Adaptation: Gilmour 2000 43-45 [163,17-166,16]
Ausgabenmethodik: Stackmann 1964 258 Anm. 58, Stackmann 1997b 16 Anm. 58
Bibelmotivik: Gilmour 2000 43-45 [163,17-166,16]
Charakterisierung: Johnson, L. 1978c 294 [164,12-165,4], Gilmour 2000 26 [163,17-166,16], 136-37 [163,17-166,16]
Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Wolff, L. 1924 182 [164,5-167,4], Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 155 [107,10-170,13], Wolff, L. 1967e 186 [164,5-167,4]
ethischer Wortschatz: Gilmour 2000 74
Hartmann von Aue: Schnell, Rüdiger 1973 309 [164,27-165,2]
Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 180 [164,25-165,2]
Interpretation: Joos und Whitesell 1951 99, 136, Schröder, Walter Johannes 1963 22 [164,29-165,2], Mersmann 1971 128 [164,11-165,4], Kratz, H. 1973a 230 [164,11-165,2], Huber, H. 1981 85 [164,12-165,2], Czerwinski 1989 118 [164,29-165,2], Gilmour 2000 43-45 [163,17-166,16], 61 [164,11-165,4], 74 [164,29-165,2], 267 [164,29-165,4]
Interpunktion: Gilmour 2000 74 [164,29-165,2]
Minne u. Ehe: Naumann, H. 1929a 30 [164,29-165,1], Christoph 1981a 203 [164,29-165,2], Greenfield 1985a 28 [164,29-165,4]
Parataxe: Karg-Gasterstädt 1925 101 Anm. 2
Psychologie: Knapp, B. 1984 52 [164,29-165,2]
Quellen - allgemein: Weber, G. 1928 28 [164,24-165,14]
Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 22 [164,24-165,14], 23 [164,24-165,14], Rachbauer 1934 54 [164,11-165,14], Rachbauer 1970 54 [164,11-165,14], Rachbauer 1980 54 [164,11-165,14]
Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 139 [164,11-166,20], Margetts 1987 36 Anm. 8 [163,16-166,30]
schame: Gilmour 2000 43-45 [163,17-166,16]
Schönheit: Heckel, H. 1939 93 [164,2-165,30], Gilmour 2000 92 Anm. 76 [164,29-164,30]
Sprache: Gilmour 2000 74
Stil: Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18]
Syntax: Mourek 1911 13 [164,29-165,1], 14 Anm. 5 [164,29-164,30], Gilmour 2000 74 [164,29-165,2]
tumpheit: Haas, A. 1964 84 [164,29-165,2]
Werkstruktur: Hirschberg 1976 62 [164,9-165,4]
Wortsinn: Gilmour 2000 74
zuht: Gilmour 2000 33 [163,17-166,16]
|