Artus: Gürttler 1976 138-39 [667,14-667,26]
Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Boigs 1987 372 Anm. 48 [665,25-668,22]
Erzähltechnik: Johnson, S. 1958 291 [667,9-667,26], Urscheler 2002 50 [667,14-667,27]
Gawan: Emmerling 2003 127 [667,22-667,24]
Gawan-Handlung: Poag 1977 73 [667,9-667,26], Jones, M. 1999 66 [666,23-667,26]
Grammatik: Ehrismann, G. 1903/04 145 [667,15-667,26], Boysen 1910 156 [667,12-667,29]
heterodoxe Einflüsse: Bayer, Hans 1978 79 Anm. 18 [667,22-667,24]
Interpretation: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Kratz, H. 1973a 366 [666,2-668,22], Czerwinski 1989 144 [667,19-667,24], Pratelidis 1994 79 [667,22-667,26], Brüggen 1996 212 [667,22-667,24], 215 [667,9-667,26]
Minne u. Ehe: Kleber, J. 1992b 353 [667,22-667,24]
Redewendungen, Formelhaftes usw: Matz 1907 61 Anm. 2
Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 265 [667,1-670,20]
Stil: Kinzel 1874 13, Kutzner 1975 139 [666,8-668,10]
triuwe: Emmel 1936 56 [667,7-667,26], Emmel 1980 56 [667,7-667,26]
Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 100 [667,21-668,11]
Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Delabar 1990 288 Anm. 48 [667,9-667,26]
Wirtschaft u. Handel: Otto 1993 297 Anm. 947 [667,12-667,26]
Zeitverhältnisse: Rührmund 1848 473 [667,1-668,30]
|