503,30 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)[Zu 503,29]
Adaptation: Mergell 1943 274 [503,21-503,30], Mergell 1953a 451 Anm. 34 [503,21-503,30]
Ausgabenmethodik: Neumann, F. 1966b 36 [503,1-503,30]
Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 426-27 [503,21-503,30]
Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Grimm, Walther Ludwig 1897 17 Anm. 42 [503,1-503,30], Schreiber, A. 1922 148-49 [503,1-503,30], 151 [503,1-503,30], 195 [503,1-503,30], Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 3 [503,1-503,30], 144 [503,1-503,30], Boigs 1984 16 [503,21-503,30], Boigs 1987 372 [503,5-503,30], Nellmann 1994c 704 [503,1-503,30]
Erzähltechnik: Nellmann 1973a 96 Anm. 85 [503,5-503,30], Hirschberg 1976 199 [503,1-504,6], 242 [503,1-504,6], 243 [503,1-504,6], 357 [503,1-504,6], Groos 1981a 61 Anm. 38 [503,27-503,30], Groos 1995 38 [503,27-503,30], Eikelmann 1996 246 [503,1-504,6], Schu 2002 294 [503,27-503,30]
französischer Wortschatz: Suolahti 1933 310
Gawan: Dimpel 2001 42 Anm. 12 [503,21-504,6]
Gawan-Handlung: Sacker 1963 128 [503,21-503,30]
Gottfried von Straßburg: Haruta 1978 242 [503,27-503,30]
Gral: Burdach 1938 522 [503,21-503,30], Burdach 1974 522 [503,21-503,30], Groos 1995 38 [503,27-503,30]
Grammatik: Boysen 1910 115, Gilmour 2000 233
Heinrich von Veldeke: Kern, Manfred 1998 274 [503,1-504,6]
Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 289 Anm. 27 [503,27-503,30]
heterodoxe Einflüsse: Kahane, H. und Kahane, R. 1965 67-68 [503,21-503,30]
Interpretation: Mohr 1958b 5 [503,5-503,30], Mohr 1966a 293 [503,5-503,30], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Kratz, H. 1973a 313 [503,5-503,30], 335 [503,5-504,30], Wieners 1973 106 [503,27-503,30], Mohr 1979e 68 [503,5-503,30], Ruh 1980 109 [503,21-503,30], 117 [503,21-503,30], Huber, H. 1981 144 [503,27-503,30], Schirok 1987a 64 [503,27-503,30], Schirok 1988a 136 [503,5-503,30], Czerwinski 1989 174 [503,27-503,30], Kordt 1997 73 [503,27-504,6], Gilmour 2000 291 [503,27-503,30], 309 [503,1-503,30], 324 [503,5-504,6]
Ironie: Green 1979a 137 [503,21-503,30]
Minne u. Ehe: Kleber, J. 1992b 334 [503,1-503,30], 338 [503,1-503,30]
Quellen - allgemein: Heinzel 1893 9 [503,1-503,30], 66 [503,5-504,6], 97 [503,21-504,6], 103 [503,1-504,30], Hagen, P. 1900 86 [503,27-503,30], Golther 1925a 183 [503,5-503,30], Weber, G. 1928 29 [503,5-503,30]
Raum u. Bewegung: Wynn 1961b 404 [503,21-503,30], 408 [503,21-503,30], Wynn 1984 103 [503,21-503,30], 109 [503,21-503,30]
Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 XCVI <, 196 [503,1-503,30], Jillings 1980 130 [503,21-503,30], Kern, Peter 1981 187 Anm. 97 [503,7-507,24], Schirok 1982 124 <, Mentzel-Reuters 1989 189 [503,5-503,30]
Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Winkler 1988 567 [503,21-503,30]
Rittertum: Groos 1995 38 [503,27-503,30]
Stil: Kolb 1975a 213 Anm. 52 [503,27-503,30]
Traummotivik: Fischer, S. 1978 127 [503,27-503,30]
Werkstruktur: Hirschberg 1976 198 [503,1-504,6], Sauer, M. 1981 260 Anm. 6 [503,5-504,5]
Wortsinn: Zimmermann, Gisela 1974 75
Zeitverhältnisse: Weigand, H. 1938 946 [503,1-503,30], Weigand, H. 1967b 34 [503,1-503,30], Weigand, H. 1969b 66 [503,1-503,30], Nellmann 1994c 703 [503,5-504,6], 740 [503,5-504,8]
 [Zu 504, 1]