250,30 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben) | |
Adaptation: Weber, G. 1928 55 Anm. 68 [250,25-250,30], 150 [250,26-250,30], Rachbauer 1934 156 [250,24-250,30], Stockum 1941 17 [250,26-250,30], Mergell 1943 5 [250,26-250,30], 132 Anm. 30 [250,26-250,30], 149-50 [250,22-250,30], 158 [250,29-250,30], 197 [250,26-250,30], Henzen 1951 208 [250,29-250,30], Henzen 1966 146 [250,29-250,30], Rachbauer 1970 156 [250,24-250,30], Rachbauer 1980 156 [250,24-250,30], Buschinger 1995h 72 [249,23-252,15]
Alexanderlegende: Mergell 1951b 42 Anm. 1 [250,29-250,30], Mergell 1952b 42 Anm. 1 [250,29-250,30] Anfortas: Blamires 1966 313 [250,29-250,30] Architektur: Wiesinger 1976a 256 [250,26-250,30] Artusepik: Trachsler, E. 1979 163 [250,24-250,30] Ausgabe: Nellmann 1994c 590 [250,26-250,30], 678 [250,26-250,30] Ausgabenmethodik: Huby, Michel 1980b 421 [250,29-250,30] Bernhard von Clairvaux: Mergell 1952b 42 Anm. 1 [250,29-250,30] Bibliographie: Wesseling 1998a 1544 [250,26-250,30] Bildungsroman: Gerhard 1926 30 Anm. 3 [250,26-250,30], Misch 1927 248 [250,29-250,30], Gerhard 1968 30 Anm. 3 [250,26-250,30] Blutstropfenepisode: Dewald 1975 87 Anm. 59 [250,25-251,24], 231 [250,26-250,30], 250 [250,26-250,30], 274 [250,24-252,1] Buch IX: Henzen 1951 208 [250,29-250,30], Henzen 1966 146 [250,29-250,30] Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 313 [250,29-250,30], Johnson, L. 1978b 292 [250,12-251,1], Huber, H. 1981 295 Anm. 374 [250,26-250,30], Schröder, J. 2004 227 Anm. 332 [250,26-250,30], 255 [250,26-250,30] Condwiramurs: Blamires 1966 313 [250,29-250,30] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Poag 1972a 60 [250,26-250,30], Schäfer, H. 1983 72 [250,29-251,7], 79 [250,17-251,4], Schäfer, H. 1985 76 [250,29-251,7], 83 [250,17-251,4], Lampe 1990 175 [250,29-251,18], Sutter 2003 181-82 [250,29-251,20] Erzähler: Nellmann 1973a 90 [250,22-251,24], Green 1979a 148 [250,22-251,20] Erzähltechnik: Mergell 1943 5 [250,26-250,30], 132 Anm. 30 [250,26-250,30], 149-50 [250,22-250,30], 158 [250,29-250,30], 197 [250,26-250,30], Nellmann 1973a 90 [250,22-251,24], Dewald 1975 87 Anm. 59 [250,25-251,24], 231 [250,26-250,30], 250 [250,26-250,30], 274 [250,24-252,1], Hirschberg 1976 88 Anm. 11 [250,26-250,30], 132 [250,26-250,30], Green 1979a 148 [250,22-251,20], Sauer, M. 1981 259 Anm. 1 [250,24-250,30], Green 1982b 118 Anm. 97 [250,26-250,30], 203 Anm. 95 [250,25-251,24], 210 Anm. 122 [249,11-252,8], 211 [250,26-250,30], Steppich 1993 395 [250,26-250,30], Schu 2002 290 [250,26-250,30], 388 [250,26-250,30], Urscheler 2002 164 [250,17-251,20], 165 [250,17-251,20] ethischer Wortschatz: San-Marte 1861 244 [250,22-250,30], Wapnewski 1955 163 [250,26-250,30], Wapnewski 1982 163 [250,26-250,30] Exotisches: Lecouteux 1981a 285 [250,26-250,30] Feirefiz: Caples 1975/76 546 [250,26-250,30], Blamires 1966 313 [250,29-250,30], Caples 1975/76 546 [250,26-250,30] Fiktionalität: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Forschungsbericht: Stockum 1941 17 [250,26-250,30] Frauenfiguren: Heise 1957 45 [249,11-253,9], 48 [250,3-251,24], Niermann 1998 108 [250,17-251,1], Sterling-Hellenbrand 2001 114 [250,26-250,30], [250,17-251,20] Gahmuret: Blamires 1966 313 [250,29-250,30] Gattung: Haferland 1988 327 Anm. 184 [250,29-250,30], Schu 2002 290 [250,26-250,30], 388 [250,26-250,30] Gawan: Blamires 1966 313 [250,29-250,30] Gawan-Handlung: Sauer, M. 1981 259 Anm. 1 [250,24-250,30] Geographie: Sterling-Hellenbrand 2001 114 [250,26-250,30], [250,17-251,20], Schmitz, B. 2004 27 [250,26-250,30] Gesamtwürdigung: Springer 1959 244 [250,26-250,30], Sacker 1963 169 [250,26-250,30], Bumke 1964a 62 [250,26-250,30], Gernentz 1966a 645 [250,22-250,30], Gernentz 1966b 500 [250,22-250,30], Poag 1972a 60 [250,26-250,30], Kratz, H. 1973a 260 [250,26-250,30], Springer 1975b 207 [250,26-250,30], Bumke 1991d 142 [250,26-250,30], Bumke 1997a 107 [250,26-250,30], Wesseling 1998a 1544 [250,26-250,30], Bumke 2004 136 [250,26-250,30] Geschichte: Passage 1984 188 [250,25-251,20], Schmitz, B. 2004 27 [250,26-250,30] Gottfried von Straßburg: Haug 1975c 86 Anm. 8 [250,26-250,30], Bayer, Hans 1978 62 Anm. 18 [250,26-250,30], Haruta 1978 244 [250,29-250,30], Haug 1989k 639 Anm. 8 [250,26-250,30] Gral: San-Marte 1861 244 [250,22-250,30], Birch-Hirschfeld 1877 262-63 [250,20-251,2], Rahn 1933 140-41 [250,24-251,2], Burdach 1938 508 [250,29-250,30], 524 [250,26-250,30], 532 [250,26-250,30], 536 [250,22-250,30], Kiene 1944 8 [250,24-250,30], Weber, G. 1948 51 [250,24-250,30], Mergell 1951b 42 Anm. 1 [250,29-250,30], Mergell 1952b 42 Anm. 1 [250,29-250,30], Loomis 1959b 293 Anm. 3 [250,25-250,30], Loomis 1963b 206 Anm. 1 [250,26-250,30], Hempel, H. 1967 125 [250,29-250,30], Mockenhaupt 1968 151 [250,26-250,30], Burdach 1974 508 [250,29-250,30], 524 [250,26-250,30], 532 [250,26-250,30], 536 [250,22-250,30], Dewald 1975 87 Anm. 59 [250,25-251,24], 231 [250,26-250,30], 250 [250,26-250,30], 274 [250,24-252,1], Schult 1975 114 [250,24-250,30], Schäfer, H. 1983 72 [250,29-251,7], 79 [250,17-251,4], Schäfer, H. 1985 76 [250,29-251,7], 83 [250,17-251,4], Loomis 1991 206 Anm. 1 [250,26-250,30], Haferland 1994a 44 [250,22-251,24] Handschriftliches: Lampe 1990 175 [250,29-251,18], Beckers 1992 84, 85, 86 Hartmann von Aue: Wapnewski 1955 163 [250,26-250,30], Wapnewski 1982 163 [250,26-250,30] Heinrich von dem Türlin: Jillings 1980 137 Anm. 17 [250,29-250,30], Keller, J. 1997 38 Anm. 17 [250,26-250,30], 284 Anm. 19 [250,26-250,30] Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 227 Anm. 332 [250,26-250,30], 255 [250,26-250,30] Herzeloyde: Blamires 1966 313 [250,29-250,30], Niermann 1998 108 [250,17-251,1] heterodoxe Einflüsse: Rahn 1933 140-41 [250,24-251,2], Bayer, Hans 1978 62 Anm. 18 [250,26-250,30] höfischer Roman: Kiene 1944 8 [250,24-250,30], Green 1979a 148 [250,22-251,20], Haferland 1988 327 Anm. 184 [250,29-250,30], Schu 2002 290 [250,26-250,30], 388 [250,26-250,30] höfisches Leben: Mersmann 1971 119 [250,28-250,30], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Individualität: Blamires 1966 313 [250,29-250,30], Buschinger 2002b 189 [250,26-250,30] indoeur. Mythologie: Pastré 1993c 371 [250,26-250,30] Interpretation: Misch 1927 248 [250,29-250,30], Weber, G. 1948 51 [250,24-250,30], Essen 1967 129 [250,24-250,30], Mersmann 1971 119 [250,28-250,30], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Poag 1972a 60 [250,26-250,30], Wieners 1973 106 [250,26-250,30], Dewald 1975 87 Anm. 59 [250,25-251,24], 231 [250,26-250,30], 250 [250,26-250,30], 274 [250,24-252,1], Schult 1975 114 [250,24-250,30], Wiesinger 1976a 256 [250,26-250,30], Haruta 1978 244 [250,29-250,30], Trachsler, E. 1979 163 [250,24-250,30], Huber, H. 1981 295 Anm. 374 [250,26-250,30], Sauer, M. 1981 259 Anm. 1 [250,24-250,30], Green 1982b 118 Anm. 97 [250,26-250,30], 203 Anm. 95 [250,25-251,24], 210 Anm. 122 [249,11-252,8], 211 [250,26-250,30], Brall 1983b 294 Anm. 5 [250,29-250,30], Passage 1984 188 [250,25-251,20], Haferland 1988 327 Anm. 184 [250,29-250,30], Lampe 1990 175 [250,29-251,18], Steppich 1993 395 [250,26-250,30], Steppich 1999 40 [250,26-250,30], 56 [250,26-250,30] Inzest: Buschinger 1985a 132 [249,23-252,15], Buschinger 1994d 52 [249,23-252,15], Buschinger 1995e 42 Anm. 80 [249,23-252,15], Buschinger 1995h 72 [249,23-252,15], Buschinger 2001h 82 [249,23-252,15] Ironie: Green 1979a 148 [250,22-251,20] Jenseitsmotive: Braches 1961 215 Anm. 871 [250,24-250,30], Dick, E. 1978a 71 [250,26-250,30] Jüngerer Titurel: Passage 1984 188 [250,25-251,20] Kommentar: Curschmann und Glier 1980 788 [250,17-251,20], Nellmann 1994c 590 [250,26-250,30], 678 [250,26-250,30], Kordt 1997 21 [250,26-250,30], 32 Anm. 26 [250,26-251,1], 49 [250,26-250,30], 135 Anm. 2 [250,12-253,8], 155 [250,19-250,30], 194 [250,24-250,30], Backes, S. 1999 5 [249,1-251,2], 15-16 [250,22-251,24], 16 [250,26-250,30] Kommunikation: Urscheler 2002 164 [250,17-251,20], 165 [250,17-251,20], Schnyder, M. 2003 319 [250,17-251,4] Kyot: Weber, G. 1928 55 Anm. 68 [250,25-250,30], 150 [250,26-250,30], Stockum 1941 17 [250,26-250,30], Mergell 1951b 42 Anm. 1 [250,29-250,30], Mergell 1952b 42 Anm. 1 [250,29-250,30], Haferland 1994a 44 [250,22-251,24] Lichtmetaphorik: Huber, H. 1981 295 Anm. 374 [250,26-250,30] Literaturgeschichte: Bertau 1972/73 781 [249,26-251,20], [249,26-251,20] Longinuslegende: Burdach 1938 508 [250,29-250,30], 524 [250,26-250,30], 532 [250,26-250,30], 536 [250,22-250,30], Burdach 1974 508 [250,29-250,30], 524 [250,26-250,30], 532 [250,26-250,30], 536 [250,22-250,30] Männerfiguren: Pörksen, G. und Pörksen, U. 1980 266 Anm. 22 [250,17-251,20], Steppich 1993 395 [250,26-250,30], Caples 1975/76 546 [250,26-250,30] Märchen: Junk 1912 85 [250,26-250,30], Bücksteeg 2001 40 [250,26-250,30] Minne u. Ehe: Wapnewski 1955 163 [250,26-250,30], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Dewald 1975 87 Anm. 59 [250,25-251,24], 231 [250,26-250,30], 250 [250,26-250,30], 274 [250,24-252,1], Green 1979a 148 [250,22-251,20], Wapnewski 1982 163 [250,26-250,30], Sterling-Hellenbrand 2001 114 [250,26-250,30], [250,17-251,20] Mündlichkeit: Sussman 1995 68 [250,25-250,30] Mythos u. Mythologie: Loomis 1963b 206 Anm. 1 [250,26-250,30], Loomis 1991 206 Anm. 1 [250,26-250,30] Namen: Passage 1984 188 [250,25-251,20], Braunagel 1999 14 [250,13-252,8], Schmitz, B. 2004 27 [250,26-250,30] Orient: Schäfer, H. 1983 72 [250,29-251,7], 79 [250,17-251,4], Schäfer, H. 1985 76 [250,29-251,7], 83 [250,17-251,4] Pädagogik: Heise 1957 45 [249,11-253,9], 48 [250,3-251,24], Essen 1967 129 [250,24-250,30] Parzival: Blamires 1966 313 [250,29-250,30], Pörksen, G. und Pörksen, U. 1980 266 Anm. 22 [250,17-251,20] Prolog: Wapnewski 1955 163 [250,26-250,30], Wapnewski 1982 163 [250,26-250,30] Psychologie: Pörksen, G. und Pörksen, U. 1980 266 Anm. 22 [250,17-251,20], Buschinger 1995h 72 [249,23-252,15], Sussman 1995 68 [250,25-250,30], Fritsch-Rößler 2002b 124 [250,29-250,30] Quellen - allgemein: Heinzel 1893 84 [250,26-250,30], 102 [250,24-250,30], Junk 1912 85 [250,26-250,30], Weber, G. 1928 55 Anm. 68 [250,25-250,30], 150 [250,26-250,30], Burdach 1938 508 [250,29-250,30], 524 [250,26-250,30], 532 [250,26-250,30], 536 [250,22-250,30], Stockum 1941 17 [250,26-250,30], Mergell 1951b 42 Anm. 1 [250,29-250,30], Mergell 1952b 42 Anm. 1 [250,29-250,30], Hempel, H. 1967 125 [250,29-250,30], Poag 1972a 60 [250,26-250,30], Burdach 1974 508 [250,29-250,30], 524 [250,26-250,30], 532 [250,26-250,30], 536 [250,22-250,30], Schult 1975 114 [250,24-250,30], Passage 1984 188 [250,25-251,20], Haferland 1994a 44 [250,22-251,24], Haferland 1994b 263 [249,11-250,30], Horchler 2004 31 [250,24-250,30] Quellen - Chrétien: Birch-Hirschfeld 1877 262-63 [250,20-251,2], Weber, G. 1928 55 Anm. 68 [250,25-250,30], 150 [250,26-250,30], Rachbauer 1934 156 [250,24-250,30], Rachbauer 1970 156 [250,24-250,30], Rachbauer 1980 156 [250,24-250,30], Sutter 2003 181-82 [250,29-251,20] Quellen - Keltisches: Loomis 1959b 293 Anm. 3 [250,25-250,30], Loomis 1963b 206 Anm. 1 [250,26-250,30], Loomis 1991 206 Anm. 1 [250,26-250,30], Steppich 1999 40 [250,26-250,30], 56 [250,26-250,30] Raum u. Bewegung: Wiesinger 1976a 256 [250,26-250,30], Trachsler, E. 1979 163 [250,24-250,30], Glaser 2004 78-79 [250,20-250,30] Realismus: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Reichtum u. materialer Besitz: Mersmann 1971 119 [250,28-250,30] Religion: San-Marte 1861 244 [250,22-250,30], Mockenhaupt 1942 151 [250,26-250,30], Weber, G. 1948 51 [250,24-250,30], Mergell 1952b 42 Anm. 1 [250,29-250,30], Wapnewski 1955 163 [250,26-250,30], Koppitz 1959 350 [250,29-250,30], Mockenhaupt 1968 151 [250,26-250,30], Wieners 1973 106 [250,26-250,30], Wapnewski 1982 163 [250,26-250,30], Lampe 1990 175 [250,29-251,18], Haferland 1994b 263 [249,11-250,30] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Jillings 1980 137 Anm. 17 [250,29-250,30], Passage 1984 188 [250,25-251,20], Keller, J. 1997 38 Anm. 17 [250,26-250,30], 284 Anm. 19 [250,26-250,30] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Niermann 1998 108 [250,17-251,1], Wagemann 1998 31 [250,29-250,30] Rhetorik: Nellmann 1973a 90 [250,22-251,24] Ritterethik: Kiene 1944 8 [250,24-250,30], Mockenhaupt 1968 151 [250,26-250,30], Wieners 1973 106 [250,26-250,30] Ritterkampf u. Turnierwesen: Schröder, J. 2004 227 Anm. 332 [250,26-250,30], 255 [250,26-250,30] Ritterorden: Schäfer, H. 1985 76 [250,29-251,7], 83 [250,17-251,4] Rittertum: Green 1979a 148 [250,22-251,20], Trachsler, E. 1979 163 [250,24-250,30] Rudolf von Ems: Haug 1989k 639 Anm. 8 [250,26-250,30] Schachspielmetaphorik: Schmitz, B. 2004 27 [250,26-250,30] Schicksal u. Fortuna: Scharmann 1935b 70 [250,28-250,30] Schionatulander: Passage 1984 188 [250,25-251,20] Schönheit: Huber, H. 1981 295 Anm. 374 [250,26-250,30] Schriftlichkeit: Haferland 1994a 44 [250,22-251,24] Schuld: Mockenhaupt 1968 151 [250,26-250,30], Wieners 1973 106 [250,26-250,30] Sexuelles u. Geschlechterbeziehungen: Buschinger 1985a 132 [249,23-252,15], Buschinger 1994d 52 [249,23-252,15], Buschinger 1995e 42 Anm. 80 [249,23-252,15], Buschinger 1995h 72 [249,23-252,15], Buschinger 2001h 82 [249,23-252,15], Fritsch-Rößler 2002b 124 [250,29-250,30] Sigune: Niermann 1998 108 [250,17-251,1], Braunagel 1999 14 [250,13-252,8] Soziologie: Brall 1983b 294 Anm. 5 [250,29-250,30] Sprache: Dewald 1975 87 Anm. 59 [250,25-251,24], 231 [250,26-250,30], 250 [250,26-250,30], 274 [250,24-252,1], Beckers 1992 84, 85, 86, Wiktorowicz 1999 51 [250,29-250,30] Steiner, Rudolf (Anthroposophie): Lampe 1990 175 [250,29-251,18], Sussman 1995 68 [250,25-250,30] Stil: Weber, G. 1928 55 Anm. 68 [250,25-250,30], 150 [250,26-250,30], Mergell 1943 5 [250,26-250,30], 132 Anm. 30 [250,26-250,30], 149-50 [250,22-250,30], 158 [250,29-250,30], 197 [250,26-250,30], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18] Subjektivität: Dewald 1975 87 Anm. 59 [250,25-251,24], 231 [250,26-250,30], 250 [250,26-250,30], 274 [250,24-252,1] Sünde: Wapnewski 1955 163 [250,26-250,30], Mockenhaupt 1968 151 [250,26-250,30], Wapnewski 1982 163 [250,26-250,30] Syntax: Erbe 1878 12 [250,29-250,30] Titurel: Passage 1984 188 [250,25-251,20], Braunagel 1999 14 [250,13-252,8] Tod: Walther-Vuškans 2004 136 Anm. 196 [250,26-250,30] Trevrizent: Blamires 1966 313 [250,29-250,30] tumpheit: Haas, A. 1964 21 Anm. 19 [250,29-250,30], 111 [250,24-250,30], 243 [250,29-250,30] Überlieferung: Nock 1968 171, Beckers 1992 84, 85, 86 Übersetzung: Nellmann 1994c 590 [250,26-250,30], 678 [250,26-250,30] Übersetzungsproblematik: Huby, Michel 1980b 421 [250,29-250,30] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Delabar 1990 260 [250,22-251,20], Sutter 2003 181-82 [250,29-251,20] vreude: Steppich 1999 40 [250,26-250,30], 56 [250,26-250,30] Wahrnehmung, Blick usw: Fritsch-Rößler 2002b 124 [250,29-250,30] Werkstruktur: Henzen 1951 208 [250,29-250,30], Wapnewski 1955 163 [250,26-250,30], Henzen 1966 146 [250,29-250,30], Poag 1972a 60 [250,26-250,30], Hirschberg 1976 88 Anm. 11 [250,26-250,30], 132 [250,26-250,30], Green 1979a 148 [250,22-251,20], Sauer, M. 1981 259 Anm. 1 [250,24-250,30], Wapnewski 1982 163 [250,26-250,30], Pastré 1993c 371 [250,26-250,30] Willehalm: Schäfer, H. 1983 72 [250,29-251,7], 79 [250,17-251,4], Schäfer, H. 1985 76 [250,29-251,7], 83 [250,17-251,4] Wolfram - Biographie: Poag 1972a 60 [250,26-250,30] Wortschatz: Scharmann 1935b 70 [250,28-250,30], Mersmann 1971 119 [250,28-250,30], Wiesinger 1976a 256 [250,26-250,30], Trachsler, E. 1979 163 [250,24-250,30] Zahlenkomposition: Wapnewski 1955 163 [250,26-250,30], Wapnewski 1982 163 [250,26-250,30], Lampe 1990 175 [250,29-251,18] Zeitverhältnisse: Sauer, M. 1981 259 Anm. 1 [250,24-250,30], Haferland 1994b 263 [249,11-250,30], Sutter 2003 181-82 [250,29-251,20] zwîvel: Wapnewski 1955 163 [250,26-250,30], Wapnewski 1982 163 [250,26-250,30] | |
(zu den versspezifischen Angaben) |