488,21 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben)
Adaptation: Weber, G. 1928 266 > [488,1-490,2], Rachbauer 1934 240 [488,21-488,30], Mergell 1943 214 [488,21-491,18], 227 [488,21-488,30], 241 [488,21-489,20], Rachbauer 1970 240 [488,21-488,30], Rachbauer 1980 240 [488,21-488,30] Anfortas: Blamires 1966 109 Anm. 1, 339 [488,21-488,25] Ausgabe: Nellmann 1994c 702 [488,21-488,30] Blutstropfenepisode: Dewald 1975 276 Anm. 24 Buch IX: Horacek 1972 225 >, Tax 1974a 126 [488,21-488,23], Schirok 1976 62 [488,21-489,21], Acker 1979 51 Anm. 11 [488,1-488,30], Neuendorff 1987a 280 [488,21-488,30], 287 [488,21-488,30] Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 109 Anm. 1, 339 [488,21-488,25] Condwiramurs: Blamires 1966 109 Anm. 1, 339 [488,21-488,25] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Lampe 1990 168-70 [487,23-489,21] Erzähltechnik: Mergell 1943 214 [488,21-491,18], 227 [488,21-488,30], 241 [488,21-489,20], Tax 1974a 126 [488,21-488,23], Dewald 1975 276 Anm. 24, Schirok 1976 62 [488,21-489,21], Ruh 1980 93 >, Parshall 1981 128 [488,21-488,23], Green 1982b 186 Anm. 39, 196 [488,21-488,30], 199 Anm. 87, Northcott 1983 428 Anm. 8 [488,21-488,30], Neuendorff 1987a 280 [488,21-488,30], 287 [488,21-488,30] ethischer Wortschatz: San-Marte 1861 254 [488,21-488,25], 266 [488,1-488,30], Wapnewski 1955 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30], Mohr 1958b 10 Anm. 6, Mohr 1966a 300 Anm. 6, Mohr 1979e 75 Anm. 6, Wapnewski 1982 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30] Feirefiz: Blamires 1966 109 Anm. 1, 339 [488,21-488,25] Fiktionalität: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Forschungsbericht: Lowet 1955 162 [488,20-488,30], 197 [488,21-488,25] Fragen: Helm 1953 101 Anm. 10 [488,21-488,25], 101 [488,21-489,21] französischer Wortschatz: Wiener 1895 329 Fuetrer, Ulrich: Nyholm 1964 194 [488,14-489,21] Gahmuret: Blamires 1966 109 Anm. 1, 339 [488,21-488,25] Gawan: Blamires 1966 109 Anm. 1, 339 [488,21-488,25] Gesamtwürdigung: Sacker 1963 52 [488,21-488,30], Kratz, H. 1973a 301 [488,21-488,30], Ruh 1980 93 > Gral: San-Marte 1861 254 [488,21-488,25], 266 [488,1-488,30], Birch-Hirschfeld 1877 269 [488,18-489,4], Weber, G. 1948 81 [488,1-489,21], 130 [488,21-488,30], 206 [488,21-489,21], Mockenhaupt 1968 74 [488,21-488,30], Dewald 1975 276 Anm. 24 Handschriftliches: Lampe 1990 168-70 [487,23-489,21] Hartmann von Aue: Wapnewski 1955 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30], Wapnewski 1982 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30] Herzeloyde: Blamires 1966 109 Anm. 1, 339 [488,21-488,25] höfisches Leben: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Individualität: Blamires 1966 109 Anm. 1, 339 [488,21-488,25] Interpretation: Weber, G. 1948 81 [488,1-489,21], 130 [488,21-488,30], 206 [488,21-489,21], Mohr 1958b 10 Anm. 6, Mohr 1966a 300 Anm. 6, Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Dewald 1975 276 Anm. 24, Nagel, B. 1978 77, Mohr 1979e 75 Anm. 6, Ruh 1980 93 >, Nagel, B. 1981b 103, Green 1982b 186 Anm. 39, 196 [488,21-488,30], 199 Anm. 87, Schmid, E. 1986 183, Lampe 1990 168-70 [487,23-489,21] Jüngerer Titurel: Parshall 1981 128 [488,21-488,23] Kommentar: Joos und Whitesell 1951 140, Nellmann 1994c 702 [488,21-488,30] Kyot: Weber, G. 1928 266 > [488,1-490,2], Lowet 1955 162 [488,20-488,30], 197 [488,21-488,25] Lichtmetaphorik: Cessari 2000 123 [488,21-489,4] Literaturgeschichte: Bertau 1972/73 975 [488,1-489,21], Ruh 1980 93 >, Bertau 1972/73 975 [488,1-489,21] Männerfiguren: Meister 1990a 262 [488,21-488,24] Minne u. Ehe: Wapnewski 1955 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30], Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26], Dewald 1975 276 Anm. 24, Wapnewski 1982 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30] Parzival: Blamires 1966 109 Anm. 1, 339 [488,21-488,25], Meister 1990a 262 [488,21-488,24] Prolog: Wapnewski 1955 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30], Wapnewski 1982 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30] Quellen - allgemein: Weber, G. 1928 266 > [488,1-490,2] Quellen - Chrétien: Birch-Hirschfeld 1877 269 [488,18-489,4], Weber, G. 1928 266 > [488,1-490,2], Rachbauer 1934 240 [488,21-488,30], Rachbauer 1970 240 [488,21-488,30], Rachbauer 1980 240 [488,21-488,30] Realismus: Huth 1972 404 [185,21-815,26] Religion: San-Marte 1861 254 [488,21-488,25], 266 [488,1-488,30], Ehrismann, G. 1908 441 [488,21-489,21], Weber, G. 1935 23 [488,1-489,30], Mockenhaupt 1942 74 [488,21-488,30], Weber, G. 1948 81 [488,1-489,21], 130 [488,21-488,30], 206 [488,21-489,21], Lowet 1955 162 [488,20-488,30], 197 [488,21-488,25], Wapnewski 1955 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30], Mockenhaupt 1968 74 [488,21-488,30], Wapnewski 1982 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30], Lampe 1990 168-70 [487,23-489,21], Cessari 2000 123 [488,21-489,4] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 194 [488,14-489,21], Parshall 1981 128 [488,21-488,23] Ritterethik: Ehrismann, G. 1908 441 [488,21-489,21], Lowet 1955 162 [488,20-488,30], 197 [488,21-488,25], Mockenhaupt 1968 74 [488,21-488,30] Schuld: Mockenhaupt 1968 74 [488,21-488,30] fünf Sinne: Northcott 1983 428 Anm. 8 [488,21-488,30] Sprache: Dewald 1975 276 Anm. 24, Tao 1997 129 [488,21-488,27] Steiner, Rudolf (Anthroposophie): Lampe 1990 168-70 [487,23-489,21], Krüger, C. 2002 355 Anm. 120 > Stil: Weber, G. 1928 266 > [488,1-490,2], Mergell 1943 214 [488,21-491,18], 227 [488,21-488,30], 241 [488,21-489,20], Kutzner 1975 207 [488,21-489,21] Subjektivität: Dewald 1975 276 Anm. 24 Sünde: Helm 1953 101 Anm. 10 [488,21-488,25], 101 [488,21-489,21], Wapnewski 1955 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30], Mockenhaupt 1968 74 [488,21-488,30], Wapnewski 1982 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30] Teilausgabe: Joos und Whitesell 1951 140 Titurel: Ruh 1980 93 > Trevrizent: Blamires 1966 109 Anm. 1, 339 [488,21-488,25], Tax 1974a 126 [488,21-488,23] Übersetzung: Nellmann 1994c 702 [488,21-488,30] Übersetzungsproblematik: Schröder, Werner 1979e 158-62 [488,1-489,2], Schröder, Werner 1995c 29-33 [488,1-489,2] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Mohr 1958b 10 Anm. 6, Mohr 1966a 300 Anm. 6, Mohr 1979e 75 Anm. 6, Müller, E. 1979 113 Anm. 24, Bertau 1983i 204, Schmid, E. 1986 183, Delabar 1990 120, Jones, W. 1990 23 elterngeschichte)/Vorgeschichte (Gahmuret/Elterngeschichte): Lowet 1955 162 [488,20-488,30], 197 [488,21-488,25] Werkstruktur: Wapnewski 1955 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30], Horacek 1972 225 >, Schirok 1976 62 [488,21-489,21], Acker 1979 51 Anm. 11 [488,1-488,30], Wapnewski 1982 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30] Willehalm: Ruh 1980 93 > Wissenschaftsgeschichte: Joos und Whitesell 1951 140, Schröder, Werner 1979e 158-62 [488,1-489,2], Schröder, Werner 1995c 29-33 [488,1-489,2] Wolfram - Biographie: Ruh 1980 93 > Zahlenkomposition: Wapnewski 1955 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30], Schirok 1976 62 [488,21-489,21], Acker 1979 51 Anm. 11 [488,1-488,30], Wapnewski 1982 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30], Lampe 1990 168-70 [487,23-489,21] zwîvel: Helm 1953 101 Anm. 10 [488,21-488,25], 101 [488,21-489,21], Wapnewski 1955 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30], Wapnewski 1982 78 [488,21-489,21], 157 Anm. 22 [488,21-488,30]
	(zu den versspezifischen Angaben)