Artus: Gürttler 1976 138-39 [667,14-667,26]
Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Boigs 1987 372 Anm. 48 [665,25-668,22]
Erzähltechnik: Johnson, S. 1958 291 [667,9-667,26], Green 1982b 170 [667,25-667,26], Urscheler 2002 50 [667,14-667,27]
Gawan-Handlung: Poag 1977 73 [667,9-667,26], Jones, M. 1999 66 [666,23-667,26]
Grammatik: Ehrismann, G. 1903/04 145 [667,15-667,26], Boysen 1910 156 [667,12-667,29]
heterodoxe Einflüsse: Bayer, Hans 1982 172 Anm. 50 [667,25-667,27]
Interpretation: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Kratz, H. 1973a 366 [666,2-668,22], Haferland 1988 109 [667,25-667,26], Pratelidis 1994 79 [667,22-667,26], Brüggen 1996 215 [667,9-667,26]
Kommunikation: Schnyder, M. 2003 204 [667,25-667,26]
Religion: Bayer, Hans 1983 422 Anm. 66 [667,25-667,27]
Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 265 [667,1-670,20]
Stil: Kutzner 1975 139 [666,8-668,10]
Syntax: Grosse 1985a 1155
triuwe: Emmel 1936 56 [667,7-667,26], Emmel 1980 56 [667,7-667,26]
Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 100 [667,21-668,11]
Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Delabar 1990 288 Anm. 48 [667,9-667,26]
Wirtschaft u. Handel: Otto 1993 297 Anm. 947 [667,12-667,26]
Zeitverhältnisse: Rührmund 1848 473 [667,1-668,30]
|