502,11 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 502,10]
Adaptation: Hilka 1932 742 [502,4-502,22], Kellermann, W. 1936 115 [502,4-502,22], Fourquet 1938b 189 Anm. 1 [500,23-502,30], Mergell 1943 238 [502,4-502,22], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1975a 114 [502,7-502,22], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1978j 333 [502,7-502,22] Bildungsroman: Sauer, P. 2000 250 [502,9-502,14] Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 300 [502,7-502,12] Didaktik u. Lehrdichtung: Boesch 1977 185 [502,4-502,22] Erzähltechnik: Hirschberg 1976 252 Anm. 28 [501,19-502,30], Parshall 1981 274 Anm. 104 [502,4-502,12], Neuendorff 1987a 289 [502,4-502,22], 290 [501,19-502,30] ethischer Wortschatz: Heckel, H. 1939 17 Anm. 20 [502,9-502,22], 79 Geschichte: Snelleman 1941 130 [502,7-502,12] Gral: San-Marte 1861 242 [502,7-502,22], Burdach 1938 521, Mergell 1952a 94-95 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22], Mergell 1952b 112-13 Anm. 1 [502,7-502,22], Mergell 1953a 434 Anm. 7 [502,4-502,22], Burdach 1974 521, Bumke 1997a 108 [501,22-502,22] Grammatik: Zimmermann, Gisela 1974 294 [502,10-502,11] heterodoxe Einflüsse: Katann 1957/58 324 [501,1-502,30], 325 [502,1-502,30], Zeydel 1953b 30 [502,4-502,28] Hofkleriker: Reuvekamp-Felber 2003 306 [502,9-502,22] Interpretation: Faust 1903/04 286 [501,19-502,30], Bertau 1972/73 976 [501,11-502,30], Weber, G. 1948 67 [501,1-502,30], 71 [502,11-502,12], 124 [501,1-502,30], 131 [502,10-502,22], Heer 1952 361 [502,4-502,22], Richter, J. 1953 13 [502,4-502,12], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Kratz, H. 1973a 306 [502,4-502,22], Wynn 1984 296 [502,4-502,22], Haferland 1988 203 [502,4-502,22], 329 Anm. 197 [502,4-502,22], Haug 1990 210 [502,4-502,22], Lampe 1990 188-89 [502,4-502,14], Haug 1997f 134 [502,4-502,22], Gilmour 2000 167 [502,7-502,22], Bumke 2001a 89 Anm. 195 [502,4-502,22], Reichert, H. 2002 192-93 [502,7-502,22] Minne u. Ehe: Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952b 172 [502,7-502,22], Öhlinger 2001 161 [502,9-502,12] Quellen - Chrétien: Golther 1925a 178 [502,4-502,22], Rachbauer 1934 252 [502,4-502,22], Rachbauer 1970 252 [502,4-502,22], Rachbauer 1980 252 [502,4-502,22] Religion: San-Marte 1858b XCVII [502,9-502,23], San-Marte 1861 126 [502,7-502,22], San-Marte 1863 426 [502,7-502,22], San-Marte 1872d 181 [502,7-502,22], Sattler 1895 84 [502,7-502,12], Weber, R. 1918 386 [502,4-502,22], 388 [502,4-502,22], Ehrismann, G. 1927 258 [502,4-502,22], Mockenhaupt 1942 255 [502,11-502,12], Schröder, Walter Johannes 1952b 75-76 [502,7-502,22], Wessels, P. 1952 15 Anm. 34 [502,10-502,22], Bayerschmidt 1954 217 [502,9-502,22], Wapnewski 1955 178 [502,4-502,22], Wessels, P. 1955 114 [502,10-502,22], Wessels, P. 1966 235 [502,10-502,22], Mockenhaupt 1968 255 [502,11-502,12], Duckworth 1980 130 [502,4-502,22], Wapnewski 1982 178 [502,4-502,22], Nellmann 1994c 703 [502,9-502,22] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 195 [502,4-502,30], Parshall 1981 255 Anm. 50 [502,7-502,22] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Wagemann 1998 76 [502,9-502,22] Ritterethik: Ehrismann, G. 1908 445-46 [499,11-502,30], Keferstein 1937a 87 Anm. 5 et seq. [502,4-502,22] Rittertum: Knapp, F. 1970 8 Anm. 20 [502,7-502,12] Sprache: Kraus, C. 1898a 168, Kraus, C. 1985 168 triuwe: Emmel 1936 49 [501,17-502,22], Emmel 1980 49 [501,17-502,22] Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 101 [501,21-502,19], 126 [502,4-503,8] Wagner, Richard: Kreis 1995 94 [502,4-502,22] Werkstruktur: Horacek 1972 226 [500,1-502,28] Wortschatz: Schmidt, C. 1898a 33, Riemer, G. 1906 76 Wortsinn: Joos und Whitesell 1951 142
	[Zu 502,12]