502,14 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben) 
Adaptation: Hilka 1932 742 [502,4-502,22], Rachbauer 1934 252 [502,4-502,22], Kellermann, W. 1936 115 [502,4-502,22], Fourquet 1938b 189 Anm. 1 [500,23-502,30], Mergell 1943 238 [502,4-502,22], Rachbauer 1970 252 [502,4-502,22], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1975a 114 [502,7-502,22], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1978j 333 [502,7-502,22], Rachbauer 1980 252 [502,4-502,22]
Alexanderlegende: Mergell 1952b 112-13 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22]
Anfortas: Blamires 1966 334 Anm. 1 [502,14-502,15]
Ausgabe: Weber, G. 1981 851 Anm. 182 [502,12-502,19], Nellmann 1994c 703 [502,9-502,22]
Bernhard von Clairvaux: Mergell 1952a 94-95 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22], Mergell 1952b 112-13 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22]
Bibelmotivik: Duckworth 1980 130 [502,4-502,22], Murdoch 2000 97 [502,12-502,19]
Bildungsroman: Gerhard 1926 14 Anm. 1 [502,13-502,22], Gerhard 1968 14 Anm. 1 [502,13-502,22], Sauer, P. 2000 250 [502,9-502,14]
Blutstropfenepisode: Bumke 2001a 89 Anm. 195 [502,4-502,22]
Briefe u. Schriftwechsel: Reuvekamp-Felber 2003 306 [502,9-502,22]
Buch IX: Faust 1903/04 286 [501,19-502,30], Horacek 1972 226 [500,1-502,28], Neuendorff 1987a 289 [502,4-502,22], 290 [501,19-502,30], Faust 1903/04 286 [501,19-502,30]
Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 334 Anm. 1 [502,14-502,15]
Condwiramurs: Blamires 1966 334 Anm. 1 [502,14-502,15]
Didaktik u. Lehrdichtung: Boesch 1977 185 [502,4-502,22]
Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Lampe 1990 188-89 [502,4-502,14]
Erzähler: Reuvekamp-Felber 2003 306 [502,9-502,22]
Erzähltechnik: Mergell 1943 238 [502,4-502,22], Hirschberg 1976 252 Anm. 28 [501,19-502,30], Parshall 1981 255 Anm. 50 [502,7-502,22], Neuendorff 1987a 289 [502,4-502,22], 290 [501,19-502,30]
Erziehung: Sauer, P. 2000 250 [502,9-502,14], Reuvekamp-Felber 2003 306 [502,9-502,22]
ethischer Wortschatz: San-Marte 1861 126 [502,7-502,22], 242 [502,7-502,22], Emmel 1936 49 [501,17-502,22], Heckel, H. 1939 16-17 Anm. 19 [502,13-502,14], 17 Anm. 20 [502,9-502,22], Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Duckworth 1980 130 [502,4-502,22], Emmel 1980 49 [501,17-502,22], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22]
Feirefiz: Blamires 1966 334 Anm. 1 [502,14-502,15]
Fiktionalität: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26]
Forschungsbericht: Mergell 1953a 434 Anm. 7 [502,4-502,22]
Fuetrer, Ulrich: Nyholm 1964 195 [502,4-502,30]
Gahmuret: Blamires 1966 334 Anm. 1 [502,14-502,15]
Gattung: Haferland 1988 203 [502,4-502,22], 329 Anm. 197 [502,4-502,22]
Gawan: Blamires 1966 334 Anm. 1 [502,14-502,15]
Gesamtwürdigung: Sacker 1963 153 [502,13-502,22], Kratz, H. 1973a 306 [502,4-502,22], Bumke 1997a 108 [501,22-502,22], Reichert, H. 2002 192-93 [502,7-502,22]
Geschichte: Schreiber, A. 1928 7 [502,13-502,14], Heer 1952 361 [502,4-502,22]
Gral: San-Marte 1861 126 [502,7-502,22], 242 [502,7-502,22], Golther 1925a 178 [502,4-502,22], Weber, G. 1948 36 Anm. 2 [502,12-502,22], 67 [501,1-502,30], 71 [502,13-502,14], 124 [501,1-502,30], 131 [502,10-502,22], Mergell 1952a 94-95 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22], Mergell 1952b 112-13 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22], Mockenhaupt 1968 255 [502,13-502,14]
Handschriftliches: Lampe 1990 188-89 [502,4-502,14]
Hartmann von Aue: Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22]
Herzeloyde: Blamires 1966 334 Anm. 1 [502,14-502,15]
heterodoxe Einflüsse: Katann 1957/58 324 [501,1-502,30], 325 [502,1-502,30], Zeydel 1953b 30 [502,4-502,28], Katann 1957/58 324 [501,1-502,30], 325 [502,1-502,30]
höfischer Roman: Haferland 1988 203 [502,4-502,22], 329 Anm. 197 [502,4-502,22]
höfisches Leben: Wessels, P. 1952 15 Anm. 34 [502,10-502,22], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Reuvekamp-Felber 2003 306 [502,9-502,22]
Hofkleriker: Reuvekamp-Felber 2003 306 [502,9-502,22]
Humanismus: Weber, R. 1918 386 [502,4-502,22], 388 [502,4-502,22]
Individualität: Blamires 1966 334 Anm. 1 [502,14-502,15]
Interpretation: Weber, G. 1948 36 Anm. 2 [502,12-502,22], 67 [501,1-502,30], 71 [502,13-502,14], 124 [501,1-502,30], 131 [502,10-502,22], Heer 1952 361 [502,4-502,22], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Weber, G. 1981 851 Anm. 182 [502,12-502,19], Wynn 1984 296 [502,4-502,22], Haferland 1988 203 [502,4-502,22], 329 Anm. 197 [502,4-502,22], Haug 1990 210 [502,4-502,22], Lampe 1990 188-89 [502,4-502,14], Liebertz-Grün 1993a 106 [502,13-502,22], Haug 1997f 134 [502,4-502,22], Faust 1903/04 286 [501,19-502,30]
Jüngerer Titurel: San-Marte 1863 426 [502,7-502,22], San-Marte 1872d 181 [502,7-502,22], Parshall 1981 255 Anm. 50 [502,7-502,22]
Kommentar: Nellmann 1994c 703 [502,9-502,22], Gilmour 2000 167 [502,7-502,22]
Kyot: Schreiber, A. 1928 7 [502,13-502,14], Mergell 1952b 112-13 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22], Zeydel 1953b 30 [502,4-502,28]
Legende: Wessels, P. 1955 114 [502,10-502,22], Wessels, P. 1966 235 [502,10-502,22]
Literaturgeschichte: Bertau 1972/73 976 [501,11-502,30], Ehrismann, G. 1927 258 [502,4-502,22], Bertau 1972/73 976 [501,11-502,30]
Minne u. Ehe: Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952b 75-76 [502,7-502,22], 172 [502,7-502,22], Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22]
Nacherzählung: Weber, G. 1981 851 Anm. 182 [502,12-502,19]
Pädagogik: Sauer, P. 2000 250 [502,9-502,14]
Parzival: Blamires 1966 334 Anm. 1 [502,14-502,15]
Politik: Heer 1952 361 [502,4-502,22]
Prolog: Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22]
Quellen - allgemein: Golther 1925a 178 [502,4-502,22], Schreiber, A. 1928 7 [502,13-502,14], Fourquet 1938b 189 Anm. 1 [500,23-502,30], Mergell 1952a 94-95 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22], Mergell 1952b 112-13 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22], Wessels, P. 1955 114 [502,10-502,22], Wessels, P. 1966 235 [502,10-502,22]
Quellen - Chrétien: Rachbauer 1934 252 [502,4-502,22], Fourquet 1938b 189 Anm. 1 [500,23-502,30], Rachbauer 1970 252 [502,4-502,22], Rachbauer 1980 252 [502,4-502,22]
Rätsel: Tomasek 1994 258 [502,13-502,16]
Realismus: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26]
Religion: San-Marte 1861 126 [502,7-502,22], 242 [502,7-502,22], San-Marte 1863 426 [502,7-502,22], San-Marte 1872d 181 [502,7-502,22], Sattler 1895 85 [502,13-502,14], Ehrismann, G. 1908 445-46 [499,11-502,30], Weber, R. 1918 386 [502,4-502,22], 388 [502,4-502,22], Weber, G. 1935 43 [502,13-502,14], Mockenhaupt 1942 255 [502,13-502,14], Weber, G. 1948 36 Anm. 2 [502,12-502,22], 67 [501,1-502,30], 71 [502,13-502,14], 124 [501,1-502,30], 131 [502,10-502,22], Mergell 1952a 94-95 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22], Mergell 1952b 112-13 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952b 75-76 [502,7-502,22], 172 [502,7-502,22], Wessels, P. 1952 15 Anm. 34 [502,10-502,22], Bayerschmidt 1954 217 [502,9-502,22], Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Wessels, P. 1955 114 [502,10-502,22], Koppitz 1959 317 [502,13-502,19], Wessels, P. 1966 235 [502,10-502,22], Mockenhaupt 1968 255 [502,13-502,14], Duckworth 1980 130 [502,4-502,22], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22], Lampe 1990 188-89 [502,4-502,14], Murdoch 1999a 156 [502,12-502,19]
Rezeption (allgemein): Golther 1925a 178 [502,4-502,22]
Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 195 [502,4-502,30], Parshall 1981 255 Anm. 50 [502,7-502,22]
Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Kreis 1995 94 [502,4-502,22], Wagemann 1998 76 [502,9-502,22]
Ritterethik: Ehrismann, G. 1908 445-46 [499,11-502,30], Keferstein 1937a 87 Anm. 5 et seq. [502,4-502,22], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952b 75-76 [502,7-502,22], 172 [502,7-502,22], Mockenhaupt 1968 255 [502,13-502,14]
Rittertum: Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952b 75-76 [502,7-502,22], 172 [502,7-502,22], Wessels, P. 1952 15 Anm. 34 [502,10-502,22]
Schuld: Kellermann, W. 1936 115 [502,4-502,22], Keferstein 1937a 87 Anm. 5 et seq. [502,4-502,22], Mockenhaupt 1968 255 [502,13-502,14]
Steiner, Rudolf (Anthroposophie): Lampe 1990 188-89 [502,4-502,14], Forward 1994a 10 [502,12-502,14]
Stil: Mergell 1943 238 [502,4-502,22]
Sünde: Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Mockenhaupt 1968 255 [502,13-502,14], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22]
Trevrizent: Blamires 1966 334 Anm. 1 [502,14-502,15]
triuwe: Emmel 1936 49 [501,17-502,22], Emmel 1980 49 [501,17-502,22]
Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 101 [501,21-502,19], 126 [502,4-503,8]
Übersetzung: San-Marte 1858b XCVII [502,9-502,23], Nellmann 1994c 703 [502,9-502,22]
Wagner, Richard: Kreis 1995 94 [502,4-502,22]
Wahrnehmung, Blick usw: Bumke 2001a 89 Anm. 195 [502,4-502,22]
Werkstruktur: Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Horacek 1972 226 [500,1-502,28], Hirschberg 1976 252 Anm. 28 [501,19-502,30], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22], Faust 1903/04 286 [501,19-502,30]
Wortsinn: Weber, G. 1981 851 Anm. 182 [502,12-502,19]
Zahlenkomposition: Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22], Lampe 1990 188-89 [502,4-502,14]
zwîvel: Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952b 75-76 [502,7-502,22], 172 [502,7-502,22], Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Duckworth 1980 130 [502,4-502,22], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22]
 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben)