306,23 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)[Zu 306,22]
Abbildungen: Stephan-Chlustin 2004 222 [306,10-307,6]
Adaptation: Mergell 1943 15 Anm. 4 [306,21-306,23], Wolf, A. 1985a 42 [305,14-307,12], 43, 44, Wolf, A. 1999h 306, [305,14-307,12], 307
Blutstropfenepisode: Dewald 1975 106 Anm. 5 [306,22-306,23]
Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 120 [306,10-306,29], 122 [306,10-306,29], Ortmann 1972 130 [306,21-307,12], Johnson, L. 1978a 279 [306,22-306,29], Johnson, L. 1978c 294 [306,21-307,12]
Cunneware: Garnerus 1999 209-10 [305,16-307,5]
Erzähltechnik: Hirschberg 1976 119 [306,21-306,29], Garnerus 1999 205 [305,14-307,12], 248
Farben u. Farbensymbolik: Jacobsohn 1915 40, 104, Gilmour 2000 282 [306,22-306,23]
Frauen (allgemein): Garnerus 1999 209-10 [305,16-307,5]
groteske Figuren: Michel 1976 286 Anm. 101.1 [306,21-306,23]
höfisches Leben: Garnerus 1999 214 [305,27-307,6], Gilmour 2000 197 [306,21-306,23]
indoeur. Mythologie: Pastré 1993c 297 [306,9-307,6], 298 [306,16-307,12], Pastré 1993f 367 [306,9-307,6], 368 [306,16-308,10]
Interpretation: Kashiwagi 1970 5 [306,22-306,27], Schröder, Walter Johannes und Hollandt 1971 421 Anm. 70, Huth 1972 103 Anm. 113, 404 [185,21-815,26], Kratz, H. 1973a 214 Anm. 19 [306,10-306,25], 272 [305,7-308,22], Huber, H. 1981 56 [306,21-306,25], 209 [306,21-306,28], 278 Anm. 261, 280 Anm. 266 [306,21-306,28], 288 Anm. 321 [306,21-306,28], Yeandle 1984 55 [306,21-306,23], 391, Garnerus 1999 209-10 [305,16-307,5], 214 [305,27-307,6], Izumiya 2002 180 [306,21-306,28], 192 [306,21-306,28]
Jungfräulichkeit: Müller, Maria E 1995 208 [306,22-306,28]
Kleidung, Mode, Textilien: Brüggen 1993 207 Anm. 39 [306,10-307,12]
Körper u. Körperteile: Gilmour 2000 282 [306,22-306,23]
Lichtmetaphorik: Cessari 2000 77 [306,21-306,28], Steinmetz, R. 2002 516
Metaphorik u. Bildlichkeit: Fuchs-Jolie 2004 266 [306,21-306,27]
Minne u. Ehe: Wilmanns 1916 492 Anm. 302, 493 Anm. 315, Garnerus 1999 209-10 [305,16-307,5], 214 [305,27-307,6]
Motivik: Gilmour 2000 130
Quellen - Chrétien: Lichtenstein 1897 51 [306,23-306,28], Rachbauer 1934 205 [306,23-306,28], Rachbauer 1970 205 [306,23-306,28], Rachbauer 1980 205 [306,23-306,28]
Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Belitz 1978 342 Anm. 126 [306,22-306,29], Kern, Peter 1981 176 Anm. 45 [306,10-307,12]
Rezeption (sekundär - Neuzeit): Wagemann 1998 201 [306,10-307,6]
Schönheit: San-Marte 1862b 158 [306,22-306,28], Hahn, I. 1975 205 Anm. 7, 207 [306,22-306,23], 227 Anm. 97 [306,21-306,23], 229 [306,21-306,23], Wenzel, H. 1996c 90 [306,21-306,28], Garnerus 1999 212 [306,22-306,23], 222-23 [306,22-306,23], 229, 249, Gilmour 2000 200 [306,21-306,23], 281 [306,22-306,23], Pappas 2001 158 [306,22-306,28], 161 [306,22-306,23]
Schriftlichkeit: Wandhoff 1996 221 [306,21-306,28]
Sprache: Mohr 1979l 230-31 [306,21-306,28]
Stil: Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18]
Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Delabar 1990 230 [306,9-307,12]
Wortschatz: Riemer, G. 1906 28, 34, Gilmour 2000 200 [306,21-306,23]
 [Zu 306,24]