133,17 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 133,16]
Adaptation: Hilka 1932 634 [133,16-133,20], Wilmotte 1933b 41 Anm. 1 [133,16-133,18], Snelleman 1941 46 [133,16-133,18], Mergell 1943 26 [133,17-133,18], 42 [133,17-133,18], 69 [133,16-133,18], Huby, Michel 1975a 48 [133,16-133,18], Pastré 1979 368 [133,17-133,18] Charakterisierung: Johnson, L. 1978a 278 [133,17-133,18], 279 [133,17-133,18], Johnson, L. 1978c 294 [133,16-133,18] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 155 [107,10-170,13] Erzähltechnik: Parshall 1981 49-50 [133,5-133,28], Green 1982b 120 Anm. 101 [133,11-133,20], 121 [133,17-133,18], Green 1983a 62-63 [133,17-133,18], Schu 2002 224 [133,16-133,20], 331 [133,17-133,22], Urscheler 2002 93 [133,3-137,19], 251 [133,16-133,20] Grammatik: Bernhardt 1901 374 [133,6-133,28], Boysen 1910 79, Yeandle 1984 12 [133,11-133,20], 353 Hartmann von Aue: Schirok 2004b 26 Anm. 16 [133,17-133,18] Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 229 [133,16-133,18] höfisches Leben: Gephart 1994 130 zitiert als 123,15-22. [133,15-133,22] Humor: Ridder 2002a 141 Anm. 20 [133,16-133,18] Interpretation: Okken 1968 637 [133,15-133,22], Hahn, I. 1975 219 [133,16-133,18], Huber, H. 1981 163 [133,16-133,20], Yeandle 1984 215 [133,16-133,20], 245 [133,10-133,20], Lampe 1987b 160 [133,16-133,18], Czerwinski 1989 92 [133,16-133,18], 118 [133,17-133,28], Soeffner 1990 58 Anm. 30 [133,16-133,22], Nellmann 1994c 596 [133,17-133,18], Backes, S. 1999 66 [133,16-133,18], 95 [133,17-133,18], 110 [133,5-135,24], Gilmour 2000 59 [133,16-133,28] Ironie: Green 1979a 168 Anm. 1 [133,17-133,18] Lichtmetaphorik: Cessari 2000 91 [133,16-133,20] Minne u. Ehe: Bauß 1938 69 [133,6-135,24], Weigand, H. 1956a 34 [133,6-134,5], Weigand, H. 1969f 172 [133,5-135,24], Christoph 1981a 72 [133,16-133,20], Emmerling 2003 269 [133,17-133,18] Quellen - allgemein: Weber, G. 1928 40 [133,16-133,18] Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 15 [133,15-133,18], Wilmotte 1932b 449 Anm. 1 [133,16-133,18], Rachbauer 1934 73 [133,11-133,18], Bauß 1938 69 [133,6-135,24], Rachbauer 1970 73 [133,11-133,18], Rachbauer 1980 73 [133,11-133,18] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 133 [130,26-133,28], Ebenbauer 1979a 383 [133,16-133,20] Ritterethik: Emmerling 2003 276 Anm. 20 [133,17-133,18] Schönheit: Ehrismann, O. 1995 190 [133,15-133,18] Soziologie: Sowinski 1993 121 [133,17-133,18] Stil: Lichtenstein 1897 85 [133,17-133,18], Pastré 1978 76 [133,17-133,18] Syntax: Mourek 1911 6 [133,17-133,18], Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 106 Anm. 2 tumpheit: Haas, A. 1964 72 [133,16-133,18] Überlieferung: Kühnel 1972 176 Wappenkunde: Gut 2000 260 Anm. 457 [133,16-133,20] Werkstruktur: Fourquet 1965 141 [133,5-133,28], Fourquet 1979j 166 [133,5-133,28] Wortschatz: Ehrismann, O. 1995 190 [133,15-133,18]
	[Zu 133,18]