94, 9 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 94, 8]
Ampflise: Kinzel 1889 56 [94,5-94,10] Belakane: Ebenbauer 1984a 23 [94,7-94,9], Classen 1998o 283 [94,5-94,10], Parra Membrives 2001 21 Anm. 22 [94,5-94,10], Parra Membrives 2002 54 Anm. 24 [94,5-94,10] Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 44 [94,5-94,10] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Wolff, L. 1924 182 [93,11-96,10], Wolff, L. 1967e 186 [93,11-96,10] Erzähltechnik: Schu 2002 97 [94,5-94,10], 97 Anm. 188 [94,4-96,6], Urscheler 2002 57 [94,5-95,26], 247 [94,5-94,10] Frauen (allgemein): Kellermann-Haaf 1986 56 [94,5-94,10], Sterling-Hellenbrand 1993 59 [94,1-96,10], Rinn 1996 165 [94,7-94,10] Gahmuret: Cucuel 1937 63 [94,5-94,10] Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 119 [94,8-94,10] Herzeloyde: Kinzel 1889 59 [94,4-94,10], Heise 1957 42 [94,1-96,6], Niermann 1998 22 [94,1-95,19], 27 [93,26-95,19], 44 [94,1-95,26] indoeur. Mythologie: Pastré 1993c 53 [94,7-94,10] Interpretation: Misch 1927 262 Anm. 2 [94,1-94,30], Huth 1972 67 [94,1-95,26], 68 [94,1-95,26], Roßkopf 1972 72 Anm. 2 [94,6-94,10], Kratz, H. 1973a 186 [94,5-94,10], Ortmann 1973 678 [94,5-94,16], 689 [93,11-96,11], 690 [94,7-94,10], Tax 1973b 30 [94,1-95,26], Brall 1983b 121 [94,3-94,10], Steppich 1993 402 Anm. 33 [94,5-94,16], Nellmann 1994c 505 [94,8-94,10], Pratelidis 1994 125 [94,5-94,20], Johnson, L. 1999 350 [94,2-96,10], Hartmann, Heiko 2000 209 [94,3-95,26], 218 [94,3-96,6], 240-41 [94,4-96,6], 246 [94,7-94,10] Juristisches: Nellmann 1994c 504 [94,3-96,6], Hartmann, Heiko 2000 240-41 [94,4-96,6], 241, 249 [94,4-96,6] Minne u. Ehe: Bauß 1938 12 [94,5-94,10], Furstner 1956 117 [94,5-94,10], Schumacher, Marlis 1967 26 [94,5-95,4], Wiegand 1972 266 [94,7-94,10], Christoph 1981a 51 [94,5-94,10], Ertzdorff 1991a 344 [94,5-94,10], Kleber, J. 1992b 182 [94,5-94,10], Ertzdorff 1996d 173 [94,5-94,10], Fritsch-Rößler 1999 206 [94,7-94,10] Parzival: Pörksen, G. und Pörksen, U. 1980 266 Anm. 22 [94,1-94,16] Quellen - allgemein: Palgen 1922a 50 [94,5-94,10], Wilmotte 1932a 395 [94,1-94,30] Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 13 [17,15-127,18], Wilmotte 1933b 24 [94,1-94,30] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Unger, R. 1990 175 [94,1-96,10] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Niermann 2004 143 [93,29-95,29] Sprache: Kraus, C. 1898a 166, Kraus, C. 1985 166 Syntax: Mourek 1911 26 [94,7-94,10], Horacek 1964 240 [94,7-94,10] Vorgeschichte (Gahmuret/Elterngeschichte): Pretzel 1971 392 [94,5-94,10], 393 [94,8-94,10], Pretzel 1979e 246 [94,5-94,10], 247 [94,8-94,10] Wortsinn: Pretzel 1982 168
	[Zu 94,10]