250,30 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)[Zu 250,29]
Adaptation: Burdach 1938 524 [250,26-250,30], Stockum 1941 17 [250,26-250,30], Mergell 1943 5 [250,26-250,30], 132 Anm. 30 [250,26-250,30], 149-50 [250,22-250,30], 158 [250,29-250,30], 197 [250,26-250,30], Burdach 1974 524 [250,26-250,30], Backes, S. 1999 5 [249,1-251,2], 16 [250,26-250,30]
Bildungsroman: Gerhard 1926 30 Anm. 3 [250,26-250,30], Gerhard 1968 30 Anm. 3 [250,26-250,30]
Blutstropfenepisode: Dewald 1975 87 Anm. 59 [250,25-251,24]
Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 313 [250,29-250,30], Johnson, L. 1978b 292 [250,12-251,1]
Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Bertau 1972/73 781 [249,26-251,20], Weber, G. 1928 150 [250,26-250,30]
Erzähltechnik: Nellmann 1973a 90 [250,22-251,24], Hirschberg 1976 88 Anm. 11 [250,26-250,30], 132 [250,26-250,30], Curschmann und Glier 1980 788 [250,17-251,20], Green 1982b 118 Anm. 97 [250,26-250,30], 203 Anm. 95 [250,25-251,24], 210 Anm. 122 [249,11-252,8], 211 [250,26-250,30], Schu 2002 290 [250,26-250,30], 388 [250,26-250,30], Urscheler 2002 164 [250,17-251,20], 165 [250,17-251,20]
Exotisches: Lecouteux 1981a 285 [250,26-250,30]
Feirefiz: Caples 1975/76 546 [250,26-250,30]
Fragen: Kordt 1997 135 Anm. 2 [250,12-253,8]
Geographie: Backes, S. 1999 16 [250,26-250,30], Sterling-Hellenbrand 2001 114 [250,26-250,30], [250,17-251,20], Schmitz, B. 2004 27 [250,26-250,30]
Gottfried von Straßburg: Haug 1975c 86 Anm. 8 [250,26-250,30], Haruta 1978 244 [250,29-250,30], Haug 1989k 639 Anm. 8 [250,26-250,30]
Gral: San-Marte 1861 244 [250,22-250,30], Birch-Hirschfeld 1877 262-63 [250,20-251,2], Weber, G. 1928 55 Anm. 68 [250,25-250,30], Burdach 1938 508 [250,29-250,30], 536 [250,22-250,30], Kiene 1944 8 [250,24-250,30], Mergell 1951b 42 Anm. 1 [250,29-250,30], Mergell 1952b 42 Anm. 1 [250,29-250,30], Loomis 1963b 206 Anm. 1 [250,26-250,30], Bumke 1964a 62 [250,26-250,30], Hempel, H. 1967 125 [250,29-250,30], Poag 1972a 60 [250,26-250,30], Burdach 1974 508 [250,29-250,30], 536 [250,22-250,30], Schäfer, H. 1983 72 [250,29-251,7], 79 [250,17-251,4], Schäfer, H. 1985 76 [250,29-251,7], 83 [250,17-251,4], Loomis 1991 206 Anm. 1 [250,26-250,30], Nellmann 1994c 590 [250,26-250,30], 678 [250,26-250,30], Bumke 1997a 107 [250,26-250,30], Wesseling 1998a 1544 [250,26-250,30], Bumke 2004 136 [250,26-250,30]
Handschriftliches: Beckers 1992 84, 85, 86
Herrschaft: Schröder, J. 2004 227 Anm. 332 [250,26-250,30], 255 [250,26-250,30]
heterodoxe Einflüsse: Rahn 1933 140-41 [250,24-251,2], Bayer, Hans 1978 62 Anm. 18 [250,26-250,30]
Individualität: Buschinger 2002b 189 [250,26-250,30]
indoeur. Mythologie: Pastré 1993c 371 [250,26-250,30]
Interpretation: Misch 1927 248 [250,29-250,30], Weber, G. 1948 51 [250,24-250,30], Springer 1959 244 [250,26-250,30], Sacker 1963 169 [250,26-250,30], Gernentz 1966a 645 [250,22-250,30], Gernentz 1966b 500 [250,22-250,30], Mersmann 1971 119 [250,28-250,30], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Kratz, H. 1973a 260 [250,26-250,30], Wieners 1973 106 [250,26-250,30], Dewald 1975 231 [250,26-250,30], 250 [250,26-250,30], 274 [250,24-252,1], Schult 1975 114 [250,24-250,30], Springer 1975b 207 [250,26-250,30], Wiesinger 1976a 256 [250,26-250,30], Huber, H. 1981 295 Anm. 374 [250,26-250,30], Brall 1983b 294 Anm. 5 [250,29-250,30], Haferland 1988 327 Anm. 184 [250,29-250,30], Lampe 1990 175 [250,29-251,18], Bumke 1991d 142 [250,26-250,30], Steppich 1993 395 [250,26-250,30], Nellmann 1994c 590 [250,26-250,30], Kordt 1997 21 [250,26-250,30], 32 Anm. 26 [250,26-251,1], 49 [250,26-250,30], 155 [250,19-250,30], 194 [250,24-250,30], Backes, S. 1999 15-16 [250,22-251,24], 16 [250,26-250,30], Steppich 1999 40 [250,26-250,30], 56 [250,26-250,30]
Inzest: Buschinger 1985a 132 [249,23-252,15], Buschinger 1994d 52 [249,23-252,15], Buschinger 1995e 42 Anm. 80 [249,23-252,15], Buschinger 1995h 72 [249,23-252,15], Buschinger 2001h 82 [249,23-252,15]
Ironie: Green 1979a 148 [250,22-251,20]
Jenseitsmotive: Braches 1961 215 Anm. 871 [250,24-250,30], Dick, E. 1978a 71 [250,26-250,30]
Kommunikation: Schnyder, M. 2003 319 [250,17-251,4]
Märchen: Bücksteeg 2001 40 [250,26-250,30]
Namen: Passage 1984 188 [250,25-251,20]
Pädagogik: Essen 1967 129 [250,24-250,30]
Parzival: Pörksen, G. und Pörksen, U. 1980 266 Anm. 22 [250,17-251,20]
Psychologie: Sussman 1995 68 [250,25-250,30]
Quellen - allgemein: Heinzel 1893 84 [250,26-250,30], 102 [250,24-250,30], Junk 1912 85 [250,26-250,30], Burdach 1938 532 [250,26-250,30], Burdach 1974 532 [250,26-250,30], Haferland 1994a 44 [250,22-251,24], Horchler 2004 31 [250,24-250,30]
Quellen - Chrétien: Rachbauer 1934 156 [250,24-250,30], Rachbauer 1970 156 [250,24-250,30], Rachbauer 1980 156 [250,24-250,30]
Quellen - Keltisches: Loomis 1959b 293 Anm. 3 [250,25-250,30]
Raum u. Bewegung: Trachsler, E. 1979 163 [250,24-250,30], Glaser 2004 78-79 [250,20-250,30]
Religion: Mockenhaupt 1942 151 [250,26-250,30], Wapnewski 1955 163 [250,26-250,30], Koppitz 1959 350 [250,29-250,30], Mockenhaupt 1968 151 [250,26-250,30], Wapnewski 1982 163 [250,26-250,30], Haferland 1994b 263 [249,11-250,30]
Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Jillings 1980 137 Anm. 17 [250,29-250,30], Keller, J. 1997 38 Anm. 17 [250,26-250,30], 284 Anm. 19 [250,26-250,30]
Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Wagemann 1998 31 [250,29-250,30]
Schicksal u. Fortuna: Scharmann 1935b 70 [250,28-250,30]
Sigune: Heise 1957 45 [249,11-253,9], 48 [250,3-251,24], Niermann 1998 108 [250,17-251,1], Backes, S. 1999 5 [249,1-251,2], Braunagel 1999 14 [250,13-252,8]
Sprache: Wiktorowicz 1999 51 [250,29-250,30]
Stil: Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18]
Syntax: Erbe 1878 12 [250,29-250,30]
Tod: Walther-Vuškans 2004 136 Anm. 196 [250,26-250,30]
tumpheit: Haas, A. 1964 21 Anm. 19 [250,29-250,30], 111 [250,24-250,30], 243 [250,29-250,30]
Überlieferung: Nock 1968 171
Übersetzungsproblematik: Huby, Michel 1980b 421 [250,29-250,30]
Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Delabar 1990 260 [250,22-251,20], Sutter 2003 181-82 [250,29-251,20]
Wahrnehmung, Blick usw: Fritsch-Rößler 2002b 124 [250,29-250,30]
Werkstruktur: Henzen 1951 208 [250,29-250,30], Henzen 1966 146 [250,29-250,30], Sauer, M. 1981 259 Anm. 1 [250,24-250,30]
 [Zu 251, 1]