672, 8 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)[Zu 672, 7]
Adaptation: Mergell 1943 306 [672,1-672,14]
Clinschor: Blank 1989a 321 Anm. 4 [672,4-672,14]
Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Boigs 1987 374 [672,8-672,14], [670,1-672,20]
Erzähltechnik: Johnson, S. 1958 291 [670,23-672,21], Green 1982b 171 [672,5-672,14], Urscheler 2002 96 [672,2-672,14]
Frauen (allgemein): Kellermann-Haaf 1986 66 [672,5-672,14], Miklautsch 1991a 24 [672,8-672,21]
Gawan-Handlung: Jones, M. 1999 66 [672,8-672,14]
Grammatik: Ehrismann, G. 1903/04 147 [672,8-672,12], Bernhardt 1901 373 [671,8-672,24]
Individualität: Bumke 2004 158 [672,7-672,14]
Interpretation: Bertau 1972/73 1009 [672,8-672,14], Huth 1972 63 [672,8-672,14], 404 [185,21-815,26], Kratz, H. 1973a 367-68 [672,5-672,14], Bradley, R. 1981 248 [672,8-672,14], Haferland 1988 107 [672,8-672,14], Czerwinski 1989 143 [672,1-672,12], Nellmann 1994c 746 [672,8-672,9], Pratelidis 1994 135 [672,1-672,21]
Minne u. Ehe: Kleber, J. 1992b 343 [672,8-672,14]
Quellen - allgemein: Heinzel 1893 98 [672,8-672,21], Fourquet 1938b 143 [672,8-672,14], Fourquet 1966b 112 [672,8-672,14]
Quellen - Chrétien: Heller 1925 496 [672,7-672,10], Wilmotte 1932b 455 [672,8-672,10]
Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 266 [670,21-672,21], Kern, Peter 1981 73 Anm. 19 [672,1-672,14], 90 Anm. 12 [672,8-672,13]
Rittertum: Neudeck 1994b 60 Anm. 32 [672,7-672,14]
Überlieferung: Nellmann 1966 335
Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Mohr 1958b 22 [672,5-672,14], Mohr 1966a 317 [672,5-672,14], Mohr 1979e 92 [672,5-672,14], Sutter 2003 56 [672,1-672,10], 100 [672,5-672,14]
Wahrnehmung, Blick usw: Schirok 2002b 116 Anm. 58 [672,8-672,9]
 [Zu 672, 9]