656,26 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)[Zu 656,25]
Adaptation: Wilmotte 1933b 34 Anm. 1 [656,1-658,6], Mergell 1943 306 [655,28-657,9]
Charakterisierung: Ringeler 2000 168 Anm. 196 [656,25-656,26]
Clinschor: San-Marte 1862b 3 [656,1-657,2], 5 [656,1-659,30], Blank 1989a 321 [656,26-656,27], Tuchel 1994 246 [656,6-657,9], Hartmann, Heiko 2000 99 [656,25-658,8]
Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Schreiber, A. 1922 125 Anm. 20 [656,25-657,12]
Erzähltechnik: Sauer, M. 1981 188 Anm. 1 [656,6-657,9], Schu 2002 339 Anm. 48 [656,3-659,16]
Etymologie: Nellmann 1994c 741 [656,26-656,27]
Gawan-Handlung: Jones, M. 1999 52 [656,25-657,25]
Geschichte: Snelleman 1941 80 Anm. 4 [656,12-657,25], Nellmann 1994c 741 [656,26-656,27]
Gral: Mergell 1951b 85 Anm. 1 [656,25-657,2], Mergell 1952b 85-86 Anm. 1 [656,25-657,2], Matthews, J. 1990 95 [656,25-657,26]
Hartmann von Aue: Wand 1989 65 [656,22-657,9]
Heidentum: Abou-El-Ela 2001 39 Anm. 134 [656,25-656,26]
Humor: Coxon 2002 129-30 [656,25-657,25]
Interpretation: Wynn 1962 155 [656,3-657,7], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Zimmermann, Gisela 1972 147 [656,18-657,9], Kratz, H. 1973a 355 [656,25-657,25], Schult 1975 122 [656,3-658,30], Ruh 1980 110 [656,12-659,16], Wynn 1984 175 [656,3-657,7], Lampe 1987c 220 [655,11-657,9], 353-54 [656,18-657,2], Nellmann 1994c 492 [655,28-658,30], 741 [656,26-656,27], 742 [656,26-656,27], 745 [656,25-657,25], Kästner und Schirok 2000a 100 [656,1-659,16], Wynn 2002b 183 [656,3-657,7]
Intertextualität: Draesner 1993 374 [656,25-657,9]
Kyot: Ernst 1985 188 [656,1-659,10]
Minne u. Ehe: San-Marte 1862b 149 [656,25-657,11], Schumacher, Marlis 1967 39 Anm. 34 [656,18-657,27], Wiegand 1972 119 Anm. 159 [656,25-657,25], Kleber, J. 1992b 348 [656,1-658,30], Karg, I. 1993b 40 [656,25-657,9]
Namen: Singer, S. 1898a 430-32 [656,26-656,27], Fourquet 1949 257, Passage 1964 253 [656,14-657,15], Fourquet 1966a 977 [656,26-656,27], Fourquet 1979l 202, Fourquet 1979m 208 [656,26-656,27], Mohr 1979q 475, Schröder, Werner 1982b 46, Passage 1984 151 [656,1-657,30], 199 [656,25-656,27], Singer, S. 1985 430-32 [656,26-656,27], Chandler 1992 105 [656,25-656,26], de Mandach 1992 112 [656,12-657,2], Müller, M. 2003 204 [656,6-658,30]
Orgeluse: Dieterich 2000 44 Anm. 158 [656,6-659,10], Dimpel 2001 45 [656,25-657,9]
Pädagogik: Karg, I. 1998 283 [656,1-659,14]
Proben: Kasper, C. 1995 187 Anm. 151 [656,26-656,27], 385 [656,25-657,9]
Quellen - allgemein: Heinzel 1893 21 [656,14-657,9], Golther 1925a 188 [655,3-658,8], Nellmann 1994c 741 [656,26-656,27]
Quellen - Chrétien: Wilmotte 1932b 442 Anm. 1 [656,1-659,16]
Religion: Mockenhaupt 1942 172 [656,25-657,2], Mockenhaupt 1968 172 [656,25-657,2]
Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Singer, S. 1898a 430-32 [656,26-656,27], Nyholm 1964 265 [656,19-658,30], Jillings 1980 205 [656,6-658,30], Bleumer 1997b 215 [656,6-657,9], Daiber 1999 203 Anm. 291 [656,6-659,16], Stein, Peter 2000 93 Anm. 233 [656,14-658,30]
Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Wagemann 1998 177 [656,6-659,16]
Selbstverteidigung: Boigs 1992 11 [656,3-660,2]
Soziologie: Lawn 1977 278 [656,25-658,6]
Sprache: Tao 1997 105 [656,25-657,2]
triuwe: Halbach 1954 607 [655,4-658,6], Halbach 1960 571 [655,4-658,6]
Ulrich von Zatzikhoven: Singer, S. 1898a 430-32 [656,26-656,27], Singer, S. 1985 430-32 [656,26-656,27]
Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Sutter 2003 119 Anm. 420, 119-20 [656,14-657,9], 253
Wagner, Richard: Wapnewski 1978a 243 [655,11-657,9]
Wahrnehmung, Blick usw: Coxon 2004b 163 [656,25-657,25]
Zauberei: Haage 1986c 69 Anm. 112 [656,1-656,30], Haage 1986d 72 Anm. 55 [656,1-656,30], McFarland 1993 284 [655,28-659,16], 285 [656,25-657,25], [655,28-659,16], Pastré 1994i 159 [656,24-657,25]
 [Zu 656,27]