ritterkampf u. Turnierwesen: San-Marte 1862b 120 [502,4-502,9], 171-72 Anm. [502,4-502,9] Rittertum: San-Marte 1862b 120 [502,4-502,9], 171-72 Anm. [502,4-502,9], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952b 75-76 [502,7-502,22], 172 [502,7-502,22] Schuld: Kellermann, W. 1936 115 [502,4-502,22], Keferstein 1937a 87 Anm. 5 et seq. [502,4-502,22], Mockenhaupt 1968 255 [502,7-502,9] Sprache: San-Marte 1862b 120 [502,4-502,9], 171-72 Anm. [502,4-502,9] Sprichwörter u. Sentenzen: Mieder 2004 238 [502,7-502,8], 265 [502,7-502,8] Steiner, Rudolf (Anthroposophie): Lampe 1990 188-89 [502,4-502,14] Stil: Riemer, G. 1906 67, Mergell 1943 238 [502,4-502,22], Kutzner 1975 118 [502,7-502,8], Mieder 2004 238 [502,7-502,8], 265 [502,7-502,8] Sünde: Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Mockenhaupt 1968 255 [502,7-502,9], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22] Teilausgabe: Joos und Whitesell 1951 142 Trevrizent: Blamires 1966 300 [502,7-502,12] triuwe: Emmel 1936 49 [501,17-502,22], Emmel 1980 49 [501,17-502,22] Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 101 [501,21-502,19], 126 [502,4-503,8] Übersetzung: San-Marte 1858b LXXXIII [502,7-502,9] Wagner, Richard: Kreis 1995 94 [502,4-502,22] Wahrnehmung, Blick usw: Bumke 2001a 89 Anm. 195 [502,4-502,22] Werkstruktur: Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Horacek 1972 226 [500,1-502,28], Hirschberg 1976 252 Anm. 28 [501,19-502,30], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22], Faust 1903/04 286 [501,19-502,30] Willehalm: Knapp, F. 1970 8 Anm. 20 [502,7-502,12], Decke-Cornill 1985 229 [502,7-502,8] Wissenschaftsgeschichte: Joos und Whitesell 1951 142 Wortschatz: San-Marte 1862b 120 [502,4-502,9], 171-72 Anm. [502,4-502,9], Riemer, G. 1906 67, Kotzenberg 1907 76 [502,7-502,8], Mersmann 1971 284 Zahlenkomposition: Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22], Lampe 1990 188-89 [502,4-502,14] zwîvel: Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952b 75-76 [502,7-502,22], 172 [502,7-502,22], Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Duckworth 1980 130 [502,4-502,22], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22]
	(zu den versspezifischen Angaben)