583,18 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben)
Adaptation: Mergell 1943 288 [583,1-585,28], Pastré 1978 76 [583,1-584,4], Neugart 1996 79 Anm. 46 [583,1-587,14], Emmerling 2003 82 Anm. 35 [583,8-584,4], 123 [583,8-584,1], 185 [583,8-584,4] Alexanderlegende: Medert 1989 254 Anm. 19 [583,8-584,4] Artusepik: Schultz, J. 1983 231 Anm. 40 [583,1-587,14], Schirok 1988b 15 [583,8-584,1], Thomas, N. 1989 62 [583,1-584,4], Roßnagel 1996 178 [583,17-583,19], Stein, Peter 2000 123 Anm. 331 [583,12-583,19], Wolf, J. 2003a 206 Anm. 2 [583,12-584,1] Ausgabe: Nellmann 1994c 724 [583,1-587,14] âventiure: Ohly 1970 469 [583,1-584,4], Ohly 1977b 147 [583,1-584,4] Blutstropfenepisode: Dewald 1975 182 Anm. 41 [583,1-587,14] Charakterisierung: Emmerling 2003 82 Anm. 35 [583,8-584,4], 123 [583,8-584,1], 185 [583,8-584,4], Schröder, J. 2004 288 [583,1-584,4] Clinschor: Krohn 2001 517 [583,8-583,24] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Boigs 1987 357 [583,1-584,4], 373 [583,1-584,4], 378 [583,1-584,4], Boigs 1992 9 [583,4-584,4], 10, 15 [583,4-584,4] Erzähler: Nellmann 1973a 100 Anm. 98 [583,1-584,4], Karg, I. 1993b 42 [583,1-584,29] Erzähltechnik: Mergell 1943 288 [583,1-585,28], Nellmann 1973a 100 Anm. 98 [583,1-584,4], Dewald 1975 182 Anm. 41 [583,1-587,14], Hirschberg 1976 232-33 [583,1-584,11], Neugart 1996 79 Anm. 46 [583,1-587,14], Schu 2002 192 Anm. 195 [583,8-584,4] Fiktionalität: Huth 1972 118 [583,8-584,1], 404 [185,21-815,26] Frauenfiguren: Emmerling 2003 82 Anm. 35 [583,8-584,4], 123 [583,8-584,1], 185 [583,8-584,4] Fuetrer, Ulrich: Voß, R. 1990 212 [583,1-584,4] Gattung: Stein, Peter 2000 123 Anm. 331 [583,12-583,19], Schu 2002 192 Anm. 195 [583,8-584,4] Gawan: Dimpel 2001 52 [583,1-583,24] Gawan-Handlung: Zimmermann, Gisela 1972 142 [583,1-585,28], Boigs 1987 357 [583,1-584,4], 373 [583,1-584,4], 378 [583,1-584,4], Thomas, N. 1989 62 [583,1-584,4], Karg, I. 1993b 42 [583,1-584,29], Neugart 1996 79 Anm. 46 [583,1-587,14], Dimpel 2001 52 [583,1-583,24], Emmerling 2003 82 Anm. 35 [583,8-584,4], 123 [583,8-584,1], 185 [583,8-584,4], Wynn 1976/77 134 [583,1-585,4] Gesamtwürdigung: Kratz, H. 1973a 34 [583,12-583,19], 345 [583,1-584,21] Gral: Dewald 1975 182 Anm. 41 [583,1-587,14], Karg, I. 1993b 42 [583,1-584,29] Hartmann von Aue: Wiegand 1972 186 [583,8-584,1], Wand 1989 47 [583,1-583,19], Krohn 2001 517 [583,8-583,24] Heidentum: San-Marte 1862b 10 [583,1-584,30] Heinrich von dem Türlin: Stein, Peter 2000 123 Anm. 331 [583,12-583,19] Heinrich von Veldeke: Poag 1965a 69 [583,1-584,11] Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 288 [583,1-584,4] höfischer Roman: Schu 2002 192 Anm. 195 [583,8-584,4] höfisches Leben: Huth 1972 118 [583,8-584,1], 404 [185,21-815,26], Brall 1986 573 Anm. 55 [583,4-584,1] Interpretation: Johnson, L. 1967 70 [583,8-584,4], Huth 1972 118 [583,8-584,1], 404 [185,21-815,26], Zimmermann, Gisela 1972 142 [583,1-585,28], Dewald 1975 182 Anm. 41 [583,1-587,14], Brall 1983b 296 [583,1-584,4], Schultz, J. 1983 231 Anm. 40 [583,1-587,14], Brall 1986 573 Anm. 55 [583,4-584,1], Schirok 1988b 15 [583,8-584,1], Thomas, N. 1989 62 [583,1-584,4], Karg, I. 1993b 42 [583,1-584,29], Roßnagel 1996 178 [583,17-583,19], Dimpel 2001 52 [583,1-583,24], Krohn 2001 517 [583,8-583,24] Intertextualität: Knapp, F. 1988b 103-04 [583,4-583,19], Schirok 1988b 15 [583,8-584,1], Wand 1989 47 [583,1-583,19], Draesner 1993 175 [583,1-584,4], 344 Anm. 98 [583,1-584,4], 349 [583,1-584,1], 352 [583,1-584,1], 357 [583,8-584,4], 358 [583,12-583,19], 359 s. auch Anm. 126 & 127 [583,1-584,4], 364 [583,1-584,4], 367 [583,1-584,4], 421 [583,12-584,1], Green 1995a 162 [583,8-584,4], Wand-Wittkowski 1996 460 [583,8-584,4] Ither: Walshe 1937/39c 283 [583,12-583,19], [583,12-583,19] Jüngerer Titurel: Krohn 2001 517 [583,8-583,24] Kommentar: Spiewok 1977 604 [583,12-583,19], Spiewok 1986c 617 [583,12-583,19], Nellmann 1994c 724 [583,1-587,14], Gilmour 2000 118 Literaturgeschichte: Johnson, L. 1999 272 [583,12-583,19] Männerfiguren: Emmerling 2003 82 Anm. 35 [583,8-584,4], 123 [583,8-584,1], 185 [583,8-584,4] Märchen: Neugart 1996 79 Anm. 46 [583,1-587,14] Metaphorik u. Bildlichkeit: Ohly 1970 469 [583,1-584,4], Ohly 1977b 147 [583,1-584,4] Minne u. Ehe: San-Marte 1862b 10 [583,1-584,30], Poag 1965a 69 [583,1-584,11], Ohly 1970 469 [583,1-584,4], Huth 1972 118 [583,8-584,1], 404 [185,21-815,26], Wiegand 1972 186 [583,8-584,1], Zimmermann, Gisela 1972 142 [583,1-585,28], Dewald 1975 182 Anm. 41 [583,1-587,14], Ohly 1977b 147 [583,1-584,4], Schnell, Rüdiger 1985a 221 [583,1-587,14], 239 [583,1-587,14], Karg, I. 1993b 42 [583,1-584,29], Dimpel 2001 52 [583,1-583,24], Emmerling 2003 82 Anm. 35 [583,8-584,4], 123 [583,8-584,1], 185 [583,8-584,4] Namen: Kolb 1982 268 [583,12-583,19], Walshe 1937/39c 283 [583,12-583,19] Orgeluse: Wynn 1976/77 134 [583,1-585,4], Zimmermann, Gisela 1972 142 [583,1-585,28], Dieterich 2000 60 [583,1-584,4], Dimpel 2001 52 [583,1-583,24], Wynn 1976/77 134 [583,1-585,4] Der Pleier: Kern, Peter 1981 72 Anm. 15 [583,12-583,19] Quellen - allgemein: Heinzel 1893 7 [583,8-583,19], [583,1-585,28], Walshe 1937/39c 283 [583,12-583,19] Quellen - Chrétien: Wynn 1976/77 134 [583,1-585,4] Realismus: Huth 1972 118 [583,8-584,1], 404 [185,21-815,26] Reim: Kraus, C. 1898a 142, Kraus, C. 1985 142 Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Kern, Peter 1981 72 Anm. 15 [583,12-583,19], Schirok 1982 25 [583,1-584,4], Thomas, N. 1987 59 [583,1-584,4], Schirok 1988b 15 [583,8-584,1], Medert 1989 254 Anm. 19 [583,8-584,4], Thomas, N. 1989 62 [583,1-584,4], Voß, R. 1990 212 [583,1-584,4], Roßnagel 1996 178 [583,17-583,19], Stein, Peter 2000 123 Anm. 331 [583,12-583,19], Krohn 2001 517 [583,8-583,24] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Krohn 2001 517 [583,8-583,24] Rhetorik: Nellmann 1973a 100 Anm. 98 [583,1-584,4] Ritterethik: San-Marte 1862b 10 [583,1-584,30], Emmerling 2003 82 Anm. 35 [583,8-584,4], 123 [583,8-584,1], 185 [583,8-584,4] Ritterkampf u. Turnierwesen: San-Marte 1862b 10 [583,1-584,30], Schröder, J. 2004 288 [583,1-584,4] Rittertum: San-Marte 1862b 10 [583,1-584,30], Dimpel 2001 52 [583,1-583,24] Schicksal u. Fortuna: Dieterich 2000 60 [583,1-584,4] Selbstverteidigung: Boigs 1992 9 [583,4-584,4], 10, 15 [583,4-584,4] Soziologie: Brall 1983b 296 [583,1-584,4] Sprache: San-Marte 1862b 10 [583,1-584,30], Kraus, C. 1898a 142, Johnson, L. 1967 70 [583,8-584,4], Dewald 1975 182 Anm. 41 [583,1-587,14], Kraus, C. 1985 142 Stil: Mergell 1943 288 [583,1-585,28], Kutzner 1975 206 [583,1-585,4], Pastré 1978 76 [583,1-584,4], Knapp, F. 1988b 103-04 [583,4-583,19] Subjektivität: Dewald 1975 182 Anm. 41 [583,1-587,14] Übersetzung: Spiewok 1977 604 [583,12-583,19], Spiewok 1986c 617 [583,12-583,19], Nellmann 1994c 724 [583,1-587,14] Ulrich von Etzenbach: Medert 1989 254 Anm. 19 [583,8-584,4] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Brall 1986 573 Anm. 55 [583,4-584,1] elterngeschichte)/Vorgeschichte (Gahmuret/Elterngeschichte): Karg, I. 1993b 42 [583,1-584,29] Wagner, Richard: Krohn 2001 517 [583,8-583,24] Werkstruktur: Hirschberg 1976 232-33 [583,1-584,11], Schultz, J. 1983 231 Anm. 40 [583,1-587,14] Wirnt von Grafenberg: Thomas, N. 1987 59 [583,1-584,4] Wortschatz: San-Marte 1862b 10 [583,1-584,30]
	(zu den versspezifischen Angaben)