672, 9 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben)
Adaptation: Bernhardt 1901 373 [671,8-672,24], Wilmotte 1932b 455 [672,8-672,10], Fourquet 1938b 143 [672,8-672,14], Mergell 1943 306 [672,1-672,14], Fourquet 1966b 112 [672,8-672,14] Anfortas: Neudeck 1994b 60 Anm. 32 [672,7-672,14] Ausgabe: Nellmann 1994c 746 [672,8-672,9] Blutstropfenepisode: Schirok 2002b 116 Anm. 58 [672,8-672,9] Clinschor: Blank 1989a 321 Anm. 4 [672,4-672,14] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Boigs 1987 374 [672,8-672,14], [670,1-672,20], Sutter 2003 54 Anm. 212, 56 [672,1-672,10], 100 [672,5-672,14], 246, 266 Erzähler: Bradley, R. 1981 248 [672,8-672,14] Erzähltechnik: Mergell 1943 306 [672,1-672,14], Johnson, S. 1958 291 [670,23-672,21], Bradley, R. 1981 248 [672,8-672,14], Green 1982b 171 Anm. 135, 171 [672,5-672,14], Urscheler 2002 96 [672,2-672,14] ethischer Wortschatz: Mohr 1958b 22 [672,5-672,14], Mohr 1966a 317 [672,5-672,14], Mohr 1979e 92 [672,5-672,14] Fiktionalität: Huth 1972 63 [672,8-672,14], 404 [185,21-815,26] Frauen (allgemein): Kellermann-Haaf 1986 66 [672,5-672,14], Miklautsch 1991a 24 [672,8-672,21] Fuetrer, Ulrich: Nyholm 1964 266 [670,21-672,21] Gattung: Haferland 1988 107 [672,8-672,14] Gawan-Handlung: Heller 1925 496 [672,7-672,10], Johnson, S. 1958 291 [670,23-672,21], Boigs 1987 374 [672,8-672,14], [670,1-672,20], Jones, M. 1999 66 [672,8-672,14] Gesamtwürdigung: Kratz, H. 1973a 367-68 [672,5-672,14], Bumke 2004 158 [672,7-672,14] Gewalt: Neudeck 1994b 60 Anm. 32 [672,7-672,14] Grammatik: Bernhardt 1901 373 [671,8-672,24], Ehrismann, G. 1903/04 147 [672,8-672,12] Herrschaft: Neudeck 1994b 60 Anm. 32 [672,7-672,14] höfischer Roman: Ehrismann, G. 1903/04 147 [672,8-672,12], Haferland 1988 107 [672,8-672,14], Ehrismann, G. 1903/04 147 [672,8-672,12] höfisches Leben: Huth 1972 63 [672,8-672,14], 404 [185,21-815,26] Interpretation: Mohr 1958b 22 [672,5-672,14], Mohr 1966a 317 [672,5-672,14], Huth 1972 63 [672,8-672,14], 404 [185,21-815,26], Mohr 1979e 92 [672,5-672,14], Bradley, R. 1981 248 [672,8-672,14], Green 1982b 171 Anm. 135, 171 [672,5-672,14], Haferland 1988 107 [672,8-672,14], Blank 1989a 321 Anm. 4 [672,4-672,14], Czerwinski 1989 143 [672,1-672,12], Pratelidis 1994 135 [672,1-672,21] Kommentar: Nellmann 1994c 746 [672,8-672,9] Kommunikation: Urscheler 2002 96 [672,2-672,14] Literaturgeschichte: Bertau 1972/73 1009 [672,8-672,14], [672,8-672,14] Männerfiguren: Blank 1989a 321 Anm. 4 [672,4-672,14] Minne u. Ehe: Huth 1972 63 [672,8-672,14], 404 [185,21-815,26], Kleber, J. 1992b 343 [672,8-672,14] Der Pleier: Kern, Peter 1981 73 Anm. 19 [672,1-672,14], 90 Anm. 12 [672,8-672,13] Politik: Kellermann-Haaf 1986 66 [672,5-672,14] Quellen - allgemein: Heinzel 1893 98 [672,8-672,21], Fourquet 1938b 143 [672,8-672,14], Fourquet 1966b 112 [672,8-672,14] Quellen - Chrétien: Heller 1925 496 [672,7-672,10], Wilmotte 1932b 455 [672,8-672,10], Fourquet 1938b 143 [672,8-672,14], Fourquet 1966b 112 [672,8-672,14], Sutter 2003 54 Anm. 212, 56 [672,1-672,10], 100 [672,5-672,14], 246, 266 Realismus: Huth 1972 63 [672,8-672,14], 404 [185,21-815,26] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 266 [670,21-672,21], Kern, Peter 1981 73 Anm. 19 [672,1-672,14], 90 Anm. 12 [672,8-672,13] Rittertum: Neudeck 1994b 60 Anm. 32 [672,7-672,14] Soziologie: Pratelidis 1994 135 [672,1-672,21] Stil: Mergell 1943 306 [672,1-672,14] Überlieferung: Nellmann 1966 335 Übersetzung: Nellmann 1994c 746 [672,8-672,9] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Mohr 1958b 22 [672,5-672,14], Mohr 1966a 317 [672,5-672,14], Mohr 1979e 92 [672,5-672,14], Miklautsch 1991a 24 [672,8-672,21], Sutter 2003 54 Anm. 212, 56 [672,1-672,10], 100 [672,5-672,14], 246, 266 Wahrnehmung, Blick usw: Schirok 2002b 116 Anm. 58 [672,8-672,9] Zauberei: Blank 1989a 321 Anm. 4 [672,4-672,14] Zeitverhältnisse: Sutter 2003 54 Anm. 212, 56 [672,1-672,10], 100 [672,5-672,14], 246, 266
	(zu den versspezifischen Angaben)