264,28 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben)
Adaptation: Lichtenstein 1897 40 [264,25-264,30], 62 [262,20-265,17], Weber, G. 1928 45 [264,25-264,30], Rachbauer 1934 187, Fourquet 1938b 125-28 [262,19-265,4], Mergell 1943 84 [264,25-265,3], Fourquet 1966b 98-100 [262,19-265,4], Rachbauer 1970 187, Rachbauer 1980 187 Ausgabe: Nellmann 1994c 633 [264,1-264,30] âventiure: Green 1978c 142 [262,1-265,19] Bibliographie: Bumke 1970a 236 [263,1-264,30], 299 [264,1-264,30] Blutstropfenepisode: Dewald 1975 264 Anm. 8 [264,25-264,29] Bogengleichnis: Groos 1972 401 [264,25-264,29] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Heinzle 1975 32 [263,1-264,30], Boigs 1987 375 [264,1-264,30] Erzähler: Nellmann 1973a 134 Anm. 26 [264,1-264,30], 153 Anm. 24 [264,26-264,29] Erzähltechnik: Herchenbach 1911 41 [264,26-264,29], 79 [264,25-264,30], Mergell 1943 84 [264,25-265,3], Salmon, Paul 1960 109 [264,1-264,30], 110 [264,1-264,30], Groos 1972 401 [264,25-264,29], Nellmann 1973a 134 Anm. 26 [264,1-264,30], 153 Anm. 24 [264,26-264,29], Dewald 1975 264 Anm. 8 [264,25-264,29], Hirschberg 1976 20 Anm. 8 [264,26-264,29], 21 [263,1-265,9], 22 [264,26-264,29], Green 1978c 142 [262,1-265,19], Green 1982b 123 Anm. 110 [264,25-264,30] Fiktionalität: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Forschungsbericht: Bumke 1970a 236 [263,1-264,30], 299 [264,1-264,30] Frauen (allgemein): Kinzel 1889 62 [264,26-264,30], Meyer zur Capellen 1993 120 [264,16-264,30] Frauenfiguren: Meyer zur Capellen 1993 120 [264,16-264,30] Gawan-Handlung: Boigs 1987 375 [264,1-264,30] Geschichte: Roßkopf 1972 302 [264,1-264,30], 303 [264,26-264,29] Gottfried von Straßburg: Haruta 1978 212 Anm. 183 [264,26-264,28] Gral: Kiene 1944 15 [264,25-264,29], Mockenhaupt 1968 45 [264,26-264,29], 47 [264,28-264,29], Dewald 1975 264 Anm. 8 [264,25-264,29], Heinzle 1975 32 [263,1-264,30] höfischer Roman: Kiene 1944 15 [264,25-264,29] höfisches Leben: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] indoeur. Mythologie: Meyer zur Capellen 1993 120 [264,16-264,30] Interpretation: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Roßkopf 1972 302 [264,1-264,30], 303 [264,26-264,29], Wieners 1973 6 [264,26-264,29], 26 [264,26-264,29], Dewald 1975 264 Anm. 8 [264,25-264,29], Green 1978c 142 [262,1-265,19], Haruta 1978 212 Anm. 183 [264,26-264,28], Green 1982b 123 Anm. 110 [264,25-264,30], Muschg 1993a 87 [264,25-264,30] Ironie: Salmon, Paul 1960 109 [264,1-264,30], 110 [264,1-264,30] Ither: Roßkopf 1972 302 [264,1-264,30], 303 [264,26-264,29] Juristisches: Bostock 1952b 34-35 [264,1-264,30] Kommentar: Nellmann 1994c 633 [264,1-264,30], Backes, S. 1999 99 [264,26-264,29] Kyot: Lichtenstein 1897 40 [264,25-264,30], 62 [262,20-265,17], Weber, G. 1928 45 [264,25-264,30] Literaturgeschichte: Bertau 1972/73 828 [264,1-264,30], [264,1-264,30] Minne u. Ehe: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Dewald 1975 264 Anm. 8 [264,25-264,29], Meyer zur Capellen 1993 120 [264,16-264,30] Minnesang: Meyer zur Capellen 1993 120 [264,16-264,30] Philologie: Green 1978c 142 [262,1-265,19] Psychologie: Meyer zur Capellen 1993 120 [264,16-264,30] Quellen - allgemein: Lichtenstein 1897 40 [264,25-264,30], 62 [262,20-265,17], Weber, G. 1928 45 [264,25-264,30], Fourquet 1938b 125-28 [262,19-265,4], Fourquet 1966b 98-100 [262,19-265,4] Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 40 [264,25-264,30], 62 [262,20-265,17], Weber, G. 1928 45 [264,25-264,30], Rachbauer 1934 187, Fourquet 1938b 125-28 [262,19-265,4], Fourquet 1966b 98-100 [262,19-265,4], Rachbauer 1970 187, Heinzle 1975 32 [263,1-264,30], Rachbauer 1980 187 Realismus: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Religion: Mockenhaupt 1942 45 [264,26-264,29], 47 [264,28-264,29], Mockenhaupt 1968 45 [264,26-264,29], 47 [264,28-264,29], Wieners 1973 6 [264,26-264,29], 26 [264,26-264,29], Thelen 1989 661 [264,26-264,29] Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Muschg 1993a 87 [264,25-264,30] Rhetorik: Nellmann 1973a 134 Anm. 26 [264,1-264,30], 153 Anm. 24 [264,26-264,29] Ritterethik: Kiene 1944 15 [264,25-264,29], Mockenhaupt 1968 45 [264,26-264,29], 47 [264,28-264,29], Wieners 1973 6 [264,26-264,29], 26 [264,26-264,29] Rittertum: Green 1978a 32 [264,26-264,29], Green 1978c 142 [262,1-265,19] Schuld: Mockenhaupt 1968 45 [264,26-264,29], 47 [264,28-264,29], Wieners 1973 6 [264,26-264,29], 26 [264,26-264,29] Sprache: Dewald 1975 264 Anm. 8 [264,25-264,29] Stil: Lichtenstein 1897 40 [264,25-264,30], 62 [262,20-265,17], Weber, G. 1928 45 [264,25-264,30], Mergell 1943 84 [264,25-265,3], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18] Subjektivität: Dewald 1975 264 Anm. 8 [264,25-264,29] Sünde: Mockenhaupt 1968 45 [264,26-264,29], 47 [264,28-264,29] Syntax: Erbe 1878 31 [264,26-264,28], Herchenbach 1911 41 [264,26-264,29], 79 [264,25-264,30], Mourek 1911 29 [264,27-264,28] Titurel: Heinzle 1975 32 [263,1-264,30] Traummotivik: Roßkopf 1972 302 [264,1-264,30], 303 [264,26-264,29] Überlieferung: Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 110 [264,28-266,18] Übersetzung: Nellmann 1994c 633 [264,1-264,30] Werkstruktur: Hirschberg 1976 20 Anm. 8 [264,26-264,29], 21 [263,1-265,9], 22 [264,26-264,29] Willehalm: Thelen 1989 661 [264,26-264,29]
	(zu den versspezifischen Angaben)