783,14 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)[Zu 783,13]
Charakterisierung: Rupp, H. 1962 11 Anm. 8 [783,11-783,14], 12 [783,6-783,15], Ortmann 1972 85 Anm. 36 [783,4-783,26], 103 [783,1-783,26], 120 [783,4-783,26], 121 [783,11-783,15], 130 [783,4-783,26], 134 Anm. 60 [783,4-783,26]
Erzähltechnik: Urscheler 2002 119 [783,4-783,26]
ethischer Wortschatz: Martin, A. 1984 88 [783,13-783,14]
Frauen (allgemein): Blumstein 1977 101 [783,1-783,26]
Frauenfiguren: Breyer 1996 67 [783,13-783,14]
das Fremde: Classen 1998r 145 [783,4-783,26]
Grammatik: Boysen 1910 133
heterodoxe Einflüsse: Katann 1957/58 326 [783,1-784,30]
Interpretation: Weber, G. 1948 77 [783,11-783,18], Johnson, L. 1967 84 [783,11-783,14], Johnson, L. 1968a 66 [783,11-783,14], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Kratz, H. 1973a 400 [783,1-783,17], 571 [782,29-783,26], Dewald 1975 289 [783,13-783,15], [783,4-783,26], Brall 1983b 304 [783,13-783,17], Huby, Michel 1989 268 [783,6-783,15], Lampe 1990 265 [783,13-783,14], Groos 1991 410 [783,13-783,17], Pappas 2001 170 [783,13-783,15]
Kommunikation: Lasch und Liebig 2002 73 [781,1-783,30]
Metaphorik u. Bildlichkeit: Hüning 2000 129 [783,13-783,17]
Naturwissenschaft: Groos 1995 192 [783,13-783,17]
Religion: Mockenhaupt 1942 246 [783,11-783,17], Mockenhaupt 1968 246 [783,11-783,17], Duckworth 1980 274 [783,13-783,17], Haferland 1994b 276 Anm. 33 [782,22-783,26]
Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Gürttler 1976 378 Anm. 126
Ritterethik: Ehrismann, G. 1908 450 [783,1-783,17], Keferstein 1937a 99 Anm. 1 [783,4-783,14], Voß, R. 1998 34 [783,4-783,26]
Sprache: Wiktorowicz 1999 70 [783,13-783,14]
Stil: Weber, G. 1928 268 [782,23-783,30], Kutzner 1975 188 [783,4-783,14]
Wortsinn: Backes, S. 1999 70
 [Zu 783,15]