| 324,20 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben) | |
|
Abbildungen: Schirok 1985 190 [324,19-324,21], Stephan-Chlustin 2004 131 [324,19-324,21]
Adaptation: Hilka 1932 719 [324,19-324,21], Rachbauer 1934 211 [324,19-324,21], Mergell 1943 101 Anm. 52 [324,19-324,21], 102 [324,19-324,24], Rachbauer 1970 211 [324,19-324,21], Rachbauer 1980 211 [324,19-324,21] Antikonie: Steppich 2000 187 [320,22-324,30] Artusepik: Ringeler 2000 150 [324,11-324,21] Ausgabe: Nellmann 1994c 621 Bene: Steppich 2000 187 [320,22-324,30] Charakterisierung: Ortmann 1972 19 [324,15-324,21], Ringeler 2000 150 [324,11-324,21] Datierung: Mertens, V. 2004 248 [324,20-324,21] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Sutter 2003 90 Anm. 342 [324,19-324,21] Erzähltechnik: Mergell 1943 101 Anm. 52 [324,19-324,21], 102 [324,19-324,24], Ortmann 1972 19 [324,15-324,21], Parshall 1981 249 Anm. 7 [322,1-325,30], Green 1982b 141 Anm. 34 [324,19-324,24], 280 [324,19-324,21], Urscheler 2002 99 [324,3-324,30], 119 [324,3-324,30], Mertens, V. 2004 248 [324,20-324,21] Fiktionalität: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Mertens, V. 2004 248 [324,20-324,21] Fuetrer, Ulrich: Nyholm 1964 162 [324,11-325,10] Gattung: Haferland 1988 113 [324,19-324,21] Geographie: Mertens, V. 2004 248 [324,20-324,21] Gesamtwürdigung: Kratz, H. 1973a 276 [323,1-325,16] Geschichte: Mettke 1981 25 [324,19-324,21], Steppich 2000 187 [320,22-324,30], Mertens, V. 2004 248 [324,20-324,21] Gönner: Mettke 1981 25 [324,19-324,21], Lemmer 1982 60, Weigelt 1995 18 [324,19-324,21] Gral: Mertens, V. 2004 248 [324,20-324,21] Handschriftliches: Stephan-Chlustin 2004 131 [324,19-324,21] höfischer Roman: Haferland 1988 113 [324,19-324,21] höfisches Leben: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Ehrismann, O. 1995 155 [324,11-324,30], Okken 1995a 284 [324,11-324,30], Steppich 2000 187 [320,22-324,30] Interpretation: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Mettke 1981 25 [324,19-324,21], Green 1982b 141 Anm. 34 [324,19-324,24], 280 [324,19-324,21], Haferland 1988 113 [324,19-324,21], Steppich 2000 187 [320,22-324,30] Jüngerer Titurel: Parshall 1981 249 Anm. 7 [322,1-325,30] Kommentar: Schmidt, E. 1979 360, Nellmann 1994c 621 Kommunikation: Urscheler 2002 99 [324,3-324,30], 119 [324,3-324,30] Kyot: Mertens, V. 2004 248 [324,20-324,21] Literaturgeschichte: Lemmer 1981 51, Weigelt 1995 18 [324,19-324,21] Minne u. Ehe: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], McFarland 2004 190 [323,1-324,30] Namen: McFarland 2004 190 [323,1-324,30], Mertens, V. 2004 248 [324,20-324,21] Politik: Mettke 1981 25 [324,19-324,21] Prosa-Lancelot: Remakel 1995 175 [320,5-324,30] Quellen - allgemein: Mertens, V. 2004 248 [324,20-324,21] Quellen - Chrétien: Rachbauer 1934 211 [324,19-324,21], Rachbauer 1970 211 [324,19-324,21], Rachbauer 1980 211 [324,19-324,21], Sutter 2003 90 Anm. 342 [324,19-324,21] Realismus: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 162 [324,11-325,10], Parshall 1981 249 Anm. 7 [322,1-325,30], Remakel 1995 175 [320,5-324,30] Stil: Mergell 1943 101 Anm. 52 [324,19-324,21], 102 [324,19-324,24], Laserstein 1967 32 [153,14-372,18] Überlieferung: Hofstätter 1951 78 [324,5-325,10], Schirok 1985 190 [324,19-324,21], Bonath und Lomnitzer 1989 111 [323,20-324,22], 126 [323,26-324,30], 128 [324,5-325,10], Stephan-Chlustin 2004 131 [324,19-324,21] Übersetzung: Nellmann 1994c 621 Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Schultheiß 1937 16 [324,15-324,21], Sutter 2003 90 Anm. 342 [324,19-324,21] Wahrnehmung, Blick usw: McFarland 2004 190 [323,1-324,30] Willehalm: Schmidt, E. 1979 360 Wolfram - Biographie: Mettke 1981 25 [324,19-324,21], Lemmer 1982 60, Mettke 1989a 10 [324,19-324,21] Wortschatz: Schultheiß 1937 16 [324,15-324,21], Ehrismann, O. 1995 155 [324,11-324,30], Okken 1995a 284 [324,11-324,30] Zeitverhältnisse: Sutter 2003 90 Anm. 342 [324,19-324,21] | |
| (zu den versspezifischen Angaben) |