94, 5 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)[Zu 94, 4]
Ampflise: Kinzel 1889 56 [94,5-94,10], Gibbs 1980 48
Belakane: Gibbs 1972 91 [94,5-94,6], Ebenbauer 1984a 23 [94,5-94,6], Classen 1998o 283 [94,5-94,10], Parra Membrives 2001 21 Anm. 22 [94,5-94,10], Parra Membrives 2002 54 Anm. 24 [94,5-94,10]
Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 44 [94,5-94,10]
Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Wolff, L. 1924 182 [93,11-96,10], Cucuel 1937 12, Wolff, L. 1967e 186 [93,11-96,10]
Erzähltechnik: Stein, A. 1993 50, Schu 2002 97 [94,5-94,10], 97 Anm. 188 [94,4-96,6], Urscheler 2002 57 [94,5-95,26], 247 [94,5-94,10], 248
Frauen (allgemein): Kellermann-Haaf 1986 56 [94,5-94,10], Sterling-Hellenbrand 1993 59 [94,1-96,10], Rinn 1996 165 [94,5-94,6]
Gahmuret: Richey 1923b 26 Anm. 20 [94,5-94,6], Cucuel 1937 63 [94,5-94,10]
Geographie: Sterling-Hellenbrand 2001 144 Anm. 40 [94,5-94,6]
Heidentum: Swinburne 1956 197 [94,5-94,6]
Herzeloyde: Kinzel 1889 59 [94,4-94,10], Heise 1957 42 [94,1-96,6], Niermann 1998 22 [94,1-95,19], 27 [93,26-95,19], 44 [94,1-95,26], Emmerling 2003 233 [94,5-94,6]
Interpretation: Misch 1927 262 Anm. 2 [94,1-94,30], Johnson, S. 1970a 106 [94,5-94,6], Huth 1972 67 [94,1-95,26], 68 [94,1-95,26], Roßkopf 1972 69 [94,5-94,6], 86, Kratz, H. 1973a 186 [94,5-94,10], Ortmann 1973 678 [94,5-94,16], 689 [93,11-96,11], 690 [94,5-94,6], Tax 1973b 30 [94,1-95,26], Brall 1983b 121 [94,3-94,10], Wynn 1984 321 [94,5-94,6], 324 [94,5-94,6], Lampe 1987b 122 [94,5-94,6], Haferland 1988 321 Anm. 107 [94,5-94,6], Steppich 1993 402 Anm. 33 [94,5-94,16], Pratelidis 1994 125 [94,5-94,20], Johnson, L. 1999 350 [94,2-96,10], Hartmann, Heiko 2000 87 [94,5-94,6], 162 [94,5-94,6], 209 [94,3-95,26], 218 [94,3-96,6], 240-41 [94,4-96,6], 241
Juristisches: Fehr 1931 132 [94,5-94,6], Nellmann 1994c 504 [94,3-96,6], Hartmann, Heiko 2000 240-41 [94,4-96,6], 249 [94,4-96,6]
Minne u. Ehe: Bauß 1938 12 [94,5-94,10], Furstner 1956 117 [94,5-94,10], Schumacher, Marlis 1967 26 [94,5-95,4], Wiegand 1972 265 [94,5-94,6], Faber 1973 203, Christoph 1981a 51 [94,5-94,10], Masser 1990 131 s. auch Anm. 95 [94,5-94,6], Ertzdorff 1991a 344 [94,5-94,10], Kleber, J. 1992b 182 [94,5-94,10], Ertzdorff 1996d 173 [94,5-94,10], Fritsch-Rößler 1999 191 [94,5-94,6], Öhlinger 2001 43 [94,5-94,6]
Parzival: Pörksen, G. und Pörksen, U. 1980 266 Anm. 22 [94,1-94,16]
Psychologie: Obleser 1997 35 [94,5-94,8]
Quellen - allgemein: Palgen 1922a 50 [94,5-94,10], Wilmotte 1932a 395 [94,1-94,30]
Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 13 [17,15-127,18], Wilmotte 1933b 24 [94,1-94,30]
Redewendungen, Formelhaftes usw: Schwarz, W. 1965 70 [94,5-94,6], Schwarz, W. 1984b 24 [94,5-94,6]
Religion: San-Marte 1861 136 [94,5-94,6]
Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Schirok 1982 104 [94,5-94,6], Unger, R. 1990 175 [94,1-96,10]
Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Niermann 2004 143 [93,29-95,29]
Verskunst: Stutz 1989 465
Vorgeschichte (Gahmuret/Elterngeschichte): Pretzel 1971 392 [94,5-94,10], Pretzel 1979e 246 [94,5-94,10], Leckie 1989 29 [94,5-94,6], Russ 2000 31 [94,5-94,6], 81 [94,5-94,6]
 [Zu 94, 6]