646,22 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)[Zu 646,21]
Adaptation: Wilmotte 1933b 46 Anm. 1 [644,19-647,30], Mergell 1943 305 [646,14-646,22]
Erzähltechnik: Walker, E. 1928 233 [646,6-646,22], 239 [646,6-646,22], 240 [646,6-646,22], 275 Anm. 83 [646,6-646,22], Urscheler 2002 120 [645,21-647,23]
Geographie: Wynn 1961a 43 [646,6-646,22], Wynn 1984 158 [646,6-646,22]
Ginover: Gibbs 1972 232 [646,21-646,22]
Interpretation: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Kratz, H. 1973a 313 [646,6-646,22], 364 [644,12-647,26], Ruh 1980 118 [645,21-646,22], Pratelidis 1994 87 [646,6-646,22], 190 [646,1-646,23], Gilmour 1997 312 [645,3-646,22]
Metaphorik u. Bildlichkeit: Bock, L. 1879 21
Metrik: Kraus, C. 1902 212 [646,9-646,22]
Minne u. Ehe: Weigand, H. 1969f 177 Anm. 11 [646,1-646,22], Kleber, J. 1992b 353 [646,6-646,22], Karg, I. 1993b 141 [645,1-646,22]
Moriaen: Paardekooper-van Buuren 1969 350 [646,21-646,23], Wells, D. 1971a 249 [645,2-646,23]
Quellen - Chrétien: Wilmotte 1932b 454 Anm. 1 [644,19-647,30]
Rittertum: Neudeck 1994b 60 [644,20-647,23]
Syntax: Horacek 1952c 291-92 [646,21-646,22], 298 [646,21-646,22], Horacek 1964 98 [646,21-646,22], 140 [646,21-646,22]
triuwe: Emmel 1936 56 [646,21-646,22], Emmel 1980 56 [646,21-646,22]
Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Delabar 1990 287 [646,1-646,22]
vreude: Korn 1932 121
Wortschatz: Riemer, G. 1906 51, Mersmann 1971 37 [644,12-647,30], Wolf, B. 2002 86 Anm. 526
Wortsinn: Mergell 1943 357, Hoffmann, Werner 1963b 990, Weber, G. 1981 990, Gilmour 2000 157
Zeitverhältnisse: Bumke 1991d 152 [646,14-646,22]
 [Zu 646,23]