| 672,13 (zu den versspezifischen Angaben) | |
|
Adaptation: Bernhardt 1901 373 [671,8-672,24], Fourquet 1938b 143 [672,8-672,14], Mergell 1943 306 [672,1-672,14], Fourquet 1966b 112 [672,8-672,14]
Anfortas: Blamires 1966 424 [672,11-672,14], Neudeck 1994b 60 Anm. 32 [672,7-672,14] Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 424 [672,11-672,14] Clinschor: Blank 1989a 321 Anm. 4 [672,4-672,14] Condwiramurs: Blamires 1966 424 [672,11-672,14] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Boigs 1987 374 [672,8-672,14], [670,1-672,20], Sutter 2003 100 [672,5-672,14] Erzähler: Bradley, R. 1981 248 [672,8-672,14] Erzähltechnik: Mergell 1943 306 [672,1-672,14], Johnson, S. 1958 291 [670,23-672,21], Bradley, R. 1981 248 [672,8-672,14], Green 1982b 171 [672,5-672,14], Urscheler 2002 96 [672,2-672,14] ethischer Wortschatz: Mohr 1958b 22 [672,5-672,14], Mohr 1966a 317 [672,5-672,14], Mohr 1979e 92 [672,5-672,14] Feirefiz: Blamires 1966 424 [672,11-672,14] Fiktionalität: Huth 1972 63 [672,8-672,14], 404 [185,21-815,26] Frauen (allgemein): Kellermann-Haaf 1986 66 [672,5-672,14], Miklautsch 1991a 24 [672,8-672,21] Fuetrer, Ulrich: Nyholm 1964 266 [670,21-672,21] Gahmuret: Blamires 1966 424 [672,11-672,14] Gattung: Haferland 1988 107 [672,8-672,14] Gawan: Blamires 1966 424 [672,11-672,14] Gawan-Handlung: Johnson, S. 1958 291 [670,23-672,21], Boigs 1987 374 [672,8-672,14], [670,1-672,20], Jones, M. 1999 66 [672,8-672,14] Gesamtwürdigung: Kratz, H. 1973a 367-68 [672,5-672,14], Bumke 2004 158 [672,7-672,14] Gewalt: Neudeck 1994b 60 Anm. 32 [672,7-672,14] Grammatik: Bernhardt 1901 373 [671,8-672,24] Herrschaft: Neudeck 1994b 60 Anm. 32 [672,7-672,14] Herzeloyde: Blamires 1966 424 [672,11-672,14] höfischer Roman: Haferland 1988 107 [672,8-672,14] höfisches Leben: Huth 1972 63 [672,8-672,14], 404 [185,21-815,26] Individualität: Blamires 1966 424 [672,11-672,14] Interpretation: Mohr 1958b 22 [672,5-672,14], Mohr 1966a 317 [672,5-672,14], Huth 1972 63 [672,8-672,14], 404 [185,21-815,26], Mohr 1979e 92 [672,5-672,14], Bradley, R. 1981 248 [672,8-672,14], Green 1982b 171 [672,5-672,14], Haferland 1988 107 [672,8-672,14], Blank 1989a 321 Anm. 4 [672,4-672,14], Pratelidis 1994 135 [672,1-672,21] Kommunikation: Urscheler 2002 96 [672,2-672,14] Literaturgeschichte: Bertau 1972/73 1009 [672,8-672,14], [672,8-672,14] Männerfiguren: Blank 1989a 321 Anm. 4 [672,4-672,14] Minne u. Ehe: Huth 1972 63 [672,8-672,14], 404 [185,21-815,26], Kleber, J. 1992b 343 [672,8-672,14] Parzival: Blamires 1966 424 [672,11-672,14] Der Pleier: Kern, Peter 1981 73 Anm. 19 [672,1-672,14], 90 Anm. 12 [672,8-672,13] Politik: Kellermann-Haaf 1986 66 [672,5-672,14] Quellen - allgemein: Heinzel 1893 98 [672,8-672,21], Fourquet 1938b 143 [672,8-672,14], Fourquet 1966b 112 [672,8-672,14] Quellen - Chrétien: Fourquet 1938b 143 [672,8-672,14], Fourquet 1966b 112 [672,8-672,14], Sutter 2003 100 [672,5-672,14] Realismus: Huth 1972 63 [672,8-672,14], 404 [185,21-815,26] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 266 [670,21-672,21], Kern, Peter 1981 73 Anm. 19 [672,1-672,14], 90 Anm. 12 [672,8-672,13] Rittertum: Neudeck 1994b 60 Anm. 32 [672,7-672,14] Soziologie: Pratelidis 1994 135 [672,1-672,21] Stil: Mergell 1943 306 [672,1-672,14] Syntax: Horacek 1952c 291, 298, Horacek 1964 98, 140 Trevrizent: Blamires 1966 424 [672,11-672,14] Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Mohr 1958b 22 [672,5-672,14], Mohr 1966a 317 [672,5-672,14], Mohr 1979e 92 [672,5-672,14], Bertau 1983i 202, Miklautsch 1991a 24 [672,8-672,21], Sutter 2003 100 [672,5-672,14] Zauberei: Blank 1989a 321 Anm. 4 [672,4-672,14] Zeitverhältnisse: Sutter 2003 100 [672,5-672,14] | |
| (zu den versspezifischen Angaben) |