797,26 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 797,25]
Abbildungen: Stephan-Chlustin 2004 175 [797,16-799,12] Adaptation: Mergell 1943 200-01 [797,23-797,30], 339 [797,23-797,30], 342 [797,23-797,30] Bildungsroman: Sauer, P. 2000 156 [797,1-798,30] Charakterisierung: Rupp, H. 1962 12 [797,23-797,30], Ortmann 1972 130 [797,23-797,30], 137 [797,23-797,30] Condwiramurs: Braunagel 2001 57 [797,16-799,13] Erzähltechnik: Walker, E. 1928 272 Anm. 56 [797,23-797,30], Harroff 1974 131 Anm. 9 [797,1-799,30], Groos 1981a 56 [797,23-797,30], 57 [797,24-797,27], Schu 2002 298 Anm. 208 [797,23-797,30], 393 [797,23-797,27], 418 [797,16-798,30] Gral: Mergell 1951b 63 [797,19-798,30], 76-77 Anm. 1 [797,24-797,27], Mergell 1952a 123 [797,23-798,30], 125 [797,23-797,30], Mergell 1952b 63 [797,19-798,30], 76-77 Anm. 1 [797,24-797,27], 141 [797,23-798,30], 143 [797,23-797,30], Schäfer, H. 1983 125 Anm. 144 [797,26-797,27], Schäfer, H. 1985 147 Anm. 144 [797,26-797,27] güete: Meissburger 1968 169 Anm. 72 [797,23-797,30] heterodoxe Einflüsse: Kahane, H. und Kahane, R. 1965 9 [797,25-797,27] Interpretation: Weber, G. 1948 77 [797,23-797,30], 78 [797,23-797,27], 159 [797,23-797,30], Wesle, C. 1950 35 [797,23-797,30], Alker 1953 10 [797,19-797,30], Springer 1959 242 [797,16-799,13], Gehrts 1960 292 [797,23-797,30], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Kratz, H. 1973a 403 [796,17-797,30], Tax 1973a 7 [797,23-797,30], Wieners 1973 96 [797,17-797,30], 196 Anm. 445 [797,23-797,27], Springer 1975b 205 [797,16-799,13], Schirok 1987a 50 Anm. 15 [797,23-797,30], 52 [797,23-797,30], Groos 1995 233 [797,23-797,30], 234 [797,23-797,30], 234-235 [797,24-797,27], 235 [797,23-797,30], Pol 2000 59 [797,16-798,5], Schirok 2002a 92 Anm. 84 [797,23-797,30] Medizin: Haferlach 1991 185 Anm. 3 [797,23-797,30], Haage 1992d 277 Anm. 384 [797,16-798,30] Minne u. Ehe: Kleber, J. 1992b 318 [797,19-798,30] Pädagogik: Essen 1967 73 [797,4-798,30] Religion: San-Marte 1861 45 [797,26-797,27], 254 zitiert als 797,21 [797,23-797,27], 257 [797,19-798,2], Sattler 1895 5 [797,25-797,27], Mockenhaupt 1942 60 [797,23-797,30], 187 [797,23-797,27], Wapnewski 1955 67 Anm. 146 [797,23-797,30], 169 [797,18-797,30], 170 [797,23-797,27], 190 [797,23-797,30], Koppitz 1959 268-69 [797,23-797,30], Mockenhaupt 1968 60 [797,23-797,30], 187 [797,23-797,27], Duckworth 1980 269-70 [797,23-797,27], Wapnewski 1982 67 Anm. 146 [797,23-797,30], 169 [797,18-797,30], 170 [797,23-797,27], 190 [797,23-797,30], Haferland 1994b 293 [797,23-798,5], Huntley-Speare 1999 125 Anm. 56 [797,23-797,30], Müller, M. 2003 138 [797,23-798,5] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Carnevale 1997 71 [797,23-798,30] Ritterethik: Ehrismann, G. 1927 256 [797,16-798,30], Voß, R. 1998 34 [797,23-798,30] Stil: Weber, G. 1928 268 [797,19-799,12], Johnson, L. 1978d 312 [797,19-799,13] Sünde: Maurer 1951b 157 [797,23-798,5] tumpheit: Haas, A. 1964 167 [797,23-797,30], 289 [797,23-797,30] Überlieferung: Rosenfeld, Hans-Friedrich 1929 180 [797,5-798,4], Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 135 [797,5-799,4] Zeitverhältnisse: Rührmund 1848 473 [796,28-799,16], 475 [797,13-799,15]
	[Zu 797,27]