672,13 (zu den werkspezifischen Angaben)	[Zu 672,12]
Adaptation: Mergell 1943 306 [672,1-672,14] Charakterisierung: Blamires 1966 424 [672,11-672,14] Clinschor: Blank 1989a 321 Anm. 4 [672,4-672,14] Entstehungsgeschichte des Parzival: Boigs 1987 374 [672,8-672,14], [670,1-672,20] Erzähltechnik: Johnson, S. 1958 291 [670,23-672,21], Green 1982b 171 [672,5-672,14], Urscheler 2002 96 [672,2-672,14] Frauen (allgemein): Kellermann-Haaf 1986 66 [672,5-672,14], Miklautsch 1991a 24 [672,8-672,21] Gawan-Handlung: Jones, M. 1999 66 [672,8-672,14] Grammatik: Bernhardt 1901 373 [671,8-672,24] Individualität: Bumke 2004 158 [672,7-672,14] Interpretation: Bertau 1972/73 1009 [672,8-672,14], Huth 1972 63 [672,8-672,14], 404 [185,21-815,26], Kratz, H. 1973a 367-68 [672,5-672,14], Bradley, R. 1981 248 [672,8-672,14], Haferland 1988 107 [672,8-672,14], Pratelidis 1994 135 [672,1-672,21] Minne u. Ehe: Kleber, J. 1992b 343 [672,8-672,14] Quellen - allgemein: Heinzel 1893 98 [672,8-672,21], Fourquet 1938b 143 [672,8-672,14], Fourquet 1966b 112 [672,8-672,14] Rezeption (sekundär - Mittelalter): Nyholm 1964 266 [670,21-672,21], Kern, Peter 1981 73 Anm. 19 [672,1-672,14], 90 Anm. 12 [672,8-672,13] Rittertum: Neudeck 1994b 60 Anm. 32 [672,7-672,14] Syntax: Horacek 1952c 291, 298, Horacek 1964 98, 140 Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse: Mohr 1958b 22 [672,5-672,14], Mohr 1966a 317 [672,5-672,14], Mohr 1979e 92 [672,5-672,14], Bertau 1983i 202, Sutter 2003 100 [672,5-672,14]
	[Zu 672,14]