502,18 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben) 
Adaptation: Hilka 1932 742 [502,4-502,22], Rachbauer 1934 252 [502,4-502,22], Kellermann, W. 1936 115 [502,4-502,22], Fourquet 1938b 189 Anm. 1 [500,23-502,30], Mergell 1943 238 [502,4-502,22], Rachbauer 1970 252 [502,4-502,22], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1975a 114 [502,7-502,22], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1978j 333 [502,7-502,22], Rachbauer 1980 252 [502,4-502,22]
Alexanderlegende: Mergell 1952b 112-13 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22]
Ausgabe: Weber, G. 1981 851 Anm. 182 [502,12-502,19], Nellmann 1994c 703, [502,9-502,22]
Bernhard von Clairvaux: Mergell 1952a 94-95 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22], Mergell 1952b 112-13 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22]
Bibelmotivik: Duckworth 1980 130 [502,4-502,22], Murdoch 2000 97 [502,12-502,19]
Bildungsroman: Gerhard 1926 14 Anm. 1 [502,13-502,22], Gerhard 1968 14 Anm. 1 [502,13-502,22], Sauer, P. 2002 460 [502,15-502,19]
Blutstropfenepisode: Bumke 2001a 89 Anm. 195 [502,4-502,22]
Briefe u. Schriftwechsel: Reuvekamp-Felber 2003 306 [502,9-502,22]
Buch IX: Faust 1903/04 286 [501,19-502,30], Horacek 1972 226 [500,1-502,28], Neuendorff 1987a 289 [502,4-502,22], 290 [501,19-502,30], Faust 1903/04 286 [501,19-502,30]
Didaktik u. Lehrdichtung: Boesch 1977 185 [502,4-502,22]
Erzähler: Reuvekamp-Felber 2003 306 [502,9-502,22]
Erzähltechnik: Mergell 1943 238 [502,4-502,22], Hirschberg 1976 252 Anm. 28 [501,19-502,30], Parshall 1981 255 Anm. 50 [502,7-502,22], Neuendorff 1987a 289 [502,4-502,22], 290 [501,19-502,30]
Erziehung: Sauer, P. 2002 460 [502,15-502,19], Reuvekamp-Felber 2003 306 [502,9-502,22]
ethischer Wortschatz: San-Marte 1861 126 [502,7-502,22], 242 [502,7-502,22], Emmel 1936 49 [501,17-502,22], Heckel, H. 1939 17 Anm. 20 [502,9-502,22], Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Duckworth 1980 130 [502,4-502,22], Emmel 1980 49 [501,17-502,22], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22]
Fiktionalität: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26]
Forschungsbericht: Mergell 1953a 434 Anm. 7 [502,4-502,22]
Fuetrer, Ulrich: Nyholm 1964 195 [502,4-502,30]
Gattung: Haferland 1988 203 [502,4-502,22], 329 Anm. 197 [502,4-502,22]
Gesamtwürdigung: Sacker 1963 153 [502,13-502,22], Kratz, H. 1973a 306 [502,4-502,22], Bumke 1997a 108 [501,22-502,22], Reichert, H. 2002 192-93 [502,7-502,22]
Geschichte: Heer 1952 361 [502,4-502,22]
Gottfried von Straßburg: Bayer, Hans 1978 36 [502,15-502,22]
Gral: San-Marte 1861 126 [502,7-502,22], 242 [502,7-502,22], Golther 1925a 178 [502,4-502,22], Burdach 1938 521 [502,17-502,19], Weber, G. 1948 36 Anm. 2 [502,12-502,22], 67 [501,1-502,30], 71 [502,15-502,19], 124 [501,1-502,30], 131 [502,10-502,22], Mergell 1952a 94-95 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22], Mergell 1952b 112-13 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22], Mockenhaupt 1968 255-56 [502,15-502,19], Burdach 1974 521 [502,17-502,19], Bayer, Hans 1983 361-62 [502,15-502,22]
Hartmann von Aue: Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22]
heterodoxe Einflüsse: Katann 1957/58 324 [501,1-502,30], 325 [502,1-502,30], Zeydel 1953b 30 [502,4-502,28], Bayer, Hans 1978 36 [502,15-502,22], Wareman, P 1981 107 [502,17-502,19], Katann 1957/58 324 [501,1-502,30], 325 [502,1-502,30]
höfischer Roman: Haferland 1988 203 [502,4-502,22], 329 Anm. 197 [502,4-502,22]
höfisches Leben: Wessels, P. 1952 15 Anm. 34 [502,10-502,22], Mersmann 1971 268 [502,17-502,19], 285 [502,17-502,18], 288 [502,17-502,18], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Reuvekamp-Felber 2003 306 [502,9-502,22]
Hofkleriker: Reuvekamp-Felber 2003 306 [502,9-502,22]
Humanismus: Weber, R. 1918 386 [502,4-502,22], 388 [502,4-502,22]
Interpretation: Weber, G. 1948 36 Anm. 2 [502,12-502,22], 67 [501,1-502,30], 71 [502,15-502,19], 124 [501,1-502,30], 131 [502,10-502,22], Heer 1952 361 [502,4-502,22], Mersmann 1971 268 [502,17-502,19], 285 [502,17-502,18], 288 [502,17-502,18], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Weber, G. 1981 851 Anm. 182 [502,12-502,19], Wynn 1984 296 [502,4-502,22], Haferland 1988 203 [502,4-502,22], 329 Anm. 197 [502,4-502,22], Haug 1990 210 [502,4-502,22], Liebertz-Grün 1993a 106 [502,13-502,22], Haug 1997f 134 [502,4-502,22], Faust 1903/04 286 [501,19-502,30]
Jüngerer Titurel: San-Marte 1863 426 [502,7-502,22], San-Marte 1872d 181 [502,7-502,22], Parshall 1981 255 Anm. 50 [502,7-502,22]
Kommentar: Joos und Whitesell 1951 142, Nellmann 1994c 703, [502,9-502,22], Gilmour 2000 167 [502,7-502,22]
Kyot: Wolfart und San-Marte 1861 139 [502,17-502,19], Mergell 1952b 112-13 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22], Zeydel 1953b 30 [502,4-502,28]
Legende: Wessels, P. 1955 114 [502,10-502,22], Wessels, P. 1966 235 [502,10-502,22]
Literaturgeschichte: Bertau 1972/73 976 [501,11-502,30], Ehrismann, G. 1927 258 [502,4-502,22], Bertau 1972/73 976 [501,11-502,30]
Longinuslegende: Burdach 1938 521 [502,17-502,19], Burdach 1974 521 [502,17-502,19]
Minne u. Ehe: Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952b 75-76 [502,7-502,22], 172 [502,7-502,22], Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22], Kleber, J. 1992b 316 [502,15-502,19], Sauer, P. 2002 460 [502,15-502,19]
Nacherzählung: Weber, G. 1981 851 Anm. 182 [502,12-502,19]
Pädagogik: Sauer, P. 2002 460 [502,15-502,19]
Politik: Heer 1952 361 [502,4-502,22]
Prolog: Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22]
Quellen - allgemein: Golther 1925a 178 [502,4-502,22], Burdach 1938 521 [502,17-502,19], Fourquet 1938b 189 Anm. 1 [500,23-502,30], Mergell 1952a 94-95 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22], Mergell 1952b 112-13 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22], Wessels, P. 1955 114 [502,10-502,22], Wessels, P. 1966 235 [502,10-502,22], Burdach 1974 521 [502,17-502,19]
Quellen - Chrétien: Rachbauer 1934 252 [502,4-502,22], Fourquet 1938b 189 Anm. 1 [500,23-502,30], Rachbauer 1970 252 [502,4-502,22], Rachbauer 1980 252 [502,4-502,22]
Rache: Möbius 1993 271 [502,18-502,19]
Realismus: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26]
Reichtum u. materialer Besitz: Mersmann 1971 268 [502,17-502,19], 285 [502,17-502,18], 288 [502,17-502,18]
Religion: San-Marte 1861 126 [502,7-502,22], 242 [502,7-502,22], San-Marte 1863 426 [502,7-502,22], San-Marte 1872d 181 [502,7-502,22], Sattler 1895 84 [502,15-502,19], 85 [502,17-502,19], Ehrismann, G. 1908 445-46 [499,11-502,30], Weber, R. 1918 386 [502,4-502,22], 388 [502,4-502,22], Weber, G. 1935 42 [502,18-502,19], 43 [502,15-502,19], Mockenhaupt 1942 255-56 [502,15-502,19], Weber, G. 1948 36 Anm. 2 [502,12-502,22], 67 [501,1-502,30], 71 [502,15-502,19], 124 [501,1-502,30], 131 [502,10-502,22], Mergell 1952a 94-95 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22], Mergell 1952b 112-13 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952b 75-76 [502,7-502,22], 172 [502,7-502,22], Wessels, P. 1952 15 Anm. 34 [502,10-502,22], Bayerschmidt 1954 217 [502,9-502,22], Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Wessels, P. 1955 114 [502,10-502,22], Koppitz 1959 128 [502,17-502,19], 317 [502,13-502,19], Wessels, P. 1966 235 [502,10-502,22], Mockenhaupt 1968 255-56 [502,15-502,19], Duckworth 1980 130 [502,4-502,22], Wareman, P 1981 107 [502,17-502,19], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22], Bayer, Hans 1983 361-62 [502,15-502,22], Murdoch 1999a 156 [502,12-502,19], Sauer, P. 2002 460 [502,15-502,19]
Rezeption (allgemein): Golther 1925a 178 [502,4-502,22]
Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 195 [502,4-502,30], Parshall 1981 255 Anm. 50 [502,7-502,22]
Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Kreis 1995 94 [502,4-502,22], Wagemann 1998 76 [502,9-502,22]
Ritterethik: Ehrismann, G. 1908 445-46 [499,11-502,30], Keferstein 1937a 87 Anm. 5 et seq. [502,4-502,22], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952b 75-76 [502,7-502,22], 172 [502,7-502,22], Mockenhaupt 1968 255-56 [502,15-502,19]
Rittertum: Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952b 75-76 [502,7-502,22], 172 [502,7-502,22], Wessels, P. 1952 15 Anm. 34 [502,10-502,22]
Schuld: Kellermann, W. 1936 115 [502,4-502,22], Keferstein 1937a 87 Anm. 5 et seq. [502,4-502,22], Mockenhaupt 1968 255-56 [502,15-502,19], Wareman, P 1981 107 [502,17-502,19]
Sexuelles u. Geschlechterbeziehungen: Bayer, Hans 1983 361-62 [502,15-502,22]
Sprache: Wiktorowicz 1999 41 [502,17-502,19]
Stil: Riemer, G. 1906 100, Mergell 1943 238 [502,4-502,22], Kutzner 1975 118-19 [502,15-502,19]
Sünde: Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Mockenhaupt 1968 255-56 [502,15-502,19], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22]
Teilausgabe: Joos und Whitesell 1951 142
triuwe: Emmel 1936 49 [501,17-502,22], Emmel 1980 49 [501,17-502,22]
Überlieferung: Eis 1951/52a 194 [502,15-503,10], Eis 1979c 203 [502,15-503,10], Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 101 [501,21-502,19], 126 [502,4-503,8], 141 [502,15-503,10], Eis 1951/52a 194 [502,15-503,10]
Übersetzung: San-Marte 1858b XCVII [502,9-502,23], Zeydel und Morgan 1951 362, Nellmann 1994c 703, [502,9-502,22]
Wagner, Richard: Kreis 1995 94 [502,4-502,22]
Wahrnehmung, Blick usw: Bumke 2001a 89 Anm. 195 [502,4-502,22]
Werkstruktur: Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Horacek 1972 226 [500,1-502,28], Hirschberg 1976 252 Anm. 28 [501,19-502,30], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22], Faust 1903/04 286 [501,19-502,30]
Wissenschaftsgeschichte: Joos und Whitesell 1951 142
Wortschatz: Riemer, G. 1906 100, Mersmann 1971 268 [502,17-502,19], 285 [502,17-502,18], 288 [502,17-502,18]
Wortsinn: Weber, G. 1981 851 Anm. 182 [502,12-502,19]
Zahlenkomposition: Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22]
zwîvel: Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952b 75-76 [502,7-502,22], 172 [502,7-502,22], Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Duckworth 1980 130 [502,4-502,22], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22]
 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben)