66,16 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 66,15]
Abbildungen: Stephan-Chlustin 2004 80 [65,25-68,2] Adaptation: Mergell 1943 329 [65,29-68,2] Artus: Gürttler 1976 120 [66,16-66,17] Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 61 [66,15-66,22], Johnson, L. 1978a 286 [66,15-66,22], Ringeler 2000 147 Anm. 115 [66,9-66,22] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Grimm, Walther Ludwig 1897 44 [65,29-66,21], Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 59 [65,29-67,28], 60 Anm. 1 [65,29-67,10], Boigs 1987 371 [65,29-66,28] Erzähltechnik: Johnson, S. 1958 288 [66,16-66,17], Harroff 1974 21 [65,25-67,10], Green 1978c 142 [65,25-68,16], Green 1982b 73 Anm. 49 [66,9-66,17], 103 Anm. 54 [65,29-67,29], 145 Anm. 49 [66,15-66,17], Stein, A. 1993 16 Anm. 6 [66,15-66,22], Neugart 1996 130 Anm. 6 [65,29-66,17], Green 2002e 173 Anm. 54 [65,29-67,29], Schu 2002 93 [65,29-67,10], 94 Anm. 177 [65,24-67,6], Brüggen 2004 175 [65,25-68,16] Fiktionalität: Green 2002b 237 Anm. 92 [65,25-68,2] Gawan: San-Marte 1862b 23 [66,15-66,21], Emmel 1951 108 [66,16-66,22], Garnerus 1999 59 [66,15-66,16], Tomasek 2000 481 [66,15-66,22], Shockey 2002 333 [66,15-66,22], Emmerling 2003 71 [66,9-66,17] Gawan-Handlung: Sacker 1963 71 [66,15-66,22], Jones, M. 1999 40 [65,29-66,22] Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 112 [65,18-68,16], 153 Anm. 106 [66,15-66,22] Humor: Kant 1878 50 Anm. 2 [66,15-66,22] Interpretation: Bertau 1972/73 874 [65,25-68,16], Henschel 1952a 302 [66,15-66,22], Mohr 1958b 3 [66,15-66,22], Wynn 1962 155 [66,15-66,22], Mohr 1966a 290 [66,15-66,22], Roßkopf 1972 67 [65,29-67,28], 77 Anm. 1 [65,29-66,22], Kratz, H. 1973a 182 [63,27-68,18], Ortmann 1973 682 Anm. 19 [65,25-68,2], Mohr 1979e 65 [66,15-66,22], Mohr 1979j 193 [65,29-67,10], Brall 1983b 200 [66,15-66,22], Wynn 1984 176 [66,15-66,22], Haferland 1988 107 [66,15-66,22], Nellmann 1994c 644 [66,15-66,22], Pratelidis 1994 209 [66,15-66,22], Garnerus 1999 184 Anm. 335 [66,15-66,22], Hartmann, Heiko 2000 101, 181 [65,25-68,2], Bumke 2001a 162 [66,1-66,22], Wynn 2002b 184 [66,15-66,22], Bumke 2004 190 [66,15-66,22] Intertextualität: Draesner 1993 179 [66,15-66,22], 182 Anm. 12 [65,25-67,29], 419 [65,29-67,28] Kindheit u. Jugend: Sparnaay 1922 40 [66,9-66,22], Schultz, J. 1995b 66 Anm. 143 [66,15-66,22] Männer (allgemein): Mertens, V. 2003a 385 [66,15-66,22] Medizin: Haferlach 1991 56 Anm. 6 [66,15-66,22] Minne u. Ehe: Schumacher, Marlis 1967 148 Anm. 74 [66,15-66,22], Kleber, J. 1992b 165 [65,29-67,1], 271 [66,15-66,22], Fritsch-Rößler 1999 250 [66,15-66,22] Namen: Rosumek 1989 193 [65,23-66,22], Müller, M. 2003 204 [62,25-68,1], 341 Anm. 760 [65,25-68,2] Pädagogik: Essen 1967 69 [66,15-66,21] Quellen - allgemein: Lichtenstein 1897 73 [65,29-67,28], Palgen 1922a 41 [65,29-66,22], 42 [66,15-66,17], Wilmotte 1930 37 Anm. 4 [66,1-66,17], Kratz, H. 1973a 155 [66,11-66,22] Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 13 [17,15-127,18] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Cormeau 1977a 141 [66,15-66,22], Ebenbauer 1979a 394 [66,15-66,22], 399 [66,15-66,22], Kern, Peter 1981 96 Anm. 16 [66,15-66,22], Huschenbett 1998b 382 [66,15-66,22] Ritterkampf u. Turnierwesen: Niedner 1881 82 [65,28-67,28] Rittertum: Groos 1995 83 [66,15-66,22] Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 120 [66,2-70,7] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Delabar 1990 113-14 [66,15-66,22], Jones, W. 1990 33 [66,9-66,17], Rohland de Langbehn 1991 195 [66,1-66,30], Sutter 2003 99 [66,9-66,17], 174 [66,15-66,21] Vorgeschichte (Gahmuret/Elterngeschichte): Leckie 1989 29 [65,29-67,28] Wahrnehmung, Blick usw: Schirok 2002b 115 Anm. 56 [66,15-66,22] Werkstruktur: Schultz, J. 1983 214 Anm. 27 [66,1-66,22] Wortschatz: Riemer, G. 1906 43 Wortsinn: Gilmour 2000 139, Hartmann, Heiko 2000 101 Zeitverhältnisse: Hartmann, Heiko 2000 101, 413 [66,15-66,22], Kartschoke, D. 2000 489 [66,15-66,22]
	[Zu 66,17]